CherV Posted May 9, 2012 Posted May 9, 2012 I can't test this 'cause I can't validate since last winter. 1.5.6 ? too new Test 1.2.x I've found 1.2.3 and 1.2.4 If we update IE9 why don't update them ? @pro : I've found drivers searching by google I don't think they're so special. @cherv : Is 120hz monitor needed to make trasparent windows in upper left section of monitor ( as your video ) ? No, switch 120Hz you can get extra 10K ~ 15K , 69K is using 100Hz , 120Hz will boost more. Quote
Christian Ney Posted May 9, 2012 Author Posted May 9, 2012 Touch Screen is much faster....!! Tried once with touchpad, my fingers didn't like Quote
Crew Antinomy Posted May 10, 2012 Crew Posted May 10, 2012 Did you ever tested updated edition of DLL files ? I did. They do add much performance but are clearly restricted by the rules. I was testing this back in the days when rules weren't that clear about modifying the files. pro, do I understand correctly that in your TW you have only the windows titles flying around? Is such stuff allowed? Quote
xXSebaSXx Posted May 10, 2012 Posted May 10, 2012 So is anyone here going to drop a hint as to how they're messing with the GDI+ stuff? I haven't been able to figure out how to get the TW test to look like the one on Pro's video. Quote
zeneffect Posted May 10, 2012 Posted May 10, 2012 So is anyone here going to drop a hint as to how they're messing with the GDI+ stuff? I haven't been able to figure out how to get the TW test to look like the one on Pro's video. i havent either. there is a 3rd way Quote
Crew pro Posted May 10, 2012 Crew Posted May 10, 2012 pro, do I understand correctly that in your TW you have only the windows titles flying around? Is such stuff allowed? hey mate, the rest of the windows ARE flying around, the are just black + full transparent Quote
BenchZowner Posted May 10, 2012 Posted May 10, 2012 PC Mark05 has become the most tweakable ( and probably annoying ) benchmark since last year If you want to make the perfect run there are so many variables to take care of, and enough luck to get the best subtests scores at their max value at the very same time, have fun with that Quote
dinos22 Posted May 10, 2012 Posted May 10, 2012 32m is for noobs, 01 same U mad? says a noob umadbra Quote
Crew Leeghoofd Posted May 11, 2012 Crew Posted May 11, 2012 PC Mark05 has become the most tweakable ( and probably annoying ) benchmark since last year If you want to make the perfect run there are so many variables to take care of, and enough luck to get the best subtests scores at their max value at the very same time, have fun with that :nana: PCMARK07 is even more fun :nana: Quote
BenchZowner Posted May 11, 2012 Posted May 11, 2012 :nana: PCMARK07 is even more fun :nana: Yeah, you do that... 3 loops of fun fun fun Quote
l0ud_sil3nc3 Posted May 11, 2012 Posted May 11, 2012 :nana: PCMARK07 is even more fun :nana: don't even say that name:p Quote
zeneffect Posted May 11, 2012 Posted May 11, 2012 don't even say that name:p hey i like pcm7... mvp may be banned but virtu isnt Quote
Tweak-venetica- Posted May 12, 2012 Posted May 12, 2012 heya is somebody willing to help me out .. im having massive problems with the transparent window sub , its killing me !! haha !! i seem to be getting the lowest scores with tweaks this is my last submission ( still trying to tweak ) http://www.hwbot.org/submission/2282780_tweak_venetica__pcmark_2005_phenom_ii_x6_1090t_be_27158_marks here is an image for reference be i have no idea whats going on ( might it help if i said that with core affinity set to 1 or 4/6 i get the same scores ) any help would be appreciated Quote
zeneffect Posted May 12, 2012 Posted May 12, 2012 heya is somebody willing to help me out .. im having massive problems with the transparent window sub , its killing me !! haha !! i seem to be getting the lowest scores with tweaks this is my last submission ( still trying to tweak ) http://www.hwbot.org/submission/2282780_tweak_venetica__pcmark_2005_phenom_ii_x6_1090t_be_27158_marks here is an image for reference http://www.hwbot.org/image/783306.jpgbe i have no idea whats going on ( might it help if i said that with core affinity set to 1 or 4/6 i get the same scores ) any help would be appreciated it looks like bob's tweak isnt taking effect. use pro's directions and it works 100%. also as a hint to transparent windows... setting core affinity on pcmark05.exe does absolutely nothing for the bench. if you manage to set priority, it will fail the benchmark. pcmark05 must be run at normal priority. Quote
Tweak-venetica- Posted May 12, 2012 Posted May 12, 2012 oke that makes sense thanx , ( about affinity ) oke pro's directions .... that would be located on the first page im guessing ? if not . link pleeeez Quote
Tweak-venetica- Posted May 12, 2012 Posted May 12, 2012 okay guys a few guys still having problem with bob tweak, easy way to do it, 1. open pcmark, then open the details tab, where you normally see the game tests displayed 2. change theme to classic 3. lock computer 4. unlock computer 5. you will notice the details tab is now an inverted grey, now you know the tweak has worked 6. change back to aero theme this method ? Quote
I.M.O.G. Posted May 12, 2012 Posted May 12, 2012 Tweak-venetica, we have an easier tweak that works the same as the locking your computer thing. That isn't the tweak thats getting these guys to 60K or higher. Quote
Crew pro Posted May 12, 2012 Crew Posted May 12, 2012 (edited) Crazy new finds gluc, the audio encoding makes sense but I'm scratching my head with latency How is it possible to change memory latency score to that magnitude unless the benchmark incorrectly calculates it? It is unlike any tweak we have seen in any benchmark and is preety crazy, i like it haha Edited May 13, 2012 by pro Quote
Tweak-venetica- Posted May 14, 2012 Posted May 14, 2012 Nice to know I.M.O.G will keep pushing just waiting for a new amd board as mine decided to die Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.