-> Validated score still wrong? Let us know here

[Blackwarriors]

check the valid and category cpu

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=841410

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=885453

 

the first valid is correct, but the second valid is incorrect for the category

[knopflerbruce]

check the valid and category cpu

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=841410

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=885453

 

the first valid is correct, but the second valid is incorrect for the category

 

720 score moved to 720 BE. Rejected Phenom validations are OK, as long as they don't look weird (this is a known bug).

[Blackwarriors]

yes the validation is ok, but it with posted in the bad category of processor, it with a x3 720 Black Edition and it with poster in normal X3 720 and Black Edition.

 

 

Moreover, it to mark 3912.9 MHz whereas its validation CPU-Z and of 3919.81 MHz.

And to finish, it with a core Deneb whereas the x3 720 with a core heka.

[katiephil]

Hello

 

Would you please inform the user of this and move to 9800 GT category

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=887399

 

He has submitted into the 9800M GT when it should be a 9800 GT desktop GPU.

 

He is using a E8400 + Gigabyte desktop board. Plus does he need to provide more proof in this submissions ? I did not think a screen of just the score was enough

 

Thank you

[katiephil]

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=888423

 

should be 3dmark 03 not 3dmark 05

[Hyperhorn]

http://www.hwbot.org/forum/showpost.php?p=32830&postcount=486

Nothing happened yet.

Some goes for this one, which was mentioned by u22 (thx ) in this thread. I reported it already, too. See, neither I open threads for trivial requests as so much other guys do immediately (and get an answer asap unfortunately...), nor I annoy moderators somewhere else. But this official modest way leads to nothing and I have no idea what else to do.

[stummerwinter]

Please delete this result, it's done @ worng solution (1280x800 instead default): http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=892715

[Hyperhorn]

...plus no subtest details visable.

Already deleted by a team captain of PC Games Hardware.

[Hondacity]

please delete my result

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=847115

 

thanks

[Hondacity]

why?

 

i'll be submitting a 2x result..and i want to see my score...

[Hondacity]

i don't want to keep my 3x score

 

my 2x score will be in the hall of fame...

[Hondacity]

nevermind my posts, thanks

[Hondacity]

Anybody who can clean this up?

 

[Massman]

I'll this afternoon. But ...

 

Please don't abuse the functionality of the site just to get back at people. I can see some serious reporting by you as well, Hondacity ... please, just don't report just for the sake of it.

 

Thanks

[Hondacity]

i reported those that didn't show resolution..as it was covered. i have the same mistakes months ago. which chispy reported. it was rightly done. it wasn't retaliation.

 

if i or anybody find incomplete screenshots i will report it.

 

chispy on the otherhand reports cheating. high clocks are possible with watercooling he should know that.

 

Thanks massman and jmke

 

sorry to bother you...you guys have a lot of job to do.

 

Keep benching

 

HWbot rules

[knopflerbruce]

Non-suspicious scores won't (or at least shouldn't) get blocked if minor details are missing - like resolution and/or CPUZ memory tab.

 

Basically, this just creates more work for the mods - and less time to moderate scores that have REAL issues.

[Hondacity]

Non-suspicious scores won't (or at least shouldn't) get blocked if minor details are missing - like resolution and/or CPUZ memory tab.

 

Basically, this just creates more work for the mods - and less time to moderate scores that have REAL issues.

 

so true...chispy started this shit april 09 man......missing resolution ......no subtests...i'm like WTF

 

now i report his scores...now. look at my profile LOL

[Massman]

I don't really care about who started or what happened, in the end you're not wasting your own time but the time of the result moderators. Given we're all grown-ups here, I reckon there must be another way to solve issues like this.

 

So, let's all give hugs and go in peace

[u22]

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=884213

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=884206

 

wrong dissolution

 

please check all 3dmark06 scores from the user

Edited September 10, 2009 by u22

[Nathanial]

All sorted now so GTFoff my case.

[knopflerbruce]

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=657942

 

I just noticed this one was blocked 2 years ago I wonder why, as the memory allocation is what it should be for pifast 4.1 - 61372k.

[r1ch]

First, I'm not sure if I'm right with this so I don't mean any offense to 3oh6 and if it's not a problem that's fine.

 

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=860974

 

PCMark05 default resolution is 1024x768, his res is 800x600. Does a lower res give a higher score in PCM05 like 3DM?

[Hondacity]

i don't see 800x600

 

i assume he's using the default resolution though

[knopflerbruce]

I guess some tests would give some "way off" numbers if he was running the wrong res.

[Hondacity]

hi im not sure if this is too high... http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=874315

 

comparing it to other results..including mine..the results just don't add up...

 

i'm not complaining but...score is just kinda high...