Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

Recommended Posts

Posted

Its as 4100 MHz i7-5960X or similar as i7-6900K at Auto settings=(1475 to 1578 points, depends on multicore settings in BIOS, RAM, OS etc)

 

Single thread of 1700x is similar as i5-4690K (3.9GHz boost) or i7-6900K (3.7 GHz boost) or almost as i7-4770K (3.9GHz boost). It seems, for multithread is no problem boost of 1700x at 3500 MHz or more. For single thread Im sure it is about 3900 MHz (look at FireStrike screen and current CPUZ)

Posted
Hmmmm 2133 C15 mems, who use that in 2017? Can't wait to see it performance with something above 3000MHz...

 

Won't see much over 3200 tight unfortunately

 

Do they disclose the version of r15 since the new one scores 10-15 higher on quad which wasn't available when 5960x was in it's prime.

Posted (edited)

It was expected. Actually it is beyond my expectation on LN2 (the photo says it in the filename), but kind of in line with BW-E.

Next stepping in the future will improve OC potential. Overall it is a nice mainstream platform and AMD are back in the game.

Unfortunately it won't be too interesting for overclock and with extreme cooling with the usual benchmarks for the bot.

 

PS: Wonder if that vcore is detected right. And the other thing is if the 1800X will be "super binned" or 1700X could clock to the same frequencies.

Edited by I.nfraR.ed
Posted

Its what AMD needed for sales. In realworld ive only been able to keep a system on ln2 for 12 hours straight gaming lol. Not 24/7 .

 

Fairly certain vcore is right.

Posted

If that vcore is right, then this is most probably a full pot run.

On normal air/water I don't expect much more than 4.2, maybe some lucky chips could go a little higher, but the limit could also be really close to XFR limit (+100MHz) on the 1800X.

And that is what I "predicted" some weeks ago.

Posted

1800x at 5.15g broke the global 8 core first place for r15 ,but considering the new cb version which didnt exist during the 5960x days,so the 5.15 ryzen should be equal to 5.9Ghz 5960x :D with the old version i think

Posted

But it is still impressive clock to clock comparison :) Really better than I thought. I thought the top 8c/16t will be good as i7-6850K in Cinebenchs a nd reality is really better :) Thumbs up AMD

Posted

If we know Cinebench single score also, thats mean solid comparison about single thread potential. I saw Superpi also, but I cant tell you more guys. But this benchmark is really tooooo legacy in real world, so...

  • Administrators
Posted

I saw game tests and 7700k was way ahead, so I assume single threaded AMD will not be as strong as multi threaded if! the screens were correct, but would be no surprise. AMD made a quantum leap and is competetive at least again, so I will not complain

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...