Oh, you've opened the .jar file.

 

First install Java, then extract the downloaded .zip file. With Java installed, you should then see the .jar file correctly.

Oh, you've opened the .jar file.

 

First install Java, then extract the downloaded .zip file. With Java installed, you should then see the .jar file correctly.

 

Ah, I see know. I downloaded it then extracted it to move it over to the bench PC. Thanks Massman.

Yes, it works. So we can use this new version for the CC?

 

You can use which version works best for you, I encourage the new one as I don't have time to manually fix scorefiles for 2.26/2.27, especially since this is going to be a pretty active stage.

If MM wants to declare that any 'Dual Graphics' AMD solution (which will be in the GPU-Z name, and should probably get its own HWBot category) is fine then I'm ok with that, but as it is written, the list above I provided is what's required.

 

It needs to be a Hybrid category, so your list is correct. If a combination is not a Hybrid category, it will not be considered as such.

You can use which version works best for you, I encourage the new one as I don't have time to manually fix scorefiles for 2.26/2.27, especially since this is going to be a pretty active stage.

 

There's some problem with single core A64. It was simply not starting the bench.

If I kill the wrapper then the aquamark loads, otherwise it just displays 2 "windows" half-open - one white for the wrapper and one black for aquamark. Using auto settings.

However it works on my multi-core 24/7 machine. Maybe it's my crippled XP, I don't know.

Edited November 10, 201311 yr by I.nfraR.ed

There's some problem with single core A64. It was simply not starting the bench.

If I kill the wrapper then the aquamark loads, otherwise it just displays 2 "windows" half-open - one white for the wrapper and one black for aquamark. Using auto settings.

However it works on my multi-core 24/7 machine. Maybe it's my crippled XP, I don't know.

 

Not working for me either. Bench starts and runs without issue but scores are never transferred to the wrapper for submission. When I save I get 0 for all tests. Also on stripped XP install. PII x4 965 BE.

Is this with the new version of Aquamark wrapper? V 2.26 work fine with my FX-60 and stripped down XP. It wouldn't identify the chip proper but I figured it was because even the BIOS didn't recognize the chip.

Is this with the new version of Aquamark wrapper? V 2.26 work fine with my FX-60 and stripped down XP. It wouldn't identify the chip proper but I figured it was because even the BIOS didn't recognize the chip.

Yes, newest version. 2.26/2.27 worked fine for me too, except for a couple small things.

Not working for me either. Bench starts and runs without issue but scores are never transferred to the wrapper for submission. When I save I get 0 for all tests. Also on stripped XP install. PII x4 965 BE.

 

See if it works in MANUAL mode. Also make sure you run as admin and do NOT have My Documents opened in explorer. I will update it tomorrow to save the log outside the scorefile so I can debug your issue(s).

 

There's some problem with single core A64. It was simply not starting the bench.

 

The startup is slow due some additional detection of used gfx ports. You can disable System Info, that should start it instantly (there is a .reg file in the installation folder). If wrapper started but bench didn't, try in Manual mode and check task manager for any aquamark3.exe that didn't close previously (if it is the case).

Edited November 10, 201311 yr by GENiEBEN

See if it works in MANUAL mode. Also make sure you run as admin and do NOT have My Documents opened in explorer. I will update it tomorrow to save the log outside the scorefile so I can debug your issue(s).

 

Makes no difference auto or manual. The scores are never transferred and even if I try to save the empty file, the app crashes to desktop. Tested on my daily machine, same thing happens.

Fermi PCI card inbound lmao this is fun!

Is it allowed to run 3dm03 without systeminfo?

My hybrid and integrated setup seems to have a problem starting the benchmark ("3DMark has stopped working"), but it was doing fine if the systeminfo was disabled.

 

Thanks,

Darn the UP4 just caught fire...

The FM2 Board? I also just ordered my 2nd one.

Lol

Can anybody scale past about 1263mhz on the 8670D/6800K? I'm using the tdp tool stilt released and my score is still going to crap no matter what I'm benching with more clocks. UP4 board.

Same problem here.

 

And with 5800K/7660D I can't pass 1382 MHz

 

Ofcourse my score will suck monkey balls, but who cares sorry don't ask for bios screenies the board is a goner...

Edited November 11, 201311 yr by Leeghoofd

I don't know about 7660D but getting the clocks is fine, it's the score that blows after it.

 

Strange too because say 1260 will be fast, then 1350 (approx) will be slow but 1450 (approx) will be faster than 1350 but slower than 1260. Seems weird

Is it the same thing The Stilt built an application for?

 

http://forum.hwbot.org/showthread.php?p=269267

Catzilla sometimes behaves erratic too, sometimes the Physics score is insanely low, you reboot and it's up again, then the other subtests score lower... feels like pcmark, you need that lucky run to get it coming together...

 

For me the benchmark hardly scaled after 1350 on the 5800K, when we benched the 6800K the board halted our tries at 1200 so we got close to Jacks score on air lol

The real clock doesnt change on my setup. No matter if I set 1400 or 1500 the real clock is still just 1382 MHz.

 

Maybe I should try to tool of Stilt

 

 

The real clock doesnt change on my setup. No matter if I set 1400 or 1500 the real clock is still just 1382 MHz.

 

It could be bug of GPU-Z, I had the same bug many times.

Maybe try F4 bios Roman, your Physx scores also lower with 100Mhz more on the CPU, run rerun till it get's it right...

I can set the clocks from bios and it shows in gpu-z altough only in 120mhz or so steps. It almost feels like the gpu jumps onto a new divider when the clocks go up which is bringing performance down, is that a possibility?