I think this result is too high: http://hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=577710

The screen is incomplete.

Guys, that's a score from a team mate of mine: http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=782542

It has been invalidated because the ORB link is missing because it's a top20 result...

But it's not in top20, it's far from being in top20.

I don't find this score "too high". check the submission date also...

P4 + Geforce 4 have been consistently scoring high in Aquamark on Win2000/XP

 

Results of nVidia Ti4800:

1) 46.098 (the screen shows only aquamark score)

2) 36.179

3) 36.061

4) 34.983

5) 34.887

6) 33.037

ecc.

 

Is it Normal? O_o

^^

 

most likely he made a typo in his score:)

 

I understood what has happened there... the score was in top20 one year ago!

I didn't noticed that was October 2008 and not 2009!

So, as of today it's far from top20 but when it was posted... so, if you want to proceed judging it "not valid" I think it's fair.

Thanks jmke

yes http://hwbot.org/listResults.do?gpuModelId=301&applicationId=10&filterUser=true&filterBlocked=true&sli=false&limit=100

I know for a fact

 

check the CPU and GPU scores compared to the other results;

somehow P4 + GF4 back then really scored high in Aquamark, go figure?

maybe a driver version/OS advantage?

 

Where is your screen? Deleted?

P4 goes better than Core2Duo?

10k points better with a P4? I don't think that.

Moreover, i think that when the screen shows only the aquamrk score is against the rules, no?

I believe these scores are from a card with a lower spec cards bios....

 

http://hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=875314

http://hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=875315

http://hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=875317

http://hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=875320

http://hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=875323

 

Shaders are wrong. Shaders on a 7600LE are as shown..

 

 

Those shaders in those benches are from a higher card, the 7600GS, 7600GT or the 7650GS. The guy in question has a 7650GS benched in his profile.

 

Just in case you've missed this one jmke, but I understand you're a busy guy

 

I'd appreciate it if you could look into it, because I've tried and tried and this score is just not possible using a 7600LE.

I understood what has happened there... the score was in top20 one year ago!

I didn't noticed that was October 2008 and not 2009!

So, as of today it's far from top20 but when it was posted... so, if you want to proceed judging it "not valid" I think it's fair.

Thanks jmke

 

Maybe we need a moderation button for this type of blocked scores... so that we get a notification... say 6 months after the submission date so we can unblock those that are no longer in top20.

Maybe we need a moderation button for this type of blocked scores... so that we get a notification... say 6 months after the submission date so we can unblock those that are no longer in top20.

 

interesting function, only visible by staff members of course

after 6 years some things vanish, the aquamark SS rule was made in 2008. score was made in 2003, with valid AQM3 link at the time etc etc..

 

One of my results was deleted from the ranking because the screen is busy of windows. Why you can keep a result without screen but i can't preserve a result with screen (800x600)?

http://hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=195656&thumb=false

 

Can you restore it?

One of my results was deleted from the ranking because the screen is busy of windows. Why you can keep a result without screen but i can't preserve a result with screen (800x600)?

http://hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=195656&thumb=false

 

Can you restore it?

 

The missing info would be the first loop times, and the "1m calculation" part (Rules: http://hwbot.org/benchmark.application.info.do?applicationId=3#rules)

 

IMO this is just minor stuff, 19 loops means 1m AFAIK too. Plus, the score doesn't look weird. I vote for unblock, but I'd like to have a second opinion.

Still cannot validate the 32M score. No matter it seems what I do states 'Invalid Validation' or something on webpages.

 

Using Q9450 on Modded Motherboard BIOS Intel X38 running at 3,6Ghz on DDR2 at 900Mhz. Any idea how to get this working v1.55 states there's no longer accepting scores, v2.00 says invalid and been this way like past as long I remember wPrime.

 

http://i38.tinypic.com/5fovnl.png

 

Funny thing is I managed to validate 1024M score just fine.

Edited November 7, 200915 yr by genetix

Wprime 2.00 is not supported at the bot.

 

So, what then is?

 

There's not really many real benchmark softwares out there. Plus all are x86 based which today technology is same as faking all scores even wPrime but at least it knew how to properly multi-thread.

Edited November 7, 200915 yr by genetix

http://hwbot.org/benchmark.application.info.do?applicationId=14

1.55

 

And this one I also tested states that it's not anymore accepted & error on web page.

And this one I also tested states that it's not anymore accepted & error on web page.

 

Post a screenshot instead. That always works;)

hi can someone please look at my 3d06 score i have submited trying to get it sorted out, it wont update it

it says you dont participate in the rankings

ie you have to check the box at the bottom before you submit saying that you want a score nice run btw

even if i tick or not it still should show up in the wr top 20

Edited November 8, 200915 yr by boostisbest

ok thanks for the reply holding on tight lol

ok thanks for the reply holding on tight

STILL holding on tight

hi

got my my scores blocked in wiprime ... again...

 

here are the links. i dont see any reason why these are invalid. if Im missing something please help=)

 

http://hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=920304

 

http://hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=920303

they are not blocked, somebody just reported them.

http://www.hwbot.org/forum/showpost.php?p=32830&postcount=486

Nothing happened yet.

Some goes for this one, which was mentioned by u22 (thx ) in this thread. I reported it already, too. See, neither I open threads for trivial requests as so much other guys do immediately (and get an answer asap unfortunately...), nor I annoy moderators somewhere else. But this official modest way leads to nothing and I have no idea what else to do.

No answer or action after months and several friendly reminders, but I still think that the mentioned scores @ the first link have to get moved and it`s not fun at all to steal a validation.

I have sent this message to first moderator on line, and sorry Turrican that was you, but maybe here i could find answer for my question.

 

I was wondering if this could be a explained, and of course if you have time for this "checking".

 

3Dmark 01

 

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=566945 [ about 100mhz freq more for memory on card, but 800mhz less than my E8500, and he gained over 5k points ?

 

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=923607 - here you can take a look at this score made by me.

 

 

Honestly i really do not know what he did, but i think something is really strange : )

 

Maybe some tweaks could do the magic, but for 5k points, I would really like to know what happened.

 

Thank you for your time.

You're on Windows 7 which is suicide for 3DM01... you also dont have an FPS breakdown window open so its hard to see where hes gaining FPS over you.... seeing as you're on W7... I expect it to be in every subtest

 

You're verification link takes me back to your screenshot