Can't we blame the previous owner(s) for knowingly handing it over to someone who didn't have the time/experience etc to handle the workload at the moment?
Yeah it's a shame but I can understand the reasoning, people are already bad enough for meeting the rules, so moving away from the easy i3/5/7 would just add to the nightmare for moderators
Could either do it as an OR system, so either down to 75% or x% of submissions whichever comes first, or could need both to be TRUE, just an idea
Fair enough, interesting.
What about the idea both Strunkenbold and I suggested (along with possibly others), with having both a % cutoff and a min. number of point earning submissions cutoff (which may be based on a % of total submissions for that benchmark).
Which would help avoid gpugpi 1b issues with the titan v being so far ahead?
Also I'm not sure what this means, so will people who previously would have got 0 would now get 0.2 just for subbing any score?
My thinking exactly, if I max out everything instantly what's the point of having another go
Looking forward to trying some legacy 3d, and hopefully aiming to take a card cold if I can.
There's no need to delid s775 cpus
Err I'm not entirely sure, gpu boost 3.0 seems a bit like witch craft to me haha. For 03 you needed to use LOD, same with Heaven