Calathea Posted October 2, 2013 Posted October 2, 2013 This guy surfaced for 1 or 2 years ago on local swedish forum and claimed he had a 5900 MHz 2600k, right when people where stuck with the first x53 multi cpus. Sure, not impossible, but as we know very, very hard to come by. No benchmarks or anything else at all other than cpu-z validation. Cpu was already sold when I asked to buy it from him. He also posted a result here on hwbot with E8400 @ 6174 MHz... AIR-cooled. Yeah right. http://hwbot.org/submission/2291016_xroo_cpu_frequency_core_2_e8400_(3.0ghz)_6174_mhz Today I saw him posting an old result with his E8400, 6,7 GHz @ 743 fsb. http://valid.canardpc.com/2381309 Well, this last result really pushes the "plausible" to pure bunnyextraction. I don't know the guy and have not asked him about this, but I'm very curious how he cheated CPU-Z. I thought cpu-z was safe with s775? But 743 MHz fsb is quite a lot more than I'm willing to believe... What do you guys make of this? Quote
K404 Posted October 2, 2013 Posted October 2, 2013 I've had doubts about CPU-Z safety for a while. Quote
TaPaKaH Posted October 2, 2013 Posted October 2, 2013 looks like a fake, time difference between his 'air' and 'LN2' runs is 10mins, plus the FSB numbers look a bit too even Quote
d3mox Posted October 2, 2013 Posted October 2, 2013 xroo commented on his own score: 479 days ago – 5 cans of freeze spray and voila! ~2 minutes of runtime until it died. With freeze spray he had max -65 F / ~-53*C. But yeah i think too that the numbers are too even. Quote
The Mutt Posted October 3, 2013 Posted October 3, 2013 I asked him on a swedish forum what cooling he used for the 6.7 result and he claims that he used freeze spray for that too. The funny thing is that I bought the CPU, RAM and motherboard from a guy that bought it from him and with cascade cooling(-90c) and I was nowhere near that result. Those RAMs is good for 595mhz. That guy is clearly cheating... Quote
The Mutt Posted October 3, 2013 Posted October 3, 2013 This is old but any way... http://www.overclock.net/t/228877/guide-editing-cpuz-passing-validation Quote
Calathea Posted October 3, 2013 Author Posted October 3, 2013 Damn, at least the examples in that thread have red cross on them now. Cheaters suck. Quote
knopflerbruce Posted October 3, 2013 Posted October 3, 2013 1.7v, too STINKS fake. Let him prove it's not Quote
Crew Vivi Posted October 4, 2013 Crew Posted October 4, 2013 freez spray is really hard to get the pot to go cold, you need like a whole can Quote
d3mox Posted October 4, 2013 Posted October 4, 2013 Freeze spray is good to freeze cpu box cooler. It works good Quote
chispy Posted January 5, 2014 Posted January 5, 2014 743 number looks a tiny bit off to the left if you use zoom in see closely the number do not match perfectly align with the other ones , that's a pointer for me it might be phothoChoped .............LOL as fake as Pamela Anderson Boobs ! Quote
TASOS Posted January 5, 2014 Posted January 5, 2014 Another odd thing is , that he always have perfectly rounded numbers on fsb. ? Quote
rsnubje Posted January 6, 2014 Posted January 6, 2014 Why are the discussed scores even still on and valid... Quote
knopflerbruce Posted January 6, 2014 Posted January 6, 2014 Huh? I can't find one that's at 743 FSB. Quote
Administrators websmile Posted January 6, 2014 Administrators Posted January 6, 2014 http://hwbot.org/submission/2291016_xroo_cpu_frequency_core_2_e8400_%283.0ghz%29_6174_mhz How about these 6174 mHZ on air? It is even linked in the startpost... - the 743 are there as well, but I do not know if these were subbed to hwbot Quote
der8auer Posted January 6, 2014 Posted January 6, 2014 I blocked the submission. There's nothing we can do about the scores on the CPU-Z page. Quote
Nassuz Posted September 29, 2014 Posted September 29, 2014 What i hate moore than cheaters.......cheaters that WONT give up, pro cause they are too stupid to stop. Ban him,put him on a blacklist. Submitting fake scores on a international forum/database is someting different, what a jerk. Quote
Bones Posted October 1, 2014 Posted October 1, 2014 (edited) If you'll look at his FSB and HT speeds, you should see something like "743.14" or similar to that. CPU-Z shows the FSB and HT speeds with 2 decimal points but his "Validation" shot doesn't have it at all. The numbers do align as they should but the lack of decimal points is extremely suspect, even if it were dead on 743 it should still show "743.00" for his FSB speed and the same basic thing for his HT speed. I do know the program itself shows this and validations I believe show it too. Edited October 1, 2014 by Bones Quote
ObscureParadox Posted October 1, 2014 Posted October 1, 2014 I've just noticed too that his 9800GTX is a DX11 version of the card too, amazing Quote
K404 Posted October 1, 2014 Posted October 1, 2014 If you OC a GPU far enough, it's instruction set and capabilities change. It's much much more than just an FPS increase Quote
ObscureParadox Posted October 1, 2014 Posted October 1, 2014 Kenny finally reveals his extra 15% Quote
Crew Antinomy Posted October 3, 2014 Crew Posted October 3, 2014 Bones, not exactly. For the new version it cut's decimals if it's 00. http://valid.canardpc.com/h7asb1 - not fake maybe it did show .00 with older versions, can't remember. Though the alignment should be to the center. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.