der8auer Posted December 11, 2013 Posted December 11, 2013 ^Feeling the same on Asrock Leeg, but I have a feeling it is A88X vs. A85X implementation is better with some vendors rather than others. Gigabyte and Asus seem to be pretty close efficiency wise, but I am thinking about grabbing a UP4 as everyone has very efficient scores. I have only tested with PSC so I am throwing the Samsung in to see if maybe that helps. Vdimm seemed to make things worse, 1.73v was optimum for 2600 9-12-9-28 2T. Ohh apu, why so fail? Interesting thing about the vDimm. The UP4 is okay but I already killed one of them and the memory OC is a pain in the ass. On both boards I could not manage to get 2600 stable. ~2500 is maximum here. Tested with BBSE, PSC, Samsung and of course different CPUs but no change so I'm quite sure it's board related. I just have no clue at all what is limiting. Quote
l0ud_sil3nc3 Posted December 11, 2013 Posted December 11, 2013 I got 4K on water with cpu at 4.95 and gpu/mem at 1260/1300. What cpu? 6800/5800 or 6400/5400? Quote
Splave Posted December 11, 2013 Posted December 11, 2013 Interesting thing about the vDimm. The UP4 is okay but I already killed one of them and the memory OC is a pain in the ass. On both boards I could not manage to get 2600 stable. ~2500 is maximum here. Tested with BBSE, PSC, Samsung and of course different CPUs but no change so I'm quite sure it's board related. I just have no clue at all what is limiting. this is where im at with a88x extreme 6. seeing everyone run 1300 memory im blown away why all 3 of my chips will not do it Glad Im in good company. Quote
Crew Leeghoofd Posted December 11, 2013 Crew Posted December 11, 2013 I get 2560 on most MSI and GB boards Roman, this with PSC or Samsungs. Though the MSI is so slow compared to the GB (loosing 200-250 points clock per clock)... Adjusting subtimings now, but board get's very erratic in boot behaviour... sigh and no POST LED... Quote
I.nfraR.ed Posted December 11, 2013 Posted December 11, 2013 What cpu? 6800/5800 or 6400/5400? 6800K. No way to do the same with the smaller models. Not reachable even on LN2 I guess? Quote
bartx Posted December 11, 2013 Posted December 11, 2013 I've got the question about hybrid graphics. I'm currently benching on HD6670 DDR5 and HD6550D and it seems to behave like HD6670 alone... I know, that for older benchmarks and games only discrete gpu is used, but I saw this score http://hwbot.org/submission/2459458_chispy_3dmark03_radeon_hd_6690d2_58651_marks from chispy and he's getting 50% better result than mine - is there some kind of special trick to do this? I assume, that he got both cards working in crossfire mode, when running 2003. Quote
Doc.Brown Posted December 11, 2013 Posted December 11, 2013 Can't submit my score with old FX-60 on Aqua FX stage,always go to "ooops something goes wrong". Someone has got the same issue ? Quote
GENiEBEN Posted December 11, 2013 Posted December 11, 2013 Can't submit my score with old FX-60 on Aqua FX stage,always go to "ooops something goes wrong".Someone has got the same issue ? Send me the scorefile thru PM. Quote
Doc.Brown Posted December 11, 2013 Posted December 11, 2013 Solved with putting the real CPU frequencie I think Quote
GENiEBEN Posted December 11, 2013 Posted December 11, 2013 Solved with putting the real CPU frequencie I think Yes. Quote
zeneffect Posted December 11, 2013 Posted December 11, 2013 (edited) how often do the stage scores get updated? im looking @ us average for 32m and its not being reflected. should be in the 8:25 area Edited December 11, 2013 by zeneffect Quote
zeneffect Posted December 11, 2013 Posted December 11, 2013 maybe im doing math wrong? im coming up with 8m25.508 Quote
Crew Leeghoofd Posted December 11, 2013 Crew Posted December 11, 2013 Now I'm starting to understand why you are always a few seconds faster then the rest Zen You are time warping ! Quote
zeneffect Posted December 11, 2013 Posted December 11, 2013 Now I'm starting to understand why you are always a few seconds faster then the rest Zen You are time warping ! I guess... I keep running the numbers and keep coming up with 8:25.508 Quote
zeneffect Posted December 11, 2013 Posted December 11, 2013 (edited) yes, I think my math is off... doing this at work is no good for my brain worms.... *edit* ran it through excel.... my dumbness is being retahded 8:31 is right.... was basing off of 100 rather than 60 that 10 min score needs to go away... Edited December 11, 2013 by zeneffect Quote
Crew Leeghoofd Posted December 11, 2013 Crew Posted December 11, 2013 Belgium wants to swap the 10 minute score for a 14 min one, is that okay ? Quote
zeneffect Posted December 11, 2013 Posted December 11, 2013 (edited) Belgium wants to swap the 10 minute score for a 14 min one, is that okay ? include all the waffles, a dozen women (between the ages of 18 and 30, not exceeding 120lbs and for the love of god NO SIDEBURNS OR BEARDS), and its a deal. if a couple are deaf, that's cool too... unintelligible animal noises are the hotness. Edited December 11, 2013 by zeneffect Quote
Wizerty Posted December 12, 2013 Posted December 12, 2013 Haaaa, this issss soooooo truuuueeeeee 2day ago : 3hour to find a way to increase voltage on 6970DCII -> Fail yesterday : 3hour to find a way to install xp on desktop // CD -> Fail // Flash drive fail // 2nd flash drive fail... and 3hour later, find a solution, my news SSD (sandisc ultra plus) don't works with XP... installation failed, with crucial M4 it works. spend 3hour for this crap. Too many hardware... CC is really time consuming, to find "the good" hardware, buy it, install os, try to understand how it works, prepare for cold.... finally 10% bench, 90% to set up the rig. Quote
sno Posted December 12, 2013 Posted December 12, 2013 (edited) Trying to get this submitted, but it doesn't look like it's showing up under the competition page. http://hwbot.org/submission/2464844_sno_superpi___32m_core_i7_4900mq_8min_56sec_354ms Should be on this page, yes? Edited December 12, 2013 by sno Quote
zeneffect Posted December 12, 2013 Posted December 12, 2013 Sno, your score is slower than FUGGER's so its not showing up. Look @ the CPUz and you will see you both are using the same socket. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.