June 21, 201213 yr ....................After the AMD MHz of a few weeks ago, is this another bugged result? All the other scores are running over 0.1v higher. Edited June 21, 201213 yr by K404
June 21, 201213 yr ^^ Think it's a good idea to require video with top 50 cpu-z. A video of how you reach said clocks, not just cpu-z... PScheck, amdod or whatever
June 21, 201213 yr My cpu did not scale well with voltage... (compare to another FX-8150 have tested) already try nearly 1.98V, disable one more core but all worse... loose timing, single channel and suicide F7 that help the most. Procedure: set multiplier via BIOS, boot win around 215-221fsb then increase clock with AISUITE and wish for luck hehehe! Thanks all!!!
June 21, 201213 yr " Procedure: set multiplier via BIOS, boot win around 215-221fsb then increase clock with AISUITE and wish for luck hehehe! " really ? No pscheck ? and both core @8.6 ? Hmmm it look like a bug
June 21, 201213 yr Nice result. New chip or old chip? From your method, sounds like you did both cores at 8.6... which is REALLY nuts. Good work.
June 22, 201213 yr What is the normal difference in freq between best core in a CU and best CU usually?
July 5, 201213 yr Well, should be a piece of cake to show a superpi screenshot at 8 GHz+ with proper performance. That should help if there's something unbelieavable here.
July 5, 201213 yr Guys from CPUZ took a closer look at it and something was wrong, therefore it has been rejected and I will block it here
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.