Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Dear HWBot moderators,

 

I would like to know what's wrong with this 2-year old score, submitted by my team buddy:

 

http://www.hwbot.org/community/submission/696698_xpq_3dmark_2001_geforce_8800_gts_512_mb_91532_marks?tab=info

 

I know benchmark settings are not visible, but it seems in-line with other results. Also, benchmark would display a sign 'Benchmark not run at default settings'. I believe this one could get unlocked, don't you? :cool:

 

Best Regards,

N.

Posted

Dear HWBot moderators,

 

I have a question about how to choose the global point in one benchmark category.

For example, now I have three entries for 3DMark Vantage and two of those earn global points.

One is for 1xGPU and another for 2xGPU.

At this moment, both earn the same 8.7 for global point but both 8.7 are grayed out, resulting in no global point for my Vantage global point counting.

 

http://hwbot.org/listResults.do?userId=27000&applicationId=17

 

The 1xGPU result says "..., but not personal total, as his 2x GPU submission earns more points" and the 2xGPU result says the opposite...

 

I assume that the result calculator can't calculate properly when you have the same global points in one benchmark category.

Maybe the calculator could not decide which is higher because both are the same.

 

Could you please check my result and investigate what happens?

Posted
You're spot on, Gyrock: it seems that the engine has problems when two global results are equal.

 

We'll try to fix it asap.

 

Hi, Massman-san!

Thank you for cheking!

I'm looking forward to hearing from you!

Anyway, thanks a lot for minding my post!

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
rejected by CpuZ means fault in submidding or not valid.

these scores should not be allowed

 

THere s a known problem with CPUZ and Phenoms, possibly because of the fact that you often OC only one core, and not the others. This makes the result uploadable, but it will show as rejected. As long as that problem isn't solved, there's no reason not to allow this type of score. Plus, this particular one has other benchmark runs at a frequency that makes this validation possible (4.8ghz+ superpi 1m for example).

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...