May 17, 201015 yr http://hwbot.org/community/submission/1000210_ribeirocross_cpu_z_sempron_2200_athlon_xp_2426_mhzThink we can get this put in the right category? It's obviously not a Sempron. tia This entry now says checked by moderator. Show me another Sempron 2200+ with a multiplier that isn't 9x on a NF2 motherboard. It's not possible. This entry is an AXP 2200+, in the wrong category.
May 17, 201015 yr This entry now says checked by moderator.Show me another Sempron 2200+ with a multiplier that isn't 9x on a NF2 motherboard. It's not possible. This entry is an AXP 2200+, in the wrong category. as I have explained to an other user by PM, I have bugged! I heve moderated something like 100 results tonight so shits happen ... I have edited the result my bad
May 17, 201015 yr as I have explained to an other user by PM, I have bugged! I heve moderated something like 100 results tonight so shits happen ... I have edited the result my bad It's all good brother, I wasn't criticizing you. Just double checking. You do a fine job here and I understand mistakes happen.
May 17, 201015 yr Crew This entry now says checked by moderator.Show me another Sempron 2200+ with a multiplier that isn't 9x on a NF2 motherboard. It's not possible. This entry is an AXP 2200+, in the wrong category. And this is not the only innuendo
May 18, 201015 yr It's all good brother, I wasn't criticizing you. Just double checking. You do a fine job here and I understand mistakes happen. Now if we could fix the points and silverware, that would be outstanding. http://hwbot.org/searchResults.do?direction=&applicationId=13&cpu=Sempron+2200%2B+%28Athlon+XP%29&numberOfProcessors=1&gpu=&numberOfVideocards=0&manufacturer=&chipset=&model=&memManufacturer=&memType=&memProduct=&minCpuFreq=&maxCpuFreq=&minGpuCoreFreq=&maxGpuCoreFreq=&minGpuMemFreq=&maxGpuMemFreq=&minMemFreq=&maxMemFreq=&countryId=0&teamId=0&userName=&minScore=&maxScore=&displayAdvanced=false&filterBlocked=&filterUser=&filterVerification=&imageAttached=&dateFrom=&dateUntil=&system=&minTotalPoints=&gpuId=0&cpuId=541&chipsetId=0&modelId=0&manufacturerId=0&memManufacturerId=&memProductId=&memTypeId=&offset=0
May 22, 201015 yr My recently single E4500 scores are coming up as 4x core scores, i checked and 1x is selected, i reported 'em and someone checked them but didn't make them into dual cores. These: http://hwbot.org/community/submission/1005670_bobnova_wprime_1024m_core_2_e4500_2.2ghz_9min_37sec_827ms http://hwbot.org/community/submission/1005671_bobnova_wprime_32m_core_2_e4500_2.2ghz_17sec_693ms
May 26, 201015 yr Dear moderators I found today that my best 1xGPU 3Dmark 2006 score earns no point on both 1xGPU global and HD5870 HW point. http://hwbot.org/community/submission/998124_gyrock_3dmark_2006_radeon_hd_5870_34166_marks saying that "not Gyrock’s best 3Dmark 2006 submission, only best is ranked". But this is my best result of 3DM06 with 1xGPU. http://hwbot.org/listResults.do?userId=27000&applicationId=12 could you please check it and, if something wrong, fix it? Thank you
June 10, 201014 yr http://hwbot.org/forum/showthread.php?t=8070 In the above link the submission clearly states that it is a dual processor submission, yet it's in and scored as a single processor. Can we fix this and restore the proper points and silverware to the single processor class? tia EDIT - noticed points were removed, but still need to fix points and silverware. tia again. Edited June 10, 201014 yr by Mr.Scott
June 11, 201014 yr http://hwbot.org/community/submission/563701_aspstein_wprime_1024m_athlon_mp_1900_27min_9sec_330ms?tab=info Same problem as above post, here too.
June 11, 201014 yr should be fixed Yeah......not so much. http://hwbot.org/searchResults.do?direction=&applicationId=15&cpu=Athlon+MP+1900%2B&numberOfProcessors=0&gpu=&numberOfVideocards=0&manufacturer=&chipset=&model=&memManufacturer=&memType=&memProduct=&minCpuFreq=&maxCpuFreq=&minGpuCoreFreq=&maxGpuCoreFreq=&minGpuMemFreq=&maxGpuMemFreq=&minMemFreq=&maxMemFreq=&countryId=0&teamId=0&userName=&minScore=&maxScore=&displayAdvanced=false&filterBlocked=&filterUser=&filterVerification=&imageAttached=&dateFrom=&dateUntil=&system=&minTotalPoints=&gpuId=0&cpuId=1126&chipsetId=0&modelId=0&manufacturerId=0&memManufacturerId=&memProductId=&memTypeId=&offset=0 http://hwbot.org/searchResults.do?direction=&applicationId=14&cpu=Athlon+MP+1900%2B&numberOfProcessors=0&gpu=&numberOfVideocards=0&manufacturer=&chipset=&model=&memManufacturer=&memType=&memProduct=&minCpuFreq=&maxCpuFreq=&minGpuCoreFreq=&maxGpuCoreFreq=&minGpuMemFreq=&maxGpuMemFreq=&minMemFreq=&maxMemFreq=&countryId=0&teamId=0&userName=&minScore=&maxScore=&displayAdvanced=false&filterBlocked=&filterUser=&filterVerification=&imageAttached=&dateFrom=&dateUntil=&system=&minTotalPoints=&gpuId=0&cpuId=1126&chipsetId=0&modelId=0&manufacturerId=0&memManufacturerId=&memProductId=&memTypeId=&offset=0 In both of these, the first 2 entries are the same rig. Instead of 2 points and a gold for each, it should be 2 points and a gold for the first one (2x CPU's) and no points for the second entry( still 2x CPU's). Then, all the single CPU entries need the proper points and silverware. Get my drift?
June 12, 201014 yr I am just taking it case by case bro What about now? Yeah baby, now you're on it. Thanks again brother.
June 14, 201014 yr Demiurg blocked two score incorrect, and while Thor checked them already one of me : http://hwbot.org/community/submission/949613_chiller_3dmark_vantage___performance_geforce_gts_250_9095_marks and from other member: http://hwbot.org/community/submission/979213_awalleyeguy_3dmark_vantage___performance_geforce_gts_250_9568_marks This is not the way to block CORRECT scores while the cpu scores are correct, and normal for that cpu 980X. As mod you need to know that what the normal cpu score is with 980X.
June 14, 201014 yr normal cpu socre and they block it? they look at GpuZ and there is PhysX on. Why ? GpuZ gives that the option PhysX is on in the driver. But when you disable PPU in vanatge this option still stays on in GpuZ. second : the cpu scores are normaal at given cpu speed, otherwise it was +70K cpu score or so, and not 40K with a 980X OCed, just like all my scores of vanatge. i always disable PPU in vantage and not driver. They should know this as a moderator. PS : i whant to send my solicitation sheet for getting a score moderator here on hwbot. To who i need to send that?
July 13, 201014 yr http://hwbot.org/searchResults.do?direction=&applicationId=15&cpu=Athlon+X2+5000&numberOfProcessors=1&gpu=&numberOfVideocards=0&manufacturer=&chipset=&model=&memManufacturer=&memType=&memProduct=&minCpuFreq=&maxCpuFreq=&minGpuCoreFreq=&maxGpuCoreFreq=&minGpuMemFreq=&maxGpuMemFreq=&minMemFreq=&maxMemFreq=&countryId=0&teamId=0&userName=&minScore=&maxScore=&displayAdvanced=false&filterBlocked=&filterUser=&filterVerification=&imageAttached=&dateFrom=&dateUntil=&system=&minTotalPoints=&gpuId=0&cpuId=2034&chipsetId=0&modelId=0&manufacturerId=0&memManufacturerId=&memProductId=&memTypeId=&offset=0 Why are there two golds here? EDIT- I see now. The silverware and points are not distributed correctly between 4x cores and 2x cores. Can we get this fixed? tia:) EDIT2- http://hwbot.org/searchResults.do?direction=&applicationId=7&cpu=Athlon+X2+5000&numberOfProcessors=1&gpu=&numberOfVideocards=0&manufacturer=&chipset=&model=&memManufacturer=&memType=&memProduct=&minCpuFreq=&maxCpuFreq=&minGpuCoreFreq=&maxGpuCoreFreq=&minGpuMemFreq=&maxGpuMemFreq=&minMemFreq=&maxMemFreq=&countryId=0&teamId=0&userName=&minScore=&maxScore=&displayAdvanced=false&filterBlocked=&filterUser=&filterVerification=&imageAttached=&dateFrom=&dateUntil=&system=&minTotalPoints=&gpuId=0&cpuId=2034&chipsetId=0&modelId=0&manufacturerId=0&memManufacturerId=&memProductId=&memTypeId=&offset=0 Same thing here. Better check the whole Athlon X2 5000 class. Edited July 13, 201014 yr by Mr.Scott
July 13, 201014 yr http://hwbot.org/searchResults.do?direction=&applicationId=6&cpu=Athlon+X2+5000&numberOfProcessors=1&gpu=&numberOfVideocards=0&manufacturer=&chipset=&model=&memManufacturer=&memType=&memProduct=&minCpuFreq=&maxCpuFreq=&minGpuCoreFreq=&maxGpuCoreFreq=&minGpuMemFreq=&maxGpuMemFreq=&minMemFreq=&maxMemFreq=&countryId=0&teamId=0&userName=&minScore=&maxScore=&displayAdvanced=false&filterBlocked=&filterUser=&filterVerification=&imageAttached=&dateFrom=&dateUntil=&system=&minTotalPoints=&gpuId=0&cpuId=2034&chipsetId=0&modelId=0&manufacturerId=0&memManufacturerId=&memProductId=&memTypeId=&offset=0 http://hwbot.org/searchResults.do?direction=&applicationId=3&cpu=Athlon+X2+5000&numberOfProcessors=1&gpu=&numberOfVideocards=0&manufacturer=&chipset=&model=&memManufacturer=&memType=&memProduct=&minCpuFreq=&maxCpuFreq=&minGpuCoreFreq=&maxGpuCoreFreq=&minGpuMemFreq=&maxGpuMemFreq=&minMemFreq=&maxMemFreq=&countryId=0&teamId=0&userName=&minScore=&maxScore=&displayAdvanced=false&filterBlocked=&filterUser=&filterVerification=&imageAttached=&dateFrom=&dateUntil=&system=&minTotalPoints=&gpuId=0&cpuId=2034&chipsetId=0&modelId=0&manufacturerId=0&memManufacturerId=&memProductId=&memTypeId=&offset=0 http://hwbot.org/searchResults.do?direction=&applicationId=9&cpu=Athlon+X2+5000&numberOfProcessors=1&gpu=&numberOfVideocards=0&manufacturer=&chipset=&model=&memManufacturer=&memType=&memProduct=&minCpuFreq=&maxCpuFreq=&minGpuCoreFreq=&maxGpuCoreFreq=&minGpuMemFreq=&maxGpuMemFreq=&minMemFreq=&maxMemFreq=&countryId=0&teamId=0&userName=&minScore=&maxScore=&displayAdvanced=false&filterBlocked=&filterUser=&filterVerification=&imageAttached=&dateFrom=&dateUntil=&system=&minTotalPoints=&gpuId=0&cpuId=2034&chipsetId=0&modelId=0&manufacturerId=0&memManufacturerId=&memProductId=&memTypeId=&offset=0 Are these going to be divided by number of cores also?, So points and silverware will be distributed fairly.
July 26, 201014 yr http://hwbot.org/searchResults.do?direction=&applicationId=9&cpu=Athlon+X2+5000&numberOfProcessors=0&gpu=&numberOfVideocards=0&manufacturer=&chipset=&model=&memManufacturer=&memType=&memProduct=&minCpuFreq=&maxCpuFreq=&minGpuCoreFreq=&maxGpuCoreFreq=&minGpuMemFreq=&maxGpuMemFreq=&minMemFreq=&maxMemFreq=&countryId=0&teamId=0&userName=&minScore=&maxScore=&displayAdvanced=false&filterBlocked=&filterUser=&filterVerification=&imageAttached=&dateFrom=&dateUntil=&system=&minTotalPoints=&gpuId=0&cpuId=2034&chipsetId=0&modelId=0&manufacturerId=0&memManufacturerId=&memProductId=&memTypeId=&offset=0 This is a little skewed too. Can we fix this? tia
July 26, 201014 yr http://hwbot.org/rankings/benchmark/wprime_32m/world_records 1.920 is faster than 1.907 ?
August 6, 201014 yr http://hwbot.org/community/submission/1020436_marcolecorse_3dmark_vantage___performance_radeon_hd_5970_35682_marks score ist out of line 1000/1200 OC and 115 111 FPS hier http://hwbot.org/community/submission/976591_nanok_3dmark_vantage___performance_radeon_hd_5970_32501_marks this score is okay 1000/1200 101.5 fps 92 fps 33500 GPU Scores VS 38700 GPU scores?with same gpu clock and less cpu ???? hellooooooo out thereeeee
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.