-> Validated score still wrong? Let us know here

[Mr.Scott]

http://hwbot.org/community/submission/1000210_ribeirocross_cpu_z_sempron_2200_athlon_xp_2426_mhz

Think we can get this put in the right category? It's obviously not a Sempron. tia

This entry now says checked by moderator.

Show me another Sempron 2200+ with a multiplier that isn't 9x on a NF2 motherboard. It's not possible. This entry is an AXP 2200+, in the wrong category.

[Thor941]

This entry now says checked by moderator.

Show me another Sempron 2200+ with a multiplier that isn't 9x on a NF2 motherboard. It's not possible. This entry is an AXP 2200+, in the wrong category.

 

as I have explained to an other user by PM, I have bugged! I heve moderated something like 100 results tonight so shits happen ... I have edited the result

 

my bad

[Mr.Scott]

as I have explained to an other user by PM, I have bugged! I heve moderated something like 100 results tonight so shits happen ... I have edited the result

 

my bad

It's all good brother, I wasn't criticizing you. Just double checking. You do a fine job here and I understand mistakes happen.

[Antinomy]

This entry now says checked by moderator.

Show me another Sempron 2200+ with a multiplier that isn't 9x on a NF2 motherboard. It's not possible. This entry is an AXP 2200+, in the wrong category.

And this is not the only innuendo

[Mr.Scott]

It's all good brother, I wasn't criticizing you. Just double checking. You do a fine job here and I understand mistakes happen.

Now if we could fix the points and silverware, that would be outstanding.

http://hwbot.org/searchResults.do?direction=&applicationId=13&cpu=Sempron+2200%2B+%28Athlon+XP%29&numberOfProcessors=1&gpu=&numberOfVideocards=0&manufacturer=&chipset=&model=&memManufacturer=&memType=&memProduct=&minCpuFreq=&maxCpuFreq=&minGpuCoreFreq=&maxGpuCoreFreq=&minGpuMemFreq=&maxGpuMemFreq=&minMemFreq=&maxMemFreq=&countryId=0&teamId=0&userName=&minScore=&maxScore=&displayAdvanced=false&filterBlocked=&filterUser=&filterVerification=&imageAttached=&dateFrom=&dateUntil=&system=&minTotalPoints=&gpuId=0&cpuId=541&chipsetId=0&modelId=0&manufacturerId=0&memManufacturerId=&memProductId=&memTypeId=&offset=0

[Bobnova]

My recently single E4500 scores are coming up as 4x core scores, i checked and 1x is selected, i reported 'em and someone checked them but didn't make them into dual cores.

 

These:

 

http://hwbot.org/community/submission/1005670_bobnova_wprime_1024m_core_2_e4500_2.2ghz_9min_37sec_827ms

http://hwbot.org/community/submission/1005671_bobnova_wprime_32m_core_2_e4500_2.2ghz_17sec_693ms

[Gyrock]

Dear moderators

 

I found today that my best 1xGPU 3Dmark 2006 score earns no point on both 1xGPU global and HD5870 HW point.

 

http://hwbot.org/community/submission/998124_gyrock_3dmark_2006_radeon_hd_5870_34166_marks

 

saying that "not Gyrock’s best 3Dmark 2006 submission, only best is ranked".

But this is my best result of 3DM06 with 1xGPU.

 

http://hwbot.org/listResults.do?userId=27000&applicationId=12

 

could you please check it and, if something wrong, fix it?

 

Thank you

[Thor941]

fixed

[Gyrock]

Thor941-san, what a quick fix!

Thanks a lot!

[Thor941]

just needed one click

[Mr.Scott]

http://hwbot.org/forum/showthread.php?t=8070

In the above link the submission clearly states that it is a dual processor submission, yet it's in and scored as a single processor. Can we fix this and restore the proper points and silverware to the single processor class? tia

EDIT - noticed points were removed, but still need to fix points and silverware. tia again.

Edited June 10, 2010 by Mr.Scott

[Mr.Scott]

http://hwbot.org/community/submission/563701_aspstein_wprime_1024m_athlon_mp_1900_27min_9sec_330ms?tab=info

Same problem as above post, here too.

[Thor941]

should be fixed

[Mr.Scott]

should be fixed

Yeah......not so much.

http://hwbot.org/searchResults.do?direction=&applicationId=15&cpu=Athlon+MP+1900%2B&numberOfProcessors=0&gpu=&numberOfVideocards=0&manufacturer=&chipset=&model=&memManufacturer=&memType=&memProduct=&minCpuFreq=&maxCpuFreq=&minGpuCoreFreq=&maxGpuCoreFreq=&minGpuMemFreq=&maxGpuMemFreq=&minMemFreq=&maxMemFreq=&countryId=0&teamId=0&userName=&minScore=&maxScore=&displayAdvanced=false&filterBlocked=&filterUser=&filterVerification=&imageAttached=&dateFrom=&dateUntil=&system=&minTotalPoints=&gpuId=0&cpuId=1126&chipsetId=0&modelId=0&manufacturerId=0&memManufacturerId=&memProductId=&memTypeId=&offset=0

http://hwbot.org/searchResults.do?direction=&applicationId=14&cpu=Athlon+MP+1900%2B&numberOfProcessors=0&gpu=&numberOfVideocards=0&manufacturer=&chipset=&model=&memManufacturer=&memType=&memProduct=&minCpuFreq=&maxCpuFreq=&minGpuCoreFreq=&maxGpuCoreFreq=&minGpuMemFreq=&maxGpuMemFreq=&minMemFreq=&maxMemFreq=&countryId=0&teamId=0&userName=&minScore=&maxScore=&displayAdvanced=false&filterBlocked=&filterUser=&filterVerification=&imageAttached=&dateFrom=&dateUntil=&system=&minTotalPoints=&gpuId=0&cpuId=1126&chipsetId=0&modelId=0&manufacturerId=0&memManufacturerId=&memProductId=&memTypeId=&offset=0

In both of these, the first 2 entries are the same rig. Instead of 2 points and a gold for each, it should be 2 points and a gold for the first one (2x CPU's) and no points for the second entry( still 2x CPU's). Then, all the single CPU entries need the proper points and silverware. Get my drift?

[Thor941]

I am just taking it case by case bro

 

What about now?

[Mr.Scott]

I am just taking it case by case bro

 

What about now?

Yeah baby, now you're on it. Thanks again brother.

[Chiller]

Demiurg blocked two score incorrect, and while Thor checked them already

 

one of me :

http://hwbot.org/community/submission/949613_chiller_3dmark_vantage___performance_geforce_gts_250_9095_marks

 

and from other member:

http://hwbot.org/community/submission/979213_awalleyeguy_3dmark_vantage___performance_geforce_gts_250_9568_marks

 

This is not the way to block CORRECT scores while the cpu scores are correct, and normal for that cpu 980X.

 

As mod you need to know that what the normal cpu score is with 980X.

[Johnksss]

+1

[Chiller]

normal cpu socre and they block it?

 

they look at GpuZ and there is PhysX on.

Why ?

GpuZ gives that the option PhysX is on in the driver.

But when you disable PPU in vanatge this option still stays on in GpuZ.

 

second : the cpu scores are normaal at given cpu speed, otherwise it was +70K cpu score or so, and not 40K with a 980X OCed, just like all my scores of vanatge.

 

i always disable PPU in vantage and not driver.

 

They should know this as a moderator.

 

PS : i whant to send my solicitation sheet for getting a score moderator here on hwbot.

To who i need to send that?

[Mr.Scott]

http://hwbot.org/searchResults.do?direction=&applicationId=15&cpu=Athlon+X2+5000&numberOfProcessors=1&gpu=&numberOfVideocards=0&manufacturer=&chipset=&model=&memManufacturer=&memType=&memProduct=&minCpuFreq=&maxCpuFreq=&minGpuCoreFreq=&maxGpuCoreFreq=&minGpuMemFreq=&maxGpuMemFreq=&minMemFreq=&maxMemFreq=&countryId=0&teamId=0&userName=&minScore=&maxScore=&displayAdvanced=false&filterBlocked=&filterUser=&filterVerification=&imageAttached=&dateFrom=&dateUntil=&system=&minTotalPoints=&gpuId=0&cpuId=2034&chipsetId=0&modelId=0&manufacturerId=0&memManufacturerId=&memProductId=&memTypeId=&offset=0

Why are there two golds here?

EDIT- I see now. The silverware and points are not distributed correctly between 4x cores and 2x cores. Can we get this fixed? tia:)

EDIT2- http://hwbot.org/searchResults.do?direction=&applicationId=7&cpu=Athlon+X2+5000&numberOfProcessors=1&gpu=&numberOfVideocards=0&manufacturer=&chipset=&model=&memManufacturer=&memType=&memProduct=&minCpuFreq=&maxCpuFreq=&minGpuCoreFreq=&maxGpuCoreFreq=&minGpuMemFreq=&maxGpuMemFreq=&minMemFreq=&maxMemFreq=&countryId=0&teamId=0&userName=&minScore=&maxScore=&displayAdvanced=false&filterBlocked=&filterUser=&filterVerification=&imageAttached=&dateFrom=&dateUntil=&system=&minTotalPoints=&gpuId=0&cpuId=2034&chipsetId=0&modelId=0&manufacturerId=0&memManufacturerId=&memProductId=&memTypeId=&offset=0

Same thing here.

Better check the whole Athlon X2 5000 class.

Edited July 13, 2010 by Mr.Scott

[Mr.Scott]

http://hwbot.org/searchResults.do?direction=&applicationId=6&cpu=Athlon+X2+5000&numberOfProcessors=1&gpu=&numberOfVideocards=0&manufacturer=&chipset=&model=&memManufacturer=&memType=&memProduct=&minCpuFreq=&maxCpuFreq=&minGpuCoreFreq=&maxGpuCoreFreq=&minGpuMemFreq=&maxGpuMemFreq=&minMemFreq=&maxMemFreq=&countryId=0&teamId=0&userName=&minScore=&maxScore=&displayAdvanced=false&filterBlocked=&filterUser=&filterVerification=&imageAttached=&dateFrom=&dateUntil=&system=&minTotalPoints=&gpuId=0&cpuId=2034&chipsetId=0&modelId=0&manufacturerId=0&memManufacturerId=&memProductId=&memTypeId=&offset=0

http://hwbot.org/searchResults.do?direction=&applicationId=3&cpu=Athlon+X2+5000&numberOfProcessors=1&gpu=&numberOfVideocards=0&manufacturer=&chipset=&model=&memManufacturer=&memType=&memProduct=&minCpuFreq=&maxCpuFreq=&minGpuCoreFreq=&maxGpuCoreFreq=&minGpuMemFreq=&maxGpuMemFreq=&minMemFreq=&maxMemFreq=&countryId=0&teamId=0&userName=&minScore=&maxScore=&displayAdvanced=false&filterBlocked=&filterUser=&filterVerification=&imageAttached=&dateFrom=&dateUntil=&system=&minTotalPoints=&gpuId=0&cpuId=2034&chipsetId=0&modelId=0&manufacturerId=0&memManufacturerId=&memProductId=&memTypeId=&offset=0

http://hwbot.org/searchResults.do?direction=&applicationId=9&cpu=Athlon+X2+5000&numberOfProcessors=1&gpu=&numberOfVideocards=0&manufacturer=&chipset=&model=&memManufacturer=&memType=&memProduct=&minCpuFreq=&maxCpuFreq=&minGpuCoreFreq=&maxGpuCoreFreq=&minGpuMemFreq=&maxGpuMemFreq=&minMemFreq=&maxMemFreq=&countryId=0&teamId=0&userName=&minScore=&maxScore=&displayAdvanced=false&filterBlocked=&filterUser=&filterVerification=&imageAttached=&dateFrom=&dateUntil=&system=&minTotalPoints=&gpuId=0&cpuId=2034&chipsetId=0&modelId=0&manufacturerId=0&memManufacturerId=&memProductId=&memTypeId=&offset=0

Are these going to be divided by number of cores also?, So points and silverware will be distributed fairly.

[Mr.Scott]

http://hwbot.org/searchResults.do?direction=&applicationId=9&cpu=Athlon+X2+5000&numberOfProcessors=0&gpu=&numberOfVideocards=0&manufacturer=&chipset=&model=&memManufacturer=&memType=&memProduct=&minCpuFreq=&maxCpuFreq=&minGpuCoreFreq=&maxGpuCoreFreq=&minGpuMemFreq=&maxGpuMemFreq=&minMemFreq=&maxMemFreq=&countryId=0&teamId=0&userName=&minScore=&maxScore=&displayAdvanced=false&filterBlocked=&filterUser=&filterVerification=&imageAttached=&dateFrom=&dateUntil=&system=&minTotalPoints=&gpuId=0&cpuId=2034&chipsetId=0&modelId=0&manufacturerId=0&memManufacturerId=&memProductId=&memTypeId=&offset=0

This is a little skewed too.

Can we fix this? tia

[Thor941]

fixed

[TaPaKaH]

http://hwbot.org/rankings/benchmark/wprime_32m/world_records

 

1.920 is faster than 1.907 ?

[westsider]

http://hwbot.org/community/submission/1020436_marcolecorse_3dmark_vantage___performance_radeon_hd_5970_35682_marks

 

score ist out of line

1000/1200 OC

and 115 111 FPS

 

 

hier

http://hwbot.org/community/submission/976591_nanok_3dmark_vantage___performance_radeon_hd_5970_32501_marks

this score is okay

1000/1200

101.5 fps

92 fps

 

 

33500 GPU Scores VS 38700 GPU scores?with same gpu clock and less cpu ????

hellooooooo out thereeeee