Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

-> Validated score still wrong? Let us know here


Recommended Posts

  • 1 month later...

hi all and happy new year.

is the staff can do something for this two submitions:

 

http://hwbot.org/community/submission/2097725_evosia_3dmark11___performance_2x_radeon_hd_5870_9947_marks

http://hwbot.org/community/submission/2099153_evosia_3dmark11___extreme_2x_radeon_hd_5870_3554_marks

 

like you can see, it says it's not my best score. but it is for the 2x hd 5870 and for the "EX preset". don't know why it say that. can you do something for a right calculation, if you please.

 

thanks in advance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Crew
hi all and happy new year.

is the staff can do something for this two submitions:

 

http://hwbot.org/community/submission/2097725_evosia_3dmark11___performance_2x_radeon_hd_5870_9947_marks

http://hwbot.org/community/submission/2099153_evosia_3dmark11___extreme_2x_radeon_hd_5870_3554_marks

 

like you can see, it says it's not my best score. but it is for the 2x hd 5870 and for the "EX preset". don't know why it say that. can you do something for a right calculation, if you please.

 

thanks in advance.

 

"force recalculation", in More.

Wait until tomorrow, if not return the points, please, communicate in a separate post, in this subforum. ;)

 

Regards

 

Sw

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...
Hi!

Can you delete this? http://hwbot.org/community/submission/2120880_joonaseh_wprime_32m_4x_core_i5_2500k_8sec_296ms

It's actualy a 1x 2500k score, not 4x 2500k score.

 

You can edit/delete by yourself here :

http://hwbot.org/community/submission/2120880_joonaseh_wprime_32m_4x_core_i5_2500k_8sec_296ms?tab=more

Edited by Christian Ney
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I often check new 06 submissions with good scores to learn something from them;)

A good result is almost always good teacher, so if I find a good one I usually check it in detail.

Yesterday, I found a very good 06 result with relatively low cpu/gpu clocks;

http://hwbot.org/community/submission/2120636_cix1978_3dmark06_geforce_gtx_580_43047_marks?tab=info

I got interested how to achieve this and checked it in detail.

FPSs in GT1/2 part are high and I assumed the cpu clock was much higher than 6.15GHz.

CPU Test score is also high and the clock must have been around 6.15GHz.

FPSs in GT3/4 part isn't that high, maybe due to low gpu clock

but the HDR/SM3.0 score seems higher. So I calculated the socore from FPSs with the formula from 06 White Paper;

HDR/SM3.0 Score = 50x(Canyon Flight FPS + Deep Freeze FPS)

 

50x(220.30+168.319)=19417

 

and this is lower than the score in screenshot : 19659.

This formula usually works fine for the calculation but this time ???

There is no ORB link in the result so I cannot check anymore.

Is this 06 bug or something?

Could you check this please?

 

Thanks:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did I post this in the wrong thread???

If so, please let me know the right place??;)

 

I often check new 06 submissions with good scores to learn something from them;)

A good result is almost always good teacher, so if I find a good one I usually check it in detail.

Yesterday, I found a very good 06 result with relatively low cpu/gpu clocks;

http://hwbot.org/community/submission/2120636_cix1978_3dmark06_geforce_gtx_580_43047_marks?tab=info

I got interested how to achieve this and checked it in detail.

FPSs in GT1/2 part are high and I assumed the cpu clock was much higher than 6.15GHz.

CPU Test score is also high and the clock must have been around 6.15GHz.

FPSs in GT3/4 part isn't that high, maybe due to low gpu clock

but the HDR/SM3.0 score seems higher. So I calculated the socore from FPSs with the formula from 06 White Paper;

HDR/SM3.0 Score = 50x(Canyon Flight FPS + Deep Freeze FPS)

 

50x(220.30+168.319)=19417

 

and this is lower than the score in screenshot : 19659.

This formula usually works fine for the calculation but this time ???

There is no ORB link in the result so I cannot check anymore.

Is this 06 bug or something?

Could you check this please?

 

Thanks:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

http://www.hwbot.org/community/submission/2126516_nwd_wprime_32m_athlon_mp_1800_1min_3sec_844ms

Sorry Alex, but your solution here doesn't agree with the rules.

3.4. Unlocked CPUs and Modded Video Cards

Again this is a subject where we have to trust on the honesty of the submitter; if you have a CPU with unlocked multiplier, please only submit results under the hardware category of its original model. Don’t emulate other models to gain HWboints, if you are caught you will get penalized or even banned. The same goes for video cards which are modified either with a flashed BIOS or modded software, post your scores in the category of the original hardware.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did I post this in the wrong thread???

If so, please let me know the right place??;)

 

Hello gyrock-san! I am not a result mod, but I looked at the result screenshot.... it is not clear.

 

My eyes are not so good, but I think Canyon Flight FPS are 228.850

 

If that is put into the formula, 50(228.850 + 168.319) = 19858.45

 

I think the SM3 score is 19859

 

The problem is the detail in the screenshot, a better resolution would be nice

 

 

 

If the scores are high for the MHz, I do not know :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...