Asrock Z170 OC Formula-DDR4

[l0ud_sil3nc3]

Little board evolution (thanks for never settling Nick)

 

OG is the coated one, missing the next revision (killed in action), rev 3 with cpu cover and retail is the one in use.

 

[Guest Bullant]

Ocfm everywhere ,nice time loud and good to see you posting some 32m

[GtiJason]

What do you guys think add MOCF bios and tools in here or start a new thread?

 

 

i3 6300 ES 1.07 VID running 5Ghz 1.45v aio with no delid, get ready to chop it up along with it's siblings.

 

I think M OCF deserves a thread of it's own, being mixed in with it's big bro will make it hard to find anything in an already busy thread

[speed.fastest]

In my test skylake with larger maxmem = faster time. And i use XP x64 seems around 500ms faster than XP at 2.1GB maxmem. Without maxmem should be much faster but i got no exact in round. I test with i3 6100. In my test larger maxmem = larger wazza.

 

XP x86

 

XP x64

[l0ud_sil3nc3]

In my test skylake with larger maxmem = faster time. And i use XP x64 seems around 500ms faster than XP at 2.1GB maxmem. Without maxmem should be much faster but i got no exact in round. I test with i3 6100. In my test larger maxmem = larger wazza.

 

XP x86

 

XP x64

 

 

32 bit is faster in pi. just need smaller maxmem, lsc etc. . .

[speed.fastest]

32 bit is faster in pi. just need smaller maxmem, lsc etc. . .

 

I use large system cache & wazza.

In other platform before yes i use around 600-740 maxmem (try which is the best), but this when i test 600 maxmem got slow performance i don't know why, bigger maxmem = faster performance. It is just me or anyone same? Because this is repeatable. Or this only in skylake with 3mb cache only? Because i can't compare with other.

[l0ud_sil3nc3]

@speed\.fastest

 

here's a 4G

 

 

and a 4.5 with memory @ 4100 air cooled:

 

 

also new bios to fix a tertiary timing bug (thanks Nick!)

 

http://www.filedropper.com/z17mocf121a

[speed.fastest]

Wow, very strong score. Need to find a way to get those score. Thanks for the reference @l0ud_sil3nc3

[l0ud_sil3nc3]

Wow, very strong score. Need to find a way to get those score. Thanks for the reference @l0ud_sil3nc3

 

Reference 5G

 

 

need to re run these modules on cold again . . .

[l0ud_sil3nc3]

4133 air 1.86v but couldn't catch 4085 run (RTL difference probably)

 

[Guest Bullant]

Nice Loud ^

 

 

 

Couple fail runs can show rtls boost for those getting new ocfm very easy to do rtls on this board,I just set manually rtls and iols 50-51-7-7 or 49-50-6-6 for 4000Mhz cl12,if imc inst up to it with the tighter rtls try little cold on cpu as it helped me.If running say 3733 cl12 set 49-50-7-7 and for tighter 48-49-6-6

 

 

Some 4G retail memory and board with 4000 12-11-11 rtls 50-51-7-7

 

 

 

 

Some 4G retail memory and board with 4000 12-11-11 rtls 49-50-6-6

Edited April 19, 2016 by Bullant

[xxbassplayerxx]

Hey Bull, has anyone posted a 49/50 6/6 run at 4000 that passed? Seems like I've only seen the Impact doing that.

[Guest Bullant]

Hey Bull, has anyone posted a 49/50 6/6 run at 4000 that passed? Seems like I've only seen the Impact doing that.

 

This board will do them,just like everything if your pushing your memory to max it'll fail,loud might be running the tight ones as well

[Sparks.nl]

Does anybody have an idea how to order Asrock z170m ocf in Europe?

[l0ud_sil3nc3]

Nice Loud ^

 

 

 

Couple fail runs can show rtls boost for those getting new ocfm very easy to do rtls on this board,I just set manually rtls and iols 50-51-7-7 or 49-50-6-6 for 4000Mhz cl12,if imc inst up to it with the tighter rtls try little cold on cpu as it helped me.If running say 3733 cl12 set 49-50-7-7 and for tighter 48-49-6-6

 

 

Some 4G retail memory and board with 4000 12-11-11 rtls 50-51-7-7

 

 

 

 

Some 4G retail memory and board with 4000 12-11-11 rtls 49-50-6-6

 

Thanks Bully

 

12-11-11 is where it's at for 4G and seeing that first iteration sub 5 (4.984) only happened once for me but I think this is where it's at for best efficiency at 4Ghz.

 

Higher memory than core / cache seems to not work to well on this platform.

 

Here's a 4100 run with tight RTL's at 4.5 / 4.5 for comparison:

 

[Guest Bullant]

Yes spot on mate I've seen the same at 4ghz you need 4000mhz max with tight as can go fir best eff ,at 4133Mhz for 4ghz is bottle neck and bad eff,5ghz can push the memory 4133 + is good

Edited April 20, 2016 by Bullant

[phobosq]

Does anybody have an idea how to order Asrock z170m ocf in Europe?

 

+1, is the mobo exclusively available in newegg?

[Sparks.nl]

+1, is the mobo exclusively available in newegg?

 

I saw it on Amazon as well. Same story. I can't order outside of the US.

[TaPaKaH]

https://www.cyberport.de/?DEEP=2310-1E4&APID=14

Listed in Germany. At 279€ is very affordable.

[phobosq]

https://www.cyberport.de/?DEEP=2310-1E4&APID=14

Listed in Germany. At 279€ is very affordable.

 

Especially with seller's reputation on geizhals of 1.58/5 and information "Noch nicht verfügbar". I get the irony.

[aerotracks]

How about this one, 328€ with free shipping

http://shop.jacob-computer.de/Mainboards/Intel-Sockel-1151/ASRock-Z170M-OC-Z170M-OC-FORMULA-artnr-2889181.html?gclid=CODL9uWUncwCFSsq0wodXdgCYg

[Sparks.nl]

Yes, much better...

[Random]

If anyone has an issue i can buy in us for 200usd and ship to ya

[KaRtA]

I'm fortunate to have a friend over there ATM, and is bringing one back

 

No shipping fee but just happens to be in one of the states with sales tax. Still very very well priced though. I'm pumped

[Guest Bullant]

I'm fortunate to have a friend over there ATM, and is bringing one back

 

No shipping fee but just happens to be in one of the states with sales tax. Still very very well priced though. I'm pumped

 

Great,you got one man