robbo2 Posted November 10, 2013 Share Posted November 10, 2013 Yeh tried that for days and no joy error 400 bad request. I give up you win hwbot prime!! At least you can get it to run. Downloaded from bot website, installed SDK and can't find a .jar file anywhere. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted November 10, 2013 Author Share Posted November 10, 2013 Huh? It should just be in the .zip file ... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robbo2 Posted November 10, 2013 Share Posted November 10, 2013 Huh? It should just be in the .zip file ... I've downloaded twice and this is what's there. Am I blind or something? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted November 10, 2013 Author Share Posted November 10, 2013 Oh, you've opened the .jar file. First install Java, then extract the downloaded .zip file. With Java installed, you should then see the .jar file correctly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robbo2 Posted November 10, 2013 Share Posted November 10, 2013 Oh, you've opened the .jar file. First install Java, then extract the downloaded .zip file. With Java installed, you should then see the .jar file correctly. Ah, I see know. I downloaded it then extracted it to move it over to the bench PC. Thanks Massman. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GENiEBEN Posted November 10, 2013 Share Posted November 10, 2013 Yes, it works. So we can use this new version for the CC? You can use which version works best for you, I encourage the new one as I don't have time to manually fix scorefiles for 2.26/2.27, especially since this is going to be a pretty active stage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted November 10, 2013 Author Share Posted November 10, 2013 If MM wants to declare that any 'Dual Graphics' AMD solution (which will be in the GPU-Z name, and should probably get its own HWBot category) is fine then I'm ok with that, but as it is written, the list above I provided is what's required. It needs to be a Hybrid category, so your list is correct. If a combination is not a Hybrid category, it will not be considered as such. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I.nfraR.ed Posted November 10, 2013 Share Posted November 10, 2013 (edited) You can use which version works best for you, I encourage the new one as I don't have time to manually fix scorefiles for 2.26/2.27, especially since this is going to be a pretty active stage. There's some problem with single core A64. It was simply not starting the bench. If I kill the wrapper then the aquamark loads, otherwise it just displays 2 "windows" half-open - one white for the wrapper and one black for aquamark. Using auto settings. However it works on my multi-core 24/7 machine. Maybe it's my crippled XP, I don't know. Edited November 10, 2013 by I.nfraR.ed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.Scott Posted November 10, 2013 Share Posted November 10, 2013 There's some problem with single core A64. It was simply not starting the bench. If I kill the wrapper then the aquamark loads, otherwise it just displays 2 "windows" half-open - one white for the wrapper and one black for aquamark. Using auto settings. However it works on my multi-core 24/7 machine. Maybe it's my crippled XP, I don't know. Not working for me either. Bench starts and runs without issue but scores are never transferred to the wrapper for submission. When I save I get 0 for all tests. Also on stripped XP install. PII x4 965 BE. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rasparthe Posted November 10, 2013 Share Posted November 10, 2013 Is this with the new version of Aquamark wrapper? V 2.26 work fine with my FX-60 and stripped down XP. It wouldn't identify the chip proper but I figured it was because even the BIOS didn't recognize the chip. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.Scott Posted November 10, 2013 Share Posted November 10, 2013 Is this with the new version of Aquamark wrapper? V 2.26 work fine with my FX-60 and stripped down XP. It wouldn't identify the chip proper but I figured it was because even the BIOS didn't recognize the chip. Yes, newest version. 2.26/2.27 worked fine for me too, except for a couple small things. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GENiEBEN Posted November 10, 2013 Share Posted November 10, 2013 (edited) Not working for me either. Bench starts and runs without issue but scores are never transferred to the wrapper for submission. When I save I get 0 for all tests. Also on stripped XP install. PII x4 965 BE. See if it works in MANUAL mode. Also make sure you run as admin and do NOT have My Documents opened in explorer. I will update it tomorrow to save the log outside the scorefile so I can debug your issue(s). There's some problem with single core A64. It was simply not starting the bench. The startup is slow due some additional detection of used gfx ports. You can disable System Info, that should start it instantly (there is a .reg file in the installation folder). If wrapper started but bench didn't, try in Manual mode and check task manager for any aquamark3.exe that didn't close previously (if it is the case). Edited November 10, 2013 by GENiEBEN Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.Scott Posted November 10, 2013 Share Posted November 10, 2013 See if it works in MANUAL mode. Also make sure you run as admin and do NOT have My Documents opened in explorer. I will update it tomorrow to save the log outside the scorefile so I can debug your issue(s). Makes no difference auto or manual. The scores are never transferred and even if I try to save the empty file, the app crashes to desktop. Tested on my daily machine, same thing happens. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Splave Posted November 10, 2013 Share Posted November 10, 2013 Fermi PCI card inbound lmao this is fun! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lucky_n00b Posted November 11, 2013 Share Posted November 11, 2013 Is it allowed to run 3dm03 without systeminfo? My hybrid and integrated setup seems to have a problem starting the benchmark ("3DMark has stopped working"), but it was doing fine if the systeminfo was disabled. Thanks, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Leeghoofd Posted November 11, 2013 Crew Share Posted November 11, 2013 Darn the UP4 just caught fire... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
der8auer Posted November 11, 2013 Share Posted November 11, 2013 The FM2 Board? I also just ordered my 2nd one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moose83 Posted November 11, 2013 Share Posted November 11, 2013 Lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jjjc Posted November 11, 2013 Share Posted November 11, 2013 Can anybody scale past about 1263mhz on the 8670D/6800K? I'm using the tdp tool stilt released and my score is still going to crap no matter what I'm benching with more clocks. UP4 board. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
der8auer Posted November 11, 2013 Share Posted November 11, 2013 Same problem here. And with 5800K/7660D I can't pass 1382 MHz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Leeghoofd Posted November 11, 2013 Crew Share Posted November 11, 2013 (edited) Ofcourse my score will suck monkey balls, but who cares sorry don't ask for bios screenies the board is a goner... Edited November 11, 2013 by Leeghoofd Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jjjc Posted November 11, 2013 Share Posted November 11, 2013 I don't know about 7660D but getting the clocks is fine, it's the score that blows after it. Strange too because say 1260 will be fast, then 1350 (approx) will be slow but 1450 (approx) will be faster than 1350 but slower than 1260. Seems weird Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted November 11, 2013 Author Share Posted November 11, 2013 Is it the same thing The Stilt built an application for? http://forum.hwbot.org/showthread.php?p=269267 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Leeghoofd Posted November 11, 2013 Crew Share Posted November 11, 2013 Catzilla sometimes behaves erratic too, sometimes the Physics score is insanely low, you reboot and it's up again, then the other subtests score lower... feels like pcmark, you need that lucky run to get it coming together... For me the benchmark hardly scaled after 1350 on the 5800K, when we benched the 6800K the board halted our tries at 1200 so we got close to Jacks score on air lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
der8auer Posted November 11, 2013 Share Posted November 11, 2013 The real clock doesnt change on my setup. No matter if I set 1400 or 1500 the real clock is still just 1382 MHz. Maybe I should try to tool of Stilt Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.