I'm having issues logging to the oc-sports page on IE and Chrome. On mobile (apple iOS8) I get some apache server 80 issue, but I can navigate the scores correctly.

I just plain hate the interface for oc sports page.

I know you're trying to push it, but Id still prefer the hwbot.org page.

There's no links to individual scores for each round.

Links to "beat this user with this score" go to time target competition.

Links go to dead pages or to the time target competition.

 

Dont put it on this stupid oc-sports site unless you can sort this crap out.

As i said about the "too-early-use-of-esport.io" : http://hwbot.org/news/11481_hwbot_announces_the_hwbot_country_cup_2014_%E2%80%93_from_november_1_until_december_20/

Bump.

 

Any news about the 6core (8core) matter ???

 

and also about the 7870 ?

Hi zeropluszero,

 

We need a few competitions running on the esports site to gather feedback on what needs to be improved. All resources are allocated to esports to fix the majority of the complaints by the end of this week. Thanks for your patience.

 

Or we dont, and leave what works as it is.

Might be to late to add, but I think it would've been good under the submissions to show the Country of the person instead of the Team being it is the Country Cup. Although if both can be there so be it.

Guys, I've enabled the regular page as well as per popular demand

thank you.

Thanks for that.

 

Thank you massman

Thanks guys much better.

MB returned from ASUS.. re-insertion is taking place.... Dusting off 760.. have another AUSSIE AUSSIE AUSSIE score posted soon.

Just wondering about something here.

 

In Div IV, I know Intel and AMD chips are allowed and that's OK but since Intel will definitely dominate this part of the comp, what's the point of even running an AMD in it?

 

Would make sense if out of the five best entries per country, one has to be an AMD sub so the AMD guys could at least compete in some way or have an impact. I know the comp is what it is but running an AMD in this is useless to do and a waste of time and effort. I do own an Intel so it's not that I'm griping about it, I can run it if I want but to me it just seems odd to include something that stands no chance of well... Doing anything that would make a difference in this. I looked over the rules for it and the way it is ATM, Intels will determine the outcome with any AMD entries being a null factor.

Its the average of 10 scores. One with each architecture is requured. The slow stuff is what eventually brings down the average and has a big impact on final scores.

In relation to this.

 

"The system picture must be of the system in use during the overclocking session"

 

Is this even relevant if submission of close up's of the GPU and CPU blocks are all some people are submitting??

 

Especially in Stage 4.

 

I thought the idea of this would be to take a step back and take a picture of your whole system including screen and cooling setup???

Its the average of 10 scores. One with each architecture is requured. The slow stuff is what eventually brings down the average and has a big impact on final scores.

 

Ah - Now it makes proper sense.

Haven't got the hang of the new comp screens yet and that why I missed it. Took forever it seemed to get to the proper page once I did find it with this info on the rankings.

Is there a way to tell what position you're country is sitting in for each type of hardware per stage?

 

For example, Stage 4. If I wanted to know how we are sitting for the best 32m time for 'Richland', is there a way I can compare CC entries for Richland only?

 

This way we can monitor and focus on what needs times improved for each hardware type in each stage.

 

 

Mods re: the 32M cpu freq limit, what's to stop people with on-the-fly tuning software or boards to jack up the frequency during the run and then dial it down again for the screen shot? Do we need some kind of verification to prevent that?

Mods re: the 32M cpu freq limit, what's to stop people with on-the-fly tuning software or boards to jack up the frequency during the run and then dial it down again for the screen shot? Do we need some kind of verification to prevent that?

 

Integrity

Integrity

 

I get it, but it's almost laughable.

videos. thats about it.

if it's out of line i am sure there will be a requirement for more proof. I hope people dont do stupid shit but yeah LCC in a comp like this is definitely really risky

if it's out of line i am sure there will be a requirement for more proof. I hope people dont do stupid bunnyextraction but yeah LCC in a comp like this is definitely really risky

 

Last time turned out ok, only very few cheaters remember?

 

http://hwbot.org/competition/country_cup_2013/stage/1158_superpi_32m_low_clock_challenge

who is your implication Calathea?