Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
11 hours ago, Mr.Scott said:

Can you explain what exactly 'sloppy wazaa' does different than regular wazaa?

yeah, any technical explanation beside "just open it and when its slower reopen" :D
what does it? how it affects the write/read/cache readings? does this only apply with ramdisk awe?
thanks for including the ring/cache in the result window, awesome work as always :D

Edited by noizemaker
Posted

It clears the System Cache. That's it.

I only tested with AWE as this is where the bottleneck was detected and could be reproduced.

All other answers need to come from those who use the new tweak. Play around, fill up those excel sheets with results of all combinations, analyze and share!

  • Thanks 3
Posted (edited)
On 10/29/2022 at 7:44 PM, Leeghoofd said:

BenchMate 10.12.2 is the version to use from the 29th of October at HWBOT, please update your benching OSses !!!

The result you get if you try download Benchmate fom the website... @_mat_ Any fix? Thanks

Also Virustotal show it as malware (Eset scanner).

image.thumb.png.d6106f95e68e6d4e88e67511897c10ac.png

Edited by Papusan
Posted (edited)
7 hours ago, Leeghoofd said:

I think its your antivirus, no problems here with F-Secure

I know. Eset flagged it as malware. Also on Virustotal. But it still should be fixed.

I exclude the download link from Eset scanner and downloaded Benchmate.exe. Then load up the file on Virustotal to see what was detected. Detected as Trojan.Generic.Win32.1667275

Edited by Papusan
Posted (edited)

@Leeghoofd The result submission in BenchMate currently returns an error 403.

This is the response from hwbot.org:

<head><title>403 Forbidden</title></head>
<body>
<center><h1>403 Forbidden</h1></center>
<hr><center>nginx/1.22.0</center>
</body>
</html>

 

Edited by _mat_
Posted

@Leeghoofd It's not a timeout. It's "Resource Forbidden".

Please let the dev check the server log to figure out what's going on here. My guess is that some upload parameter causes the error. For example a big screenshot triggering an upload limit.

I also tested Super PI and CB R23. Seems to be unrelated to the benchmark that's submitted.

  • Crew
Posted

well I run a 4K screen and can up each benchmate score flawlessly Mat, all hex keys and co are checked, verified and identical as before the migration. I asked for benchmate datafiles of the troublesome scores from the guy on Discord, I didn't get anything to confirm your ideas ( regarding file size or whatever)

Posted

_Mat_ and myself have the same issue. btw I am also Peaches182 on discord.

 

I would be happy to share some data where shall I share the data for investigation ?

What shall I share exactly ?

Posted (edited)
18 hours ago, Leeghoofd said:

well I run a 4K screen and can up each benchmate score flawlessly Mat, all hex keys and co are checked, verified and identical as before the migration. I asked for benchmate datafiles of the troublesome scores from the guy on Discord, I didn't get anything to confirm your ideas ( regarding file size or whatever)

A cople of days before I got the same 403 error on my desktop. Then run benchnmate on my laptop. Nothing wrong with subbing. Today I run Benchmate once again on my desktop. Got same error. Tried two times to add in my password (I'm sure I put it in correct first time). First time I tried post results I got error, but the next time it passed and I coud post results on the bot. 

Edited by Papusan
  • Crew
Posted
On 9/30/2022 at 7:45 AM, _mat_ said:

Edit: I have not tried it on XP or without my RAMDisk.

Any chances to see a stand-alone and preferrably WinXP-compatible RAMDisk implementation? Would really like to compare your techniques to classic ones.

  • Like 1
  • Crew
Posted
2 hours ago, Papusan said:

A cople of days before I got the same 403 error on my desktop. Then run benchnmate on my laptop. Nothing wrong with subbing. Today I run Benchmate once again on my desktop. Got same error. Tried two times to add in my password (I'm sure I put it in correct first time). First time I tried post results I got error, but the next time it passed and I coud post results on the bot. 

indeed its configured correctly but sometimes the API seems to  block/refuse the submission. It's passed onto the programmers.

  • Like 1
Posted

Submission thread exiting
Injecting the hook via the control service!
Result GPU couldn't be found in run measurement vector: AMD Radeon Graphics (Method: 0)
Result GPU couldn't be found in run measurement vector: AMD Radeon Graphics (Method: 1)
Result GPU couldn't be found in run measurement vector: AMD Radeon Graphics (Method: 2)
Result GPU couldn't be found in run measurement vector: AMD Radeon Graphics (Method: 3)
Result GPU could not be matched to the GPUs in run measurement vector!
 => AMD Radeon Vega (2004.16/2000.00 MHz) with avg load: 98.37%
Monitor scale factor: 1.000000
Screenshot successfully captured
Screenshot successfully saved to file: C:\Program Files (x86)\BenchMate 10\results\GPUPI_3.3_1B_GPU_87.511.jpg (554550 Bytes)
Submission thread running: 0x00000000000002D0
New submission update status: Connecting to hwbot.org (5%)
New submission update status: Preparing GPUPI 3.3: 1B GPU | 87.511 s (10%)
New submission update status: Uploading GPUPI 3.3: 1B GPU | 87.511 s (32%)
New submission update status: Uploading GPUPI 3.3: 1B GPU | 87.511 s: 0% (32%)
New submission update status: Uploading GPUPI 3.3: 1B GPU | 87.511 s: 15% (42%)
New submission update status: Uploading GPUPI 3.3: 1B GPU | 87.511 s: 45% (62%)
New submission update status: Uploading GPUPI 3.3: 1B GPU | 87.511 s: 67% (77%)
New submission update status: Uploading GPUPI 3.3: 1B GPU | 87.511 s: 100% (100%)
HWBOT server returned with HTTP status code: 403
Could not submit the result data online: HTTP error 403
Submission update error: Could not upload result file to hwbot.org: GPUPI 3.3: 1B GPU | 87.511 s

  • Crew
Posted
On 11/11/2022 at 8:33 AM, Peaches182 said:

Submission thread exiting
Injecting the hook via the control service!
Result GPU couldn't be found in run measurement vector: AMD Radeon Graphics (Method: 0)
Result GPU couldn't be found in run measurement vector: AMD Radeon Graphics (Method: 1)
Result GPU couldn't be found in run measurement vector: AMD Radeon Graphics (Method: 2)
Result GPU couldn't be found in run measurement vector: AMD Radeon Graphics (Method: 3)
Result GPU could not be matched to the GPUs in run measurement vector!
 => AMD Radeon Vega (2004.16/2000.00 MHz) with avg load: 98.37%
Monitor scale factor: 1.000000
Screenshot successfully captured
Screenshot successfully saved to file: C:\Program Files (x86)\BenchMate 10\results\GPUPI_3.3_1B_GPU_87.511.jpg (554550 Bytes)
Submission thread running: 0x00000000000002D0
New submission update status: Connecting to hwbot.org (5%)
New submission update status: Preparing GPUPI 3.3: 1B GPU | 87.511 s (10%)
New submission update status: Uploading GPUPI 3.3: 1B GPU | 87.511 s (32%)
New submission update status: Uploading GPUPI 3.3: 1B GPU | 87.511 s: 0% (32%)
New submission update status: Uploading GPUPI 3.3: 1B GPU | 87.511 s: 15% (42%)
New submission update status: Uploading GPUPI 3.3: 1B GPU | 87.511 s: 45% (62%)
New submission update status: Uploading GPUPI 3.3: 1B GPU | 87.511 s: 67% (77%)
New submission update status: Uploading GPUPI 3.3: 1B GPU | 87.511 s: 100% (100%)
HWBOT server returned with HTTP status code: 403
Could not submit the result data online: HTTP error 403
Submission update error: Could not upload result file to hwbot.org: GPUPI 3.3: 1B GPU | 87.511 s

Could it be hwinfo doesn't pick up the correct GPU ? can you try another GPU ?

 

 

 

BM2.jpg

Posted

Should be fine, you can provide the GPU on the intermediate page on HWBOT. At least that's how it always worked.

I also had the problem on Super PI btw. With an ES CPU though, so also not a matching CPU name.

Posted
On 11/10/2022 at 5:51 AM, Antinomy said:

Any chances to see a stand-alone and preferrably WinXP-compatible RAMDisk implementation? Would really like to compare your techniques to classic ones.

No chance from my side. It needs the whole BenchMate kit, so everything has to be ported to XP, which is not possible. Lots of OS  functionality needed, that's not available on XP. That's why I decided to not support it from early on. It's hard enough to support Windows 7. At some point in the future I will also kill Win 7 to improve the experience on Win 10+. It takes a lot of time and is zero fun to release on 7. I rather like put my effort into the future of things. For example WinUI and MSIX install packages.

As for standalone, the big picture is to provide what's necessary within a single application instead of 10 different tools.

  • Like 1
Posted
On 11/12/2022 at 1:38 PM, Leeghoofd said:

Could it be hwinfo doesn't pick up the correct GPU ? can you try another GPU ?

 

 

 

BM2.jpg

Sorry I can't, I am benching vega form a 5700G with an Asrock X300. No alternate GPU possible in this PC.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...