Jerre Posted June 22, 2011 Share Posted June 22, 2011 my scores aren't linked to the achievements anymore... http://hwbot.org/user/jerre/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted June 22, 2011 Share Posted June 22, 2011 Achievements are currently broken. We've added it to the backlog, but other things have higher priority at the moment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christian Ney Posted June 22, 2011 Author Share Posted June 22, 2011 (edited) other things have higher priority at the moment. notifications ? Title: Personal page with overview of which scores dropped and gained points (notifications)updated to major; many requests for the notifications Uptate to critical Edited June 22, 2011 by Christian Ney Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rbuass Posted June 23, 2011 Share Posted June 23, 2011 Hi guys! I was looking for a Pic i did take in a benching session, and noticed that was removed from hwbot in rev.4 The result was removed too (11min 6 sec, Spi32 in a hwbot competition, AMD stage). Why it happens? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I.nfraR.ed Posted June 23, 2011 Share Posted June 23, 2011 Couple of things I noticed: - Results with s.A CPUs in June OC Competition worth 3 bionts according to the bottom table, but when you open a single result it says 2pts. Also not sure if they add to my total points, don't remember how much I had before. http://hwbot.org/competition/hoc_jun11/stage/222_pcmark04:_amd_k7/ - Like rbuass said, there are results which are not linked to the profile, e.g. this one from a competition http://hwbot.org/submission/2154711_i.nfrar.ed_3dmark2001_se_radeon_hd_4890_46099_marks It's not my best 3DMark01 result with HD4890, but I'd like to have all not ranked/old results into my profile just for a reference, like old 3.1 kept all results, unless manually deleted by user. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebanik Posted June 24, 2011 Share Posted June 24, 2011 Why the rush to Rev. 4??? Its way too buggy seriously to have made production environment..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
richba5tard Posted June 24, 2011 Share Posted June 24, 2011 Rev4 was in user acceptance testing (uat.hwbot.org) a month before releasing, and these issues weren't reported by the community nor our own tester. Rev4 is a complete rewrite, not an evolution of rev3. Anyway, we are 5 days from the 4.1 release, many issues have been squashed there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K404 Posted June 24, 2011 Share Posted June 24, 2011 The 3DMark11 leaderboards aren't set to show just a users best score, so the rankings are spammed with tweaked scores from the same people Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrWeez Posted June 24, 2011 Share Posted June 24, 2011 Anyway, we are 5 days from the 4.1 release, many issues have been squashed there. Great job, keep it up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christian Ney Posted June 25, 2011 Author Share Posted June 25, 2011 when a score is moved/edited from a category to an another one, the ranking/scores of the original category are not recalculated Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Turrican Posted June 25, 2011 Crew Share Posted June 25, 2011 when a score is moved/edited from a category to an another one, the ranking/scores of the original category are not recalculated yup, i noted that already. i hope it gets fixed in rev 4.1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christian Ney Posted June 25, 2011 Author Share Posted June 25, 2011 (edited) ok thx, maybe I missed some bugs already reported Another one Would be nice to have back the field where to write ''the reason why you edit the score''. EDIT: found on the backlog Issues: 101 created and 116 resolved Edited June 25, 2011 by Christian Ney Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Strunkenbold Posted June 27, 2011 Crew Share Posted June 27, 2011 strange problem with pentium 3 superpi32m results. In the list every result is 2hxxminxxsec where it should only be 1hxxminxxsec look here for instance.. http://www.hwbot.org/hardware/processor/pentium_3_celeron_1.0a_ghz_tualatin/ still there... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christian Ney Posted June 30, 2011 Author Share Posted June 30, 2011 The # of core active field is back for unlocked cpu, but it doesn't seem to work. I changed from 2core to 4core and it's still in the 2core category http://hwbot.org/submission/1066392_techf2_wprime_32m_phenom_ii_x2_550_8sec_62ms Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christian Ney Posted June 30, 2011 Author Share Posted June 30, 2011 impossible to edit a score that have been submited for a competition when the competition is over Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
richba5tard Posted June 30, 2011 Share Posted June 30, 2011 FYI I only fix stuff for which a issue is created in jira (bugs.hwbot.org), otherwise there is no way to keep an oversight and plan stuff. If massman does not add a bug you reported to jira, please poke him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IanCutress Posted June 30, 2011 Share Posted June 30, 2011 Is the achievements the way you wanted? Because I'm top 30 in Enthusiast, I now get the achievement for being in top 50. Depends if you want different achievements for Enthusiast ranking and OC leagues. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Gappo Posted June 30, 2011 Share Posted June 30, 2011 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrSwizz Posted June 30, 2011 Share Posted June 30, 2011 HWBot broken, data corruption? Please forgive me if this is an issue that the HWBot crew already is aware of, I have not actively been following this thread. I was idly browsing the results database and I have seem to have come across a serious bug or possibly database corruption. I was viewing CPU-Z results of old CPUs and when I clicked on the validation link for one of Christian Neys results the validation link was for a the wrong result. I figured he must have made a mistake and I made a mental note to send him a PM later. Then I came across another CPU-Z result that he had made with a link that also was wrong, in fact both links where to the same result. This made suspicious; Perhaps v4.x of HWBot has broken something? So I started browsing his CPU-Z results and it turns out that plenty of them have links are wrong (all Pentium-class CPUs?). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christian Ney Posted June 30, 2011 Author Share Posted June 30, 2011 (edited) hahhhh, if all of the ''broken'' submissions are mine, it's normal I always put the same validation link for my Pentium 1 submissions, maybe even Cyrix and Pentium MMX. It's due that CPUZ 1.56 wasn't working on my GA-5AX. I don't know why everytime I tried to press F7 or F5, I had nor validation file nor screenshot file. So I always provided a screenshot showing the real CPU Frequency like: But if you know how to work last CPUZ + GA-5AX + Pentium/Cyrix, feel free to tell me it would be amazing Edited June 30, 2011 by Christian Ney Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrSwizz Posted June 30, 2011 Share Posted June 30, 2011 Sorry, I didn't know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christian Ney Posted June 30, 2011 Author Share Posted June 30, 2011 (edited) np, I wrote it on the comment maybe for some results, but maybe not all. Yeah this bug I have with last CPUZ+GA-5AX+Pentium/Cyrix really sux EDIT: @ Turrican, let's PM, to not be offtopic here Edited June 30, 2011 by Christian Ney Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Turrican Posted June 30, 2011 Crew Share Posted June 30, 2011 hmm, used my ga-5ax a few days ago and had no problems. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.Scott Posted June 30, 2011 Share Posted June 30, 2011 hahhhh, if all of the ''broken'' submissions are mine, it's normal I always put the same validation link for my Pentium 1 submissions, maybe even Cyrix and Pentium MMX. It's due that CPUZ 1.56 wasn't working on my GA-5AX. I don't know why everytime I tried to press F7 or F5, I had nor validation file nor screenshot file. So I always provided a screenshot showing the real CPU Frequency like: But if you know how to work last CPUZ + GA-5AX + Pentium/Cyrix, feel free to tell me it would be amazing Seriously?? That makes those submissions invalid due to improper SS. I've seen other's submissions blocked for that here. hmm, used my ga-5ax a few days ago and had no problems. Interesting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christian Ney Posted July 1, 2011 Author Share Posted July 1, 2011 Interesting. I am interested,Did you used a Pentium CPU ? Which version of CPUZ ? Maybe there is something related with bios settings i made a validation with my ga-5ax and a mobile mmx 266. but i just saw it was done with cpu-z 1.52 ~1.5 years ago. i tested a few pcmark04 run last week with the ga-5ax and no problems with cpu-z. but i didn't test if i could make validations. regards, karl Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts