-> Validated score still wrong? Let us know here

[westsider]

and whats if i am an atheist?

and i dont give a damn about gods

 

wher are my human rights ?

[knopflerbruce]

My God is Dirk Meyer:D

[Topalof]

hi,

 

I did not know where post my message, so i apologize if this is the wrong section.

 

I had a bad link for the validation FM of my 3dm05 score, which was blocked, and i just change it to put the good link.

I was advised to report to the moderation.

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=837549

 

http://service.futuremark.com/resultComparison.action?compareResultId=4815132&compareResultType=12

 

thank you

bye

[NeoForce]

Unblocked.

ORB link is valid

________

Shinto Advice

Edited May 13, 2011 by NeoForce

[Topalof]

thank you

 

bye

[Ghost Overclock Device]

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=632534

 

This result (wPrime) can be "wrong". This Katmai (single cpu), at 630 mhz, is too fast.

The next Katmai (sinlge cpu) is this, at 644 mhz: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=817090

 

Siouxx's PC:

Pentium 3 450 @ 630

128Mb Ram

 

- 4 min 3 sec -

 

Kolian's PC:

Pentium 3 450 @ 644

384Mb Ram

 

- 4 min 55 sec -

[Kolian]

Here are two 2mx400 results, that's impossible to get such scores on 290/215MHz. Just check other results in this category.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=819708

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=819707

[Ivan1981]

It came to my attention that now exist the new Radeon 2600 PRO ddr3 category.

I edited my all scores(I hope ) achieved with Radeon 2600PRO with ddr3 memory and now these scores are in right category(in the time of the submition category of 2600pro ddr3 didn't exist).

My 2 scores are validated and checked by moderator(not the best score with HW) and I can't change the category for them.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=735331

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688501

 

It can be problem because I will have results with the same card in two category, and yes I will have more HW points for that, but this is not right and not according to rules, and it will be nice if moderator can edit category(change to radeon HD 2600pro gddr3 category) of this 2 scores.

[junior-21-]

hello. i think this score is not valid http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=727604

 

lack of details on screen. i reported it but it wasnot blocked. why is that?

[71proste]

because it's not suspicious so what's the point to block the score??

higher clocks than others,I don't see any problem

u should report these scores because of missing resolution on the ss

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=842434

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=838106

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=842436

Edited April 18, 2009 by 71proste

[junior-21-]

its ok. i thought it was necessary for a score to be ok. you are right about the first 2 links. what is wrong with tha 3rd link which is mine score?

[knopflerbruce]

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=785877

 

It's like 35% too fast for the clocks:p No doubt it's not the correct version. No CPUZ either, just some other program.

[S_A_V]

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=785877

 

It's like 35% too fast for the clocks:p No doubt it's not the correct version. No CPUZ either, just some other program.

 

Wrong PiFast version used (memory allocated 61757kb instead of 61372kb)

[knopflerbruce]

Wrong PiFast version used (memory allocated 61757kb instead of 61372kb)

 

I've seen that before. I'm glad the other version is so easy to spot;)

 

More scores that need to be moved/deleted:

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=500005 - DFI never made a 940 mobo. And the clock is WAY above what these chips can do...

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=444773 - Says DFI nf4 Ultra-D, which is socket 939 - not 940...

[71proste]

its ok. i thought it was necessary for a score to be ok. you are right about the first 2 links. what is wrong with tha 3rd link which is mine score?

 

hehe,my mistake I am sorry mate u r right

wrong link pasted:rolleyes:,already edited

[Ghost Overclock Device]

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=560384

 

No verification link, no screenshot. Not good.

[hydrotoxin]

My PCMark 05 scores #1/#2 have been blocked because

 

insufficient verification for rankings (Please provide validation link Suspicious cause you test various systems but only in several cases you use such fast HDD subsystem)

I don't know why my score should be suspicious, just because I started benching with my two SSD's that came to me out of rma?? Edited April 20, 2009 by hydrotoxin

[NeoForce]

hydrotoxin

That`s OK. I just don`t know what HDDs you use

Please provide one valid ORB link, so I can see all subtests is OK.

________

Ship Sale

Edited May 13, 2011 by NeoForce

[hydrotoxin]

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=844718 -> http://service.futuremark.com/results/showSingleResult.action?resultId=1940138&resultType=13 Edited April 20, 2009 by hydrotoxin

[NeoForce]

hydrotoxin

Ok!

Thank you. Your scores will be unblocked in few minutes.

Sorry for being too suspicious

________

Druze forums

Edited May 13, 2011 by NeoForce

[hydrotoxin]

Thank you for unblocking

[BenchBros]

can someone tell me what T-Rex have done to get this score legaly?

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=842010

 

for me, compared to all the other 03 Results in the Top Ranks, it looks like a bugged 03 run...

only 6G (secound place runs 6,4) and "only" 990 GPU (secound place runs 1070) this result makes no sense to me

[Don_Dan]

Read today's newspost!

 

And first place has just changed to hipro5 again!

[HITandRUN]

Somebody take a look on this entry: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=632079. The entered time says 37 sec. but the screenshot says 37.64 sec.

[alexander_corvinus]

pls corection this again http://www.hwbot.org/listResults.do?userId=20225&applicationId=17 why 0.7 point? many wrong for my result pls PM me where / why? thx a lot