September 29, 20222 yr You can find some information here: https://benchmate.org/faq/super-pi-sloppy-wazaa It only has a very similar effect. Otherwise it is not related. Edit: I have not tried it on XP or without my RAMDisk. No idea how it would perform standalone. Edited September 29, 20222 yr by _mat_
September 30, 20222 yr 11 hours ago, Mr.Scott said: Can you explain what exactly 'sloppy wazaa' does different than regular wazaa? yeah, any technical explanation beside "just open it and when its slower reopen" what does it? how it affects the write/read/cache readings? does this only apply with ramdisk awe? thanks for including the ring/cache in the result window, awesome work as always Edited September 30, 20222 yr by noizemaker
September 30, 20222 yr It clears the System Cache. That's it. I only tested with AWE as this is where the bottleneck was detected and could be reproduced. All other answers need to come from those who use the new tweak. Play around, fill up those excel sheets with results of all combinations, analyze and share!
October 29, 20222 yr Author Crew BenchMate 10.12.2 is the version to use from the 29th of October at HWBOT, please update your benching OSses !!!
October 31, 20222 yr On 10/29/2022 at 7:44 PM, Leeghoofd said: BenchMate 10.12.2 is the version to use from the 29th of October at HWBOT, please update your benching OSses !!! The result you get if you try download Benchmate fom the website... @_mat_ Any fix? Thanks Also Virustotal show it as malware (Eset scanner). Edited October 31, 20222 yr by Papusan
October 31, 20222 yr 7 hours ago, Leeghoofd said: I think its your antivirus, no problems here with F-Secure I know. Eset flagged it as malware. Also on Virustotal. But it still should be fixed. I exclude the download link from Eset scanner and downloaded Benchmate.exe. Then load up the file on Virustotal to see what was detected. Detected as Trojan.Generic.Win32.1667275 Edited October 31, 20222 yr by Papusan
November 1, 20222 yr There is nothing I can do. Please submit it as False Positive using the ESET GUI (More information here: .https://forum.eset.com/topic/18734-how-do-i-report-a-false-positive-or-whitelist-my-software-with-eset/). It can't be done otherwise, which is puzzling at best. Many free software authors like me struggle from these issues and I personally advise to uninstall AV for benchmarking. Or don't use it at all.
November 5, 20222 yr @Leeghoofd The result submission in BenchMate currently returns an error 403. This is the response from hwbot.org: <head><title>403 Forbidden</title></head> <body> <center><h1>403 Forbidden</h1></center> <hr><center>nginx/1.22.0</center> </body> </html> Edited November 5, 20222 yr by _mat_
November 8, 20222 yr Wanted to submit one score but it seems that something is broken. W11, last version of Benchmate downloaded today. Any chance to have it fixed ? Thanks
November 8, 20222 yr Author Crew Works fine here, maybe you experienced a timeout error https://hwbot.org/submission/5116803_leeghoofd_gpupi_v3.3___1b_geforce_rtx_3090_ti_2sec_756ms
November 8, 20222 yr @Leeghoofd It's not a timeout. It's "Resource Forbidden". Please let the dev check the server log to figure out what's going on here. My guess is that some upload parameter causes the error. For example a big screenshot triggering an upload limit. I also tested Super PI and CB R23. Seems to be unrelated to the benchmark that's submitted.
November 9, 20222 yr Author Crew well I run a 4K screen and can up each benchmate score flawlessly Mat, all hex keys and co are checked, verified and identical as before the migration. I asked for benchmate datafiles of the troublesome scores from the guy on Discord, I didn't get anything to confirm your ideas ( regarding file size or whatever)
November 9, 20222 yr _Mat_ and myself have the same issue. btw I am also Peaches182 on discord. I would be happy to share some data where shall I share the data for investigation ? What shall I share exactly ?
November 10, 20222 yr 18 hours ago, Leeghoofd said: well I run a 4K screen and can up each benchmate score flawlessly Mat, all hex keys and co are checked, verified and identical as before the migration. I asked for benchmate datafiles of the troublesome scores from the guy on Discord, I didn't get anything to confirm your ideas ( regarding file size or whatever) A cople of days before I got the same 403 error on my desktop. Then run benchnmate on my laptop. Nothing wrong with subbing. Today I run Benchmate once again on my desktop. Got same error. Tried two times to add in my password (I'm sure I put it in correct first time). First time I tried post results I got error, but the next time it passed and I coud post results on the bot. Edited November 10, 20222 yr by Papusan
November 10, 20222 yr Crew On 9/30/2022 at 7:45 AM, _mat_ said: Edit: I have not tried it on XP or without my RAMDisk. Any chances to see a stand-alone and preferrably WinXP-compatible RAMDisk implementation? Would really like to compare your techniques to classic ones.
November 10, 20222 yr Author Crew 2 hours ago, Papusan said: A cople of days before I got the same 403 error on my desktop. Then run benchnmate on my laptop. Nothing wrong with subbing. Today I run Benchmate once again on my desktop. Got same error. Tried two times to add in my password (I'm sure I put it in correct first time). First time I tried post results I got error, but the next time it passed and I coud post results on the bot. indeed its configured correctly but sometimes the API seems to block/refuse the submission. It's passed onto the programmers.
November 11, 20222 yr Tested it again, super pi submission is working. GPUPI 3.3 still submission error HTTP 403.
November 11, 20222 yr Submission thread exiting Injecting the hook via the control service! Result GPU couldn't be found in run measurement vector: AMD Radeon Graphics (Method: 0) Result GPU couldn't be found in run measurement vector: AMD Radeon Graphics (Method: 1) Result GPU couldn't be found in run measurement vector: AMD Radeon Graphics (Method: 2) Result GPU couldn't be found in run measurement vector: AMD Radeon Graphics (Method: 3) Result GPU could not be matched to the GPUs in run measurement vector! => AMD Radeon Vega (2004.16/2000.00 MHz) with avg load: 98.37% Monitor scale factor: 1.000000 Screenshot successfully captured Screenshot successfully saved to file: C:\Program Files (x86)\BenchMate 10\results\GPUPI_3.3_1B_GPU_87.511.jpg (554550 Bytes) Submission thread running: 0x00000000000002D0 New submission update status: Connecting to hwbot.org (5%) New submission update status: Preparing GPUPI 3.3: 1B GPU | 87.511 s (10%) New submission update status: Uploading GPUPI 3.3: 1B GPU | 87.511 s (32%) New submission update status: Uploading GPUPI 3.3: 1B GPU | 87.511 s: 0% (32%) New submission update status: Uploading GPUPI 3.3: 1B GPU | 87.511 s: 15% (42%) New submission update status: Uploading GPUPI 3.3: 1B GPU | 87.511 s: 45% (62%) New submission update status: Uploading GPUPI 3.3: 1B GPU | 87.511 s: 67% (77%) New submission update status: Uploading GPUPI 3.3: 1B GPU | 87.511 s: 100% (100%) HWBOT server returned with HTTP status code: 403 Could not submit the result data online: HTTP error 403 Submission update error: Could not upload result file to hwbot.org: GPUPI 3.3: 1B GPU | 87.511 s
November 12, 20222 yr Author Crew On 11/11/2022 at 8:33 AM, Peaches182 said: Submission thread exiting Injecting the hook via the control service! Result GPU couldn't be found in run measurement vector: AMD Radeon Graphics (Method: 0) Result GPU couldn't be found in run measurement vector: AMD Radeon Graphics (Method: 1) Result GPU couldn't be found in run measurement vector: AMD Radeon Graphics (Method: 2) Result GPU couldn't be found in run measurement vector: AMD Radeon Graphics (Method: 3) Result GPU could not be matched to the GPUs in run measurement vector! => AMD Radeon Vega (2004.16/2000.00 MHz) with avg load: 98.37% Monitor scale factor: 1.000000 Screenshot successfully captured Screenshot successfully saved to file: C:\Program Files (x86)\BenchMate 10\results\GPUPI_3.3_1B_GPU_87.511.jpg (554550 Bytes) Submission thread running: 0x00000000000002D0 New submission update status: Connecting to hwbot.org (5%) New submission update status: Preparing GPUPI 3.3: 1B GPU | 87.511 s (10%) New submission update status: Uploading GPUPI 3.3: 1B GPU | 87.511 s (32%) New submission update status: Uploading GPUPI 3.3: 1B GPU | 87.511 s: 0% (32%) New submission update status: Uploading GPUPI 3.3: 1B GPU | 87.511 s: 15% (42%) New submission update status: Uploading GPUPI 3.3: 1B GPU | 87.511 s: 45% (62%) New submission update status: Uploading GPUPI 3.3: 1B GPU | 87.511 s: 67% (77%) New submission update status: Uploading GPUPI 3.3: 1B GPU | 87.511 s: 100% (100%) HWBOT server returned with HTTP status code: 403 Could not submit the result data online: HTTP error 403 Submission update error: Could not upload result file to hwbot.org: GPUPI 3.3: 1B GPU | 87.511 s Could it be hwinfo doesn't pick up the correct GPU ? can you try another GPU ?
November 12, 20222 yr Should be fine, you can provide the GPU on the intermediate page on HWBOT. At least that's how it always worked. I also had the problem on Super PI btw. With an ES CPU though, so also not a matching CPU name.
November 14, 20222 yr On 11/10/2022 at 5:51 AM, Antinomy said: Any chances to see a stand-alone and preferrably WinXP-compatible RAMDisk implementation? Would really like to compare your techniques to classic ones. No chance from my side. It needs the whole BenchMate kit, so everything has to be ported to XP, which is not possible. Lots of OS functionality needed, that's not available on XP. That's why I decided to not support it from early on. It's hard enough to support Windows 7. At some point in the future I will also kill Win 7 to improve the experience on Win 10+. It takes a lot of time and is zero fun to release on 7. I rather like put my effort into the future of things. For example WinUI and MSIX install packages. As for standalone, the big picture is to provide what's necessary within a single application instead of 10 different tools.
November 17, 20222 yr On 11/12/2022 at 1:38 PM, Leeghoofd said: Could it be hwinfo doesn't pick up the correct GPU ? can you try another GPU ? Sorry I can't, I am benching vega form a 5700G with an Asrock X300. No alternate GPU possible in this PC.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.