February 15, 201114 yr Hmmm, you must of missed my post #84 of my chip. http://www.hwbot.org/forum/showpost.php?p=92663&postcount=84 Either way new high for me: 2600k 5640.6 MHz Batch # - L041B229 Serial # - 1422 http://www.hwbot.org/community/submission/2123096_drnip_cpu_z_core_i7_2600k_5640.57_mhz EDIT: I found it. You have mine under L041B299 whereas mine is L041B229. Edited February 15, 201114 yr by drnip
February 16, 201114 yr L038A670 2201 5350MHZ air & L038A670 2190 5447MHZ AIR OR LN2 http://hwbot.org/community/submission/2126240_
February 16, 201114 yr 2x2500k new my last 2 tries on sandy since its pretty much obsolete with 990x L045B311 #2475 L041B541 #0114 Let ya know tonight
February 16, 201114 yr L045B311 #2475 Max 4.97mhz lol @ 50x99.5 wprime1024 stable and not a mhz more! oh well Try next one now
February 17, 201114 yr damn thats bad luck splave but I will tell you that i think 2500K will require alot more binning and luck. Day 1 2500K hand picked from looking at 60 boxxes. 5.5 L041B144 0743 2600K Nothing i saw interesting so eeenie meenie miny moe from 60+ boxxes ran out of eenies and meenies...... 5.4 L050A933 0170 Day 2 trip 1 and 2...... Complete lotto, not trying to draw attention returning dead chips 2500K 5.2 L045A932 3171 5.2 L048A? forget 2600K 5.4 L050A933 I forget.....26XX i think.... 5.3 L050A933 2532 Let it cool off a couple days then do another round. Btw no need to bench them, in fact no need to even post windows on giga or overvolt them Boot at 50X with pll overide disabled. No post = 5.4 or less chip. Edited February 17, 201114 yr by chew*
February 17, 201114 yr damn thats bad luck splave but I will tell you that i think 2500K will require alot more binning and luck. Day 1 2500K hand picked 5.5 L041B144 0743 2600K Nothing i saw interesting so eeenie meenie miny moe 5.4 L050A933 0170 Day 2 trip 1 and 2...... 2500K 5.2 L045A932 3171 5.2 L048A? forget 2600K 5.4 L050A933 I forget.....26XX i think.... 5.3 L050A933 2532 Seems like 5.0 to 5.4 is the normal range for chips..
February 19, 201114 yr 2600K L041C106 #0694 5654 *not max* http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1663800
February 19, 201114 yr 2600K L041C106 #0694 5654 *not max* http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1663800 YEEEAAAH! Nice Zen. I'll just forget about the SB chips for now I don't seem to have good luck with them.
February 19, 201114 yr New CPU Core i7 2600K # 4959: 5594 MHz Batch: # L041B739 http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1655044
February 19, 201114 yr Pieter, in the batch list, mine is the L042B076 at 5300mhz. I tried it@ln2 and it maxed out at 5322. If you want to update, I have also the SN: it's 0060 Boblemagnifique has the same batch and he can do 400+mhz more, argh!
February 19, 201114 yr I have four 2500K here. Batch L051A869, SN are 2L047225A1607,1608,1609,1610. For 24/7 use they all clock exactly the same (4800 1.34v, 4900 1.38v linx) but max bootable multiplier is different on all four chips (using exact same settings): x52/x52/x54/x51 my personal view: batch for maximum overclock = witchhunt
February 19, 201114 yr i know batch number doesn't mean much, but right now it's all i can check because i have no mobo. 2600k > L041C107 (1349) it's not listed here, and i got only one hit(hardwareluxx)in google with this batch, i'll report back when it's tested
February 19, 201114 yr My ex-2600k (sold) L040B225 (sorry i didnt write down the cpu 4 digit) Air-cooled Benchable @ 5.2-5.3 Ghz http://hwbot.org/community/submission/2120667_tasos_3dmark_vantage___performance_geforce_gtx_570_29397_marks http://hwbot.org/community/submission/2117313_tasos_wprime_1024m_core_i7_2600k_2min_25sec_532ms Max bench @ 5320 http://hwbot.org/community/submission/2110896_tasos_superpi_core_i7_2600k_6sec_969ms // P.S. Now i'm on a new 2600k L042B074 Which is a 5.4-5.5 Ghz Still testing
February 19, 201114 yr Gotcha. That doesn't apply to the Asus boards when you OC with turbo multi though does it? For example most of my chips can get to the windows load screen at 55x+ turbo multi but they can't actually get past the windows loading page into the desktop. Testing on SS now and tested high volts, doesn't help me get higher and none of these chips is going to actually finish booting 55x+. this is a quite interesting information - thanks for sharing edit: so finding the maximum multiplier seems to be more easy on gigabyte boards? Edited February 19, 201114 yr by oanvoanc
February 19, 201114 yr this is a quite interesting information - thanks for sharing edit: so finding the maximum multiplier seems to be more easy on gigabyte boards? yes but i might add, I'm on cold water and even though you can post a multi doesn't mean its stable. L050A933 chips seem to need excessive amounts of voltage. I would avoid that batch alltogehter, even if you did find a 55X chip i doubt it could be tamed on anything but ln2. 8c water can't even get a wprime 1024m off at 5.4.......they seem to be decent enough low leakage chips though, 1.30 for 4.5 prime stable.
February 20, 201114 yr Hey massman. Lets start requesting default VID of batches along with the other info just becasue a chip has a decent multi doesn't make it good. Also have a hunch that within certain batches multi is tied into VID somehow 2600K L050A933 2210 54 X not 5.4 wprime 1024 stable. 2600K L042B208 4508 51X didn't waste my time. 2500K L046B078 2573 52X seems to be very decent for 24/7 low vid, 1.325 bios set LLC L2 4800 prime stable EDIT more chips from my bench partner 2600K L041C108 2350 5.4 L041C108 3832 5.5 Edited February 20, 201114 yr by chew*
February 20, 201114 yr i7 2600k L040B165 s/n: 1067 Bench stable at 55x100 http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1659451 http://www.hwbot.org/community/submission/2127636_scunnyuk_wprime_1024m_core_i7_2600k_2min_19sec_953ms This will post into bios at 56x but it never gets past the point of detecting hdd / os.
February 20, 201114 yr Getting closer to figuring this out. L041C108 4244 56X 5700 with bclk. Another L041C108 4XXX 56X lock splash 55X boots still testing max.......5665 so far, this is all stock cooler with some cold. Edited February 20, 201114 yr by chew*
February 20, 201114 yr guys i found this one on a german site: http://www.hardwareluxx.de/community/16325676-post1246.html Asus Maximus IV Extreme: Multi 53/54 (54 nur mit 99,2) Asus P8P67 Deluxe: Multi 53 Asus P8P67 WS Revolution: Multi 53 Asrock P67 Pro3: Multi 52 (aber höher nicht getestet) Gigabyte P67A-UD4: Multi 52 Mit dem UD4 lag das Maximum bei 52, es lief einfach nicht höher. Alle Boards mit selber CPU und Ram getestet. translated: the guy used the same chip and same ram on different boards to figure out the max multiplier...
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.