Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Hmmm, you must of missed my post #84 of my chip.

 

http://www.hwbot.org/forum/showpost.php?p=92663&postcount=84

 

 

Either way new high for me:

 

2600k

 

5640.6 MHz

 

Batch # - L041B229

 

Serial # - 1422

 

http://www.hwbot.org/community/submission/2123096_drnip_cpu_z_core_i7_2600k_5640.57_mhz

 

EDIT: I found it. You have mine under L041B299 whereas mine is L041B229.

Edited by drnip
Posted (edited)

damn thats bad luck splave but I will tell you that i think 2500K will require alot more binning and luck.

 

Day 1

2500K hand picked from looking at 60 boxxes.

5.5 L041B144 0743

 

2600K Nothing i saw interesting so eeenie meenie miny moe from 60+ boxxes ran out of eenies and meenies......

5.4 L050A933 0170

 

Day 2 trip 1 and 2......

 

Complete lotto, not trying to draw attention returning dead chips ;)

 

2500K

5.2 L045A932 3171

5.2 L048A? forget

 

2600K

5.4 L050A933 I forget.....26XX i think....

5.3 L050A933 2532

 

Let it cool off a couple days then do another round.

 

Btw no need to bench them, in fact no need to even post windows on giga or overvolt them

 

Boot at 50X with pll overide disabled. No post = 5.4 or less chip.

Edited by chew*
Posted
damn thats bad luck splave but I will tell you that i think 2500K will require alot more binning and luck.

 

Day 1

2500K hand picked

5.5 L041B144 0743

 

2600K Nothing i saw interesting so eeenie meenie miny moe

5.4 L050A933 0170

 

Day 2 trip 1 and 2......

 

2500K

5.2 L045A932 3171

5.2 L048A? forget

 

2600K

5.4 L050A933 I forget.....26XX i think....

5.3 L050A933 2532

Seems like 5.0 to 5.4 is the normal range for chips..

Posted

Pieter, in the batch list, mine is the L042B076 at 5300mhz.

I tried it@ln2 and it maxed out at 5322.

If you want to update, I have also the SN: it's 0060 :)

 

Boblemagnifique has the same batch and he can do 400+mhz more, argh! :)

Posted

I have four 2500K here. Batch L051A869, SN are 2L047225A1607,1608,1609,1610.

For 24/7 use they all clock exactly the same (4800 1.34v, 4900 1.38v linx) but max bootable multiplier is different on all four chips (using exact same settings): x52/x52/x54/x51

 

my personal view: batch for maximum overclock = witchhunt

Posted

i know batch number doesn't mean much, but right now it's all i can check because i have no mobo.

 

2600k > L041C107 (1349)

it's not listed here, and i got only one hit(hardwareluxx)in google with this batch, i'll report back when it's tested

Posted

My ex-2600k (sold)

 

L040B225

(sorry i didnt write down the cpu 4 digit)

 

Air-cooled

 

Benchable @ 5.2-5.3 Ghz

 

http://hwbot.org/community/submission/2120667_tasos_3dmark_vantage___performance_geforce_gtx_570_29397_marks

 

http://hwbot.org/community/submission/2117313_tasos_wprime_1024m_core_i7_2600k_2min_25sec_532ms

 

Max bench @ 5320

http://hwbot.org/community/submission/2110896_tasos_superpi_core_i7_2600k_6sec_969ms

 

 

//

 

P.S.

Now i'm on a new 2600k

L042B074

Which is a 5.4-5.5 Ghz

Still testing

Posted (edited)
Gotcha. That doesn't apply to the Asus boards when you OC with turbo multi though does it? For example most of my chips can get to the windows load screen at 55x+ turbo multi but they can't actually get past the windows loading page into the desktop. Testing on SS now and tested high volts, doesn't help me get higher and none of these chips is going to actually finish booting 55x+.

 

this is a quite interesting information - thanks for sharing :)

 

edit: so finding the maximum multiplier seems to be more easy on gigabyte boards?

Edited by oanvoanc
Posted
this is a quite interesting information - thanks for sharing :)

 

edit: so finding the maximum multiplier seems to be more easy on gigabyte boards?

 

yes but i might add, I'm on cold water and even though you can post a multi doesn't mean its stable.

 

L050A933 chips seem to need excessive amounts of voltage. I would avoid that batch alltogehter, even if you did find a 55X chip i doubt it could be tamed on anything but ln2.

 

8c water can't even get a wprime 1024m off at 5.4.......they seem to be decent enough low leakage chips though, 1.30 for 4.5 prime stable.

Posted (edited)

Hey massman.

 

Lets start requesting default VID of batches along with the other info :) just becasue a chip has a decent multi doesn't make it good.

 

Also have a hunch that within certain batches multi is tied into VID somehow ;)

 

2600K L050A933 2210 54 X not 5.4 wprime 1024 stable.

 

2600K L042B208 4508 51X didn't waste my time.

 

2500K L046B078 2573 52X seems to be very decent for 24/7 low vid, 1.325 bios set LLC L2 4800 prime stable

 

EDIT more chips from my bench partner

 

2600K

L041C108 2350 5.4

L041C108 3832 5.5

Edited by chew*
Posted (edited)

Getting closer to figuring this out.

 

L041C108 4244

 

56X 5700 with bclk.

 

Another

 

L041C108 4XXX

 

56X lock splash 55X boots still testing max.......5665 so far, this is all stock cooler with some cold.

Edited by chew*
Posted

guys i found this one on a german site:

 

http://www.hardwareluxx.de/community/16325676-post1246.html

 

Asus Maximus IV Extreme: Multi 53/54 (54 nur mit 99,2)

Asus P8P67 Deluxe: Multi 53

Asus P8P67 WS Revolution: Multi 53

Asrock P67 Pro3: Multi 52 (aber höher nicht getestet)

Gigabyte P67A-UD4: Multi 52

 

Mit dem UD4 lag das Maximum bei 52, es lief einfach nicht höher. Alle Boards mit selber CPU und Ram getestet.

 

translated:

the guy used the same chip and same ram on different boards to figure out the max multiplier...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...