Submission & member moderation

I cannot find this cpu in the database. http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1731443 can you please add it? thanks

can i ask why pcmark vantage scores can get any points?? Thank you in advance

http://www.hwbot.org/searchResults.do?direction=&applicationId=14&cpu=Opteron+1210&numberOfProcessors=1&gpu=&numberOfVideocards=0&manufacturer=&chipset=&model=&memManufacturer=&memType=&memProduct=&minCpuFreq=&maxCpuFreq=&minGpuCoreFreq=&maxGpuCoreFreq=&minGpuMemFreq=&maxGpuMemFreq=&minMemFreq=&maxMemFreq=&countryId=0&teamId=0&userName=&minScore=&maxScore=&displayAdvanced=false&filterBlocked=&filterUser=&filterVerification=&imageAttached=&dateFrom=&dateUntil=&system=&minTotalPoints=&gpuId=0&cpuId=1171&chipsetId=0&modelId=0&amp…

Hi ! Please , delete that submisions , I am clearing my submisions , Thank's ! http://hwbot.org/community/submission/1045457_ximi_unigine_heaven___xtreme_preset_dx11_radeon_hd_5970_1424.93_dx11_marks http://hwbot.org/community/submission/1044792_ximi_unigine_heaven___xtreme_preset_dx11_radeon_hd_5970_1131.95_dx11_marks http://hwbot.org/community/submission/1044720_ximi_unigine_heaven___xtreme_preset_dx11_radeon_hd_5970_1089.32_dx11_marks http://hwbot.org/community/submission/1042194_ximi_unigine_heaven___xtreme_preset_dx11_2x_radeon_hd_5870_1083.46_dx11_marks

score from Windows XP // Windows 7 is different I search database and see result mixed up with many Windows version

Why doesn't my submission in the HWBOT ranking earn any points? http://hwbot.org/community/submission/2142095_oc_basilea_superpi_phenom_ii_x3_720_be_13sec_822ms Can I delete this submission and upload it again? What do I have to do? Please help!

First of all, my heart goes to people of Japan for the tragedy that they have gone through in the last few days. And I am glad none of our overclocking brothers have directly suffered. But now, though I try to steer away from problems, but while looking at 2600K results, I could not help but notice that atleast 15 chips(overclockers) which can do above 5600Mhz, all landed in Japan?? Should this be looked into??? I have tested myself around 10 2600K's to find one which can do above 5600Mhz and still its not a Golden Chip since needs far too more volts than the ones which are really golden.

I cannot submit reference clock. thanks

Just looking through top scores for dual card (2gpu) runs for 3dm06 and notice the first 3 all have runs on XP with SLI disabled. Can they still be counted as dual card runs?

Hi. I have AMD Athlon™ II X2 220 - http://products.amd.com/en-us/DesktopCPUDetail.aspx?id=723&f1=AMD+Athlon%E2%84%A2+II+X2&f2=220&f3=2800&f4=512&f5=AM3&f6=C3&f7=45nm+SOI&f8=65+W&f9=4000&f10=False&f11=False&f12=True But I can not find it in the database. How can I publish my results?

Should they be counted if ROG expander isnt even on the market?? I thought unreleased meant no points?

So I recently purchased a I3-560 and a Asus P7P55D-E LX to build a new rig for my wife and I decided to run some benchmarks on it before I set it all up for her. Well, its going great except for the fact that my submissions for 3DMark Vantage and 06, actually all of my GPU test don't receive any points. Any one have any ideas on how I can fix this. Thanks, Jake Here is the link to one of the scores that didn't receive any points. Doing a search on the I3-5650 will also show my submissions but on points. http://hwbot.org/community/submission/2135771_jcocanour_3dmark_vantage___performance_geforce_gtx_580_23366_marks

Moderator - please delete this submission as it is showing 4 cores not 2. http://hwbot.org/community/submission/2135777_overpaqd_pcmark_vantage_core_2_e8600_3.33ghz_10547_marks I will resubmit. Cheers

hi i dont know if here is the right place but there is no ati mobilty 5430 in data base plz add it thx

here is the score : http://hwbot.org/community/submission/2123035_dblooi_cpu_z_fusion_e_350_2400.3_mhz using CPUZ 1.56 showing 10x 240 Mhz(120 Mhz real as it's double data rate) so real should be 1'200 Mhz ? I think the real CPU Speed is 1'200 Mhz here he used the fact of wrong reading to submite. Even his WPrime submission, WPrime is showing 1'920 Mhz which is right : 16 x 120 Mhz Mine is 16 x 100 Mhz @ stock so FSB is 200 Mhz using CPUZ 1.57 (latest version) which is 100 % right, cause I know and chose 16 x 100 Mhz in da BIOS Am I right ? I am 100 % sure but even in this case I ask, we are humans

Very, very, very suspicious, all within 1 mhz of each other? We all know how likely it is to have that many different chips top out at the same place.

Benching today in -10 degrees C in the garage... I updated my Bios from F5 to F6 today on my Gigabyte board to see if this would help my voltage and Temps and especially my OVP/OTP issues that has been plagueing me... did a few 5.4-5.7sec runs in wprime.... on this run, my screen started to flicker on and off. and then I see this... I'm stunned... then I finally get 2 CPU-Z windows open and my PC was running awfull my mouse pointer was stuttering bad and it took nearly 2 minutes just to get the 2 cpu-z windows open and in place... then it seemed like my PC crashed so I grabbed my camera and took a shot of the monitor then after another 5-10 minutes I finally was a…

another easy question for someone. as the title says, how do we assign team moderators?

so a few of us have taken on admin responsibilities for our team recently. we are trying our best to organise/monitor the members. one member in particular has had 2 suspect results. the first score had points deleted by hwbot. now there is another score by the same member, with the same hardware, and the same inconsistencies. we are stumped on what to do, as we have no proof, other than the submitted score itself. so what do we do?

http://hwbot.org/community/submission/818726_azesmbog_wprime_32m_2x_pentium_3_550mhz_coppermine_2min_20sec_80ms?tab=info Says in the system info TUSL2-C which is a single-cpu board, but the submission is for 2x cpu's. Probably human error, but still.

"Reported by user due to wrong hardware match (to match point for cpu 2.2Mhz and for 9600m gt with DDR2)" j'en ai plein le cul de poster des premières places qui sont discrédités par les " seconds " par pure jalousie alors qu'eux même postent des screens qui ne respectent pas les règles !!!!. va falloir faire le ménage sur ce site, parce que l'impartialité doit être de mise ! je peux citer "zema" et toute la clique du dessous qui se permettent de dire que mon score cpu n'est pas possible sans pour autant regarder mes autres benchs, y'a pas que la fréquence dans la vie. ils feraient mieux de regarder de plus près leurs propres screens. existe t'i…

This Pi Fast time appears to have errors in computation: http://hwbot.org/community/submission/606143_vampirs_pifast_athlon_64_3200_newcastle_48.98_sec See the supporting image: http://hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=20188&thumb=false&iehack=.jpg

This one looks like a P4 1.7 erroneously entered as a P4 1.5 category. Note that CPUZ and WPrime both show that the processor is a 1.7, not a 1.5. Shouldn't it be moved to the correct category? It was reported the normal way, but no action was taken by the moderator - just shows "checked by a moderator". Please look at the images: http://hwbot.org/community/submission/639797_manny_wprime_1024m_pentium_4_1.5ghz_willamette_s423_1h_41min_8sec_0ms http://hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=36829&thumb=false&iehack=.jpg

It has come to my attention that there has been some disagreement amongst hwbot staff over these accounts. As the operator of Overclockers.com, and having met Dejo once in person, I am interested in resolving any uncertainties. My understanding is that similar submissions, and the timeframe on submissions, has aroused uncertainty regarding if both accounts are legit. Is that what the problem is perceived to be from hwbot staff? If so, please inform me of any materials you require. Proof of purchase for separate GPU for 3D and separate CPU for 2D can be provided. Dejo's real name is Jonnie, and his daughter is October. He volunteered to host the Overclockers.c…

Athlon 64 3200+ Winchester Pi Fast points were awarded to M.Beier even though he chose NOT to participate in the HW Bot rankings. Shouldn't those points be awarded instead to those members below him who did choose to participate in the rankings? See both of the web pages linked below: http://www.hwbot.org/hardware/processor/athlon_64_3200_winchester?tab=2drankings#/manufacturer.rankings.do?applicationId=6&manufacturer=amd&hardwareTypeId=CPU_263&hardwareType=CPU&tabid=cpubenchmarks http://www.hwbot.org/community/submission/593396_m.beier_pifast_athlon_64_3200_winchester_43.34_sec ==========================================================…