Jump to content

Featured Replies

  • Replies 62
  • Views 23.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • Tried it on MSI, hitting 5.5Ghz cache thanks der8auer!

  • Darn Max, do you give also special tutoring lessons to the elderly ?

  • Connected the other 2 sets of pad locations plus this one to on board POS cap       Still waiting to hear back from HQ if we can release the full mod

No big deal, it's only $1k to lose :)

 

On a more serious note, would it be possible to produce some adapters that you put on the CPU and adjust this voltage? Kind of like 771-to-775 adapters.

Edited by TaPaKaH

I like you and all Roman, but that is some madness right there

 

Sam test is and report back

Thank you Roman.

 

Time to buy some conductive ink, at least you can remove it compare to straight soldering.

 

It's a patch but I don't think it's the whole solution as 4.7G uncore is benchable almost stock voltage if you processor is cold. But it's great to have a fix :)

Nice guide!

Oh, the soldering tape name you are looking for in kapton. ;)

Reminds me of the wire mod to unlock multipliers on the old AXP, Only difference? this is considerably more complex, it is for voltage and you have to solder. Wait, hold that thought I need to get my iPhone 6 out of the microwave.

Yesterday , I did a test by conduction pen method , I can do 5.95GHz CPU 3.8GHz Cache very easy on Pi 32M !! before the mod I can't do 3.8GHz Cache and High CPU Clock the same time !!

 

This Mod helps for the Cache much stable and possible to finished 5m18s Pi 32M , This benchmark is extreme cache relative.

 

This is CherV™ Pi 32M Plain® Run Reault:

http://hwbot.org/submission/2637384_

 

Is there any reason a simple linear regulator with adjustable output would not work for providing this additional voltage? G-powerboard seems like overkill for providing a few tens milliamps.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...