Johni5 Posted June 21, 2012 Share Posted June 21, 2012 Woow.Congratulation! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aniket Posted June 21, 2012 Share Posted June 21, 2012 Congratulation! This time Sabertooth is used for the WR! Asus FTW! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TerraRaptor Posted June 21, 2012 Share Posted June 21, 2012 Was it an offline event? More details? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elsephire Posted June 21, 2012 Share Posted June 21, 2012 Nice Phattai !!!! Very good CPU and very good job!! Great frequency Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luebke Posted June 21, 2012 Share Posted June 21, 2012 at just 1.848 volts? awsome Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jjjc Posted June 21, 2012 Share Posted June 21, 2012 Nice work! Â Another CPU bought close to release? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wizerty Posted June 21, 2012 Share Posted June 21, 2012 Very nice Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K404 Posted June 21, 2012 Share Posted June 21, 2012 (edited) ....................After the AMD MHz of a few weeks ago, is this another bugged result? All the other scores are running over 0.1v higher. Edited June 21, 2012 by K404 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Gappo Posted June 21, 2012 Share Posted June 21, 2012 ^^ Think it's a good idea to require video with top 50 cpu-z. Â A video of how you reach said clocks, not just cpu-z... PScheck, amdod or whatever Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phattai Posted June 21, 2012 Share Posted June 21, 2012 My cpu did not scale well with voltage... (compare to another FX-8150 have tested) already try nearly 1.98V, disable one more core but all worse... loose timing, single channel and suicide F7 that help the most. Procedure: set multiplier via BIOS, boot win around 215-221fsb then increase clock with AISUITE and wish for luck hehehe! Â Thanks all!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xtreme Addict Posted June 21, 2012 Share Posted June 21, 2012 Good job! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wizerty Posted June 21, 2012 Share Posted June 21, 2012 " Procedure: set multiplier via BIOS, boot win around 215-221fsb then increase clock with AISUITE and wish for luck hehehe! "  really ? No pscheck ? and both core @8.6 ? Hmmm it look like a bug   Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phattai Posted June 21, 2012 Share Posted June 21, 2012 no pscheck but k10stat is OK, m8! AFAIK 2 cores is the best for this cpu Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
amdnord Posted June 21, 2012 Share Posted June 21, 2012 is k10stat updated to work with BDs? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wizerty Posted June 21, 2012 Share Posted June 21, 2012 Both core at full speed ? OR you raise up only the 2nd ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mehdi_FXX Posted June 21, 2012 Share Posted June 21, 2012 8.6 GHZ is rly sick! Congrats Bro;) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flanker Posted June 21, 2012 Share Posted June 21, 2012 nice! Whats your FX batch? Can you see at it? Thank you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I.M.O.G. Posted June 21, 2012 Share Posted June 21, 2012 Nice result. New chip or old chip? Â From your method, sounds like you did both cores at 8.6... which is REALLY nuts. Good work. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeepBeep2 Posted June 22, 2012 Share Posted June 22, 2012 What is the normal difference in freq between best core in a CU and best CU usually? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I.M.O.G. Posted June 22, 2012 Share Posted June 22, 2012 Less than 100mhz on my 8.2 chip. But 2 cores at a time gave out before 8ghz. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Gappo Posted July 4, 2012 Share Posted July 4, 2012 is k10stat updated to work with BDs? Â Nope... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
amdnord Posted July 5, 2012 Share Posted July 5, 2012 Nope... Â so something is wrong here or we are doing it wrong, lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knopflerbruce Posted July 5, 2012 Share Posted July 5, 2012 Well, should be a piece of cake to show a superpi screenshot at 8 GHz+ with proper performance. That should help if there's something unbelieavable here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christian Ney Posted July 5, 2012 Share Posted July 5, 2012 Guys from CPUZ took a closer look at it and something was wrong, therefore it has been rejected and I will block it here Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TaPaKaH Posted July 5, 2012 Share Posted July 5, 2012 so Andre's backup was unnecessary Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.