Submission & member moderation

If so, How come we privately discuss some long standing results on this board that are apparently fabricated and not Genuine? And the consensus is that they are so old that no one would take the time to moderate them and remove them?

I dont know whether its right for me to discuss it like this but can a Mod check this result of mine, no special tweaks used apart from ATT to lower graphic quality etc but no LOD tweaks as well.....So really nothing much to it, no bugs as well that I can really say happened during the run....Picture is in high quality as well, if needed will upload the original jpeg again......But please mod it soon, if needed will run the bench again but have sold the cards and they will be shipped on Saturday.

My team lost around 100 hardware points today, on older hardware that not many are benching. I personally had 69 different entries lose points. I find this very hard to believe.

as the title suggests.... for example dual 285....my score against someone's score...side by side pics...side by side gpu core speed...memory...etc

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=915641 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=915576 I don't understand why this submission has been blocked. I know there is no gpu-z in the screenshot but cpu-z also shows the card make and model and I have seen this used by others who have submitted scores. considering the only other person to submit a score for this card didn't even post a screenshot , I don't see what's wrong with my submission.

Hi. I have submitted some results with this cpu. Can you added it? Thank you. AMD Sempron X 2 2200 SDO2200IAA4DO Step: CAA9G

Please i want to know if can i help Fabi to try to get better results. We are doing a last overclocking seccion before ends 3 stage of the cup. We are trying together (she haves her system and her processor and i am trying with my system). I think i can help Fabi to get a little better result. I hope somebody reply before the end of the competition Sorry the broken english

Please I would like to ask you a question. Me and my husband (rbuass) have a lot of hardware, and i got better results than the previously posted to the hwbot Country Cup I'm afraid to include the result because someone may think that we share the same hardware. The only thing we share is the nitrogen and the hard disk that are clean (windows 7). I got better results than those provided previously, but only posted the ones I have used different hardware (if the motherboard Asus M4A79T Deluxe) I wonder if there is some problem in posting the results with similar hardware to my husband. I do the isolation of my equipment and realize my own overclocking. Of course, i…

Hi guys, I've just built a machine for a customer and I'd like to do a quick set of benchies on air. I have unlocked it to a quad core (Phenom X3 720 BE), am I allowed to post results under the Phenom X3 720 Black Edition category?

THIS CARD IS NOT AN 8800GT. I made it LOOK like an 8800GT to the drivers so I can use it with 169.21 drivers and get a boost in 3D01.. possibly 3D03. Might also remove coldbug.... I can rank well without bending the way the card is seen by the drivers. I can get Gold if I do. Will respect HWB decision either way. I dont like doing stuff like this and sponsors might not like "ugly" solutions on the way to WR but better asking now

I cant seem to delete this, please .

I can't seem to upload my SPI 1M score to the database. Whenever I try it says.. I've checked and i have no result recorded for it. I even went as far as deleting my previous results for SPI1M for this chip so that there is nothing there, but i still get this message. I checked the duplicate search tab and nothing comes up. I'm confused.

I just lost 10 hwboints within a few hours, but my rank is still intact. Also it was my highest hwboints ever achieved and the maximum points that I reached, 357.6 is not visible in my profile anymore. After checking overclockers league ranking, it seems every1 around me has dropped points suddenly and hence my rank(which I got to after reaching 357.6 points) hasnt changed. Something seems fishy to me,

http://hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/geforce_7600_go_64bit?tab=hall%20of%20fame PMed a mod about this lastnight, but a buddy told me to post it in the forums not bother him. This was reported (for the wrong reason) and subsequently approved. Would think it is patently obvious when running slower clocks than #2 and scoreing 50% higher.. but whatever. There is only one laptop with a 256MB 64bit card http://www.notebookcheck.net/NVIDIA-GeForce-Go-7600.2144.0.html Caution: Some of the 128 MB equipped models offer only a 64 bit memory interface, which leads to drastic losses of performance. According to some messages the 256 MB version in Samsung R55 result…

I honestly think the three following scores should never have been approved: http://hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=906442 http://hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=906443 http://hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=906445 I think its completely lame to see no#1 in hall of fame listing, correct, it doesnt give points, but it gives #1 in global ranking..... FOR results on hardware that wont be public availible in year 2009.... Why the heck isnt the other decent and HONEST results #1 While Im at it; I think the 3Dmark2006 result isnt anywhere near good, and the performance product of the 32M sucks compared to Stummerwinter who has the VALID and true #1 spot... (Dispite the…

Quick question here, I had a score posted for 3d03 done with 3 cards. I post another scores with 4 cards and my boints with the 3 cards went away. I tought that it was 2 separate categories so both scores should remain. Am I missing something here?

Hey there Could you have a look into these 2 categories? http://hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/geforce_7300_gs?tab=hall%20of%20fame http://hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/geforce_7300_gs_2_rops?tab=hall%20of%20fame There are so many wrong results in the 7300GS (4 ROPs) Category which should be in 2 ROPs. Thanks & regards Roman "der8auer"

hello i cant seem to validate my scores properly. how do you obtain a validation url for the checksum. i submit the benchmark using 1.55 and it tell me i need to update. i click the 2nd webpage to allow active x control and it takes me to the submission page. i submit it and i get flagged for not haveing a top 20 verification url. please help. i want to submitt properly just cant seem to figure it out. thanks so much joe mehnert

EDIT: Compare URL: http://hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=899805 http://hwbot.org/result.history.do?resultId=899805 This result has been approved by NeoForce today... I reported it last night, thing is I believe Im no#1 on aircooled setup in 2003.... I was wondering about that result for some days, because I dont believe AMD hits as high CPC as P55.... So, I tested it,,,, My results were less then 100K with 4ghz sharp on my 965C3 using one card at stock clocks, using two it was rather 116-117K, bare in mind; quite decent tweaked OS. Now why did I report that result.. Its photoshopped, using a X2 card you will get "Enabled (2 GPUs), Sideport Off", notice how its l…

Hello everybody. I'm not sure if I'm in the correct section of hwbot forums, so I apologize in case I missed something. I have a small question related with GeForce4 MX4000 64-bit VGA drivers. I noticed that back in early 2007 some benchers were using forceware 43.03 or 56.73. I located them, downloaded them and I'm ready to go. Question though: Can I use 'em ? I'm only asking 'cause I think that the card won't be recognized by latest version of GPU-Z. Assuming I find my self in such situation, what am I gonna do ? Open RivaTuner ? But moreover, are they considered to be valid drivers all in all ?

I cant change my signature and it not update for many time (22 out). Is it normal? Thanks

I was benching a new (used) card last night & submitted my scores, looking at other scores in the hall of fame I see that the top 2 guys are using different videocards than the specs for the card I'm submitting x1650 512 mb is the card they are submitting: http://hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/radeon_x1650_ddr2 But x1650 256 mb is the card they are using, it has it's own section to submit to: http://hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/radeon_x1650_pro_ddr2 Says it was checked by a moderator (neoforce), does that mean we can just submit scores for similar hardware that we can get the highest ranking for? (hey I'm only number 6 for my card, if I submit it as this car…

Can you please make visible (for me) the following blocked score ? Cause i cant see it ... it's deleted.

I just can't find how to see the WRs of single cards and multi cards! I mean that I want to see the OLD WAY of looking, were on top were the single cards and down were the multi cards...

Good Day Mods , Please can someone help me understand why its my score blocked ? If so i would like an explanation why this score its block as this score is totally legit run , when i was taking screenshoot with paint the system Frozed , i reboot with same settings and took a screenie of the AM3 run folder wich its much more information than the normal score screenie , run totally legit and i lost that OS so hard to get that AM3 file , consider and compare with my previous score and i ask for this score to be reinstated as all the information its there needed for ranking , please bare in mind all the hard work to get that score . Any help and guidance will be trully ap…