K404

Awesome clocking Congrats bro!!

Congrats on the 8GHz club dude!

Open box customer return? Of course, anyone dumb enough to leave their CPU in a board for return deserves limited sympathy, but at the same time.....

Heh, seems i'm a bit out of date

If it's with GTX580, using XP is a waste of time, the scores are just terrible

I loved this board at the time, despite its hot hot HOT NB, but I really can't think of a reason to use one now....

I'm guessing there's pretty big tweaks even within IE9, because C2D web page scores range from 23 to 45 and there is nothing like 100% difference in the clockspeeds With basic IE9, I hit 19 pages E8400 @ 5400MHz, 23.5 pages: http://hwbot.org/submission/2213561_mtech_pcmark_2005_core_2_e8400_%283.0ghz%29_34701_marks E8600 @ 4650MHz, 26.4 pages: http://hwbot.org/submission/2232799_blindfitter_pcmark_2005_core_2_e8600_%283.33ghz%29_30664_marks E8600 @ 6050MHz, 44.9 pages: http://hwbot.org/submission/2232179_mtech_pcmark_2005_core_2_e8600_%283.33ghz%29_39435_marks Still a massive difference in the understanding of this bench

Does this count as a bug? If I navigate to a 3D benchmark "front page," my "personal best" ranking is at hardware level, not global pic = 1000 words

Shame there's no goats in Star Wars, we'd have your part sorted

Only in your fantasies, Christian

I'm not that hairy though?

Oooohhhhhh a HWB film franchise Episode 1: The Phantom Bot Episode 2: Attack of the Bot Episode 3: Revenge of the Bot Episode 4: A New Bot Episode 5: The Bot Strikes Back Episide 6: Return of the Bot Who will be Jar Jar Binks? Darth Maul? Jabba? Darth VADER? Boba? Young Anakin? Leia? Obi? Han? Chewy?

Thanks bro New score looks perfect

Hey bro. Was this done at 5.1GHz as CPU-Z shows? If so, I think maybe it is a bugged score? GT1 especially, the FPS are too high for 5.1GHz.

That is quite awesome Congrats!!!

Wow Allen... that's AWESOME! :D:D:D:D:D:D

Nope, no tricks, just the usual.

Better for 01: Chase high is much better. Nature is worse than some other drivers, but the net score is still higher thanks to CH 05/06/3DV... 197.45, yup.

I should have thought of that... thanks! EDIT: Hitting "submit" told me I had to include the validation link anyway, so it's all good

I went chasing FSB and never checked the HWB submission guidelines. I have a .cvf file, but no screeny. A screeny is currently the necessary validation. Could HWB add .cvf files as an option for FSB/BCLK validation?

The problem with your example is.... prove it's an ES ES debate only really applies to CPUs because it's the only component with an ES stamp that shows up in detection software....

Gonna class this as a bug. If I navigate to a GPU category and select (e.g.) 2x SLI, then view the rankings for any of the benchmarks, it still includes a bunch of the single card results until I hit "2x" again in "number of cores" ......and the "mixed" rankings make NO obvious sense. e.g..... 1x 2x, 2x, 1x, 2x, 1x, 2x, 1x, 2x, 1x, 1x, 2x, 2x ??

Oh... in case my comment is mis-interpreted, I don't mean cheating in any way, but it's like going up against Chuck Norris, Columbo, Horatio Caine and Neo, all rolled into one.

I think the Pro League is a great idea. IMO the guys who pay for everything (or at least most) themselves should NOT have to be ranked directly against company employees, guys with access to HUNDREDS of CPUs to bin for free, or Massman

Sad news, but at least they went on a WR :D