Benchmark software

Have anyone else has this problem today ? Futuremark / UL validation website is down completely , it says: check back in a few minutes as we are building something great ? It's been a few hours today and still down. Can someone else confirm this , please ? Thanks. When i try to submit any validation file this is what comes up for me:

I've downloaded MaxxMem from official website, but there's no HWBot submission page in this benchmark. All it has is this main window without any scores like others used for submission. There should be this submission window, but can't find it anywhere:

KRIEG MathBenchmark cant be submited giving error:

Just made 4 submissions for GPUPi (via Benchmate Datafile) and non of them appeared in my submissions. Is it broken atm ?

The code provided at the futuremark site gives me the advanced edition, which doesn't display the score, I believe I need the professional version for that. Anyone have a code for professional? 32 bit if it matters.

Anyone knows what's wrong with Fire Strike Combined scores ? Why are they fluctuates so much ? Any way to fix this? Here's 3 runs at the same GPU/CPU/RAM freq at same windows 10 session. Absolutely clean system, no background processes running, no throttling etc.

It seems PCMark softwares keep sticking to the same old story of being a nightmare to get working on various platforms. I am trying to use Windows 7 as it clearly states it being compatible on their own homepage for the Express version. The Video conf part wont start unless (according to UL input) the native Intel driver is installed somehow in parallel with the external GPU. Preferable both active in multi gpu mode. I somehow got that fixed with running my 8700K Internal GPU so it activates standard driver as no Intel driver exists for that particular GPU in win7. UL seems to blame Nvidia for this but I have tested with both Nvidia and Radeon and see same issue. I…

I have been testing the latest update of FM 3dmark suite and on my testing i found it it does score lower ~500-800 points , all this points are missing in all 3dmarks FS , TS , PR , etc ... Shall we use older version of 3dmark ? since the scores do not line up with the older versions because this big update and so many changes . What are you guys thought on this ?

How is it possible that i’m getting 30k lower points at the same cpu/gpu/OS config even with higher clocks? what’s the issue or secret tweak for this test? https://www.3dmark.com/compare/3dm03/6548254/3dm03/6548414#

Do you need to actually own VR equipment or can I just run the benchmark software like a normal 3D benchmark? Just want to know so I don't purchase the software since I don't own any of the 3d headsets or anything. There are not enough 3D benchmarks allowed on Windows 10.

I've just uploaded XTU results and it says that i'm using engineering sample or unreleased hardware? Why ? And after submission it says that "Aurosonic has chosen to disable all rankings for his/her submissions." but i didn't do that.

Hi, I made a few bench marks over the past 3 days. Apparently every tweak I made got me a lower score. So I attempted to import my 1st score profile. When I hover over my online mark, it says 75% compatible. How can I only be 75% compatible if its the same system and myself? I haven't changed any hardware. Thanks!, Lou

Hi. I'm trying to get some decent scores in old PCMark04 and PCMark07, but i've encountered some FPS limitation issues with Graphics Memory - 64 lines tests. I guess it's 2D test. No such issues with 3D tests. Screenshot below shows the priblem. Does anyone knows how to bypass this 2D framerate limitation locked with display refresh rate? Maybe it's somehow related to Windows 10 DWM registry settings ? PS: Vertical sync forced off as well as G-Sync. And second question: WMV Video compression test almost twice more FPS on Windows 10 comparing to Windows 7. Anyone knows how to fix this ?

Hi! I have a problem with aqua. I had this problem with some before, but the last was a GTX 260 216S. This is the capture of the problem http://k33.kn3.net/A/1/3/C/4/0/331.jpg only happens to me sometimes and i dont know why. Thanks!

This is something i have been scratching my head over for a few months now. Futuremark / UL has some obvious problems when it comes to score validation , it has failed in my opinion to address this issue that has been brought up to their attention by many users. There are a lot of obvious invalid results by any standards but it is approved and mark as valid ??? Take this example of what is going on and prof that Shenanigans are going on with validation approved , tampered with scores. There is a guy with multiple accounts on Futuremark / UL by the name of Escapee / Escapeee / IKasHI / and i believe he might have other accounts with other nicknames ( Might be H2o…

Hello. Our benchmark list still does not contain a simple GPU OpenCL test. I remembered that there is an old test from Folding@Home community. Version 1.2.0 was released in 2012. Today it contains an outdated kernel, but works well as a synthetic test. The program itself is simple with a minimum of settings. Current version is 2.3, it is too complicated with settings. The benchmark is susceptible to core frequency and driver version. I do not know the legal nuances, but my opinion would be not bad to include this benchpark in the general list. The test itself shows how long the protein folding process can be calculated by the video card during the day.

Hi, Am using double Xeon's on a MB. When i upload the scores the report files only consider 1 CPU thus it ignores that there are two distinct CPU's. this both on GPUPI 3.2 and GPU3.3.3. even in the naming of the file in 3.3.3 version the name state 1x

Hello everyone! Long story short, someone developed an app called AsusZenStates, originally meant to give the user control over P-States on first gen Zen CPUs, with some additional options. It was ASUS motherboards only. However, he doesn't support it anymore and made it open-source. I've made an own fork and now trying to support it for all Ryzen generations and for all motherboard vendors. Since Zen2 launch things have changed significantly in the way some things are controlled through the SMU and MSRs. The lack of meaningful public documentation from AMD side makes it really difficult, especially for a person like me. I'm a front-end developer and don't have …

K gents Maxon just released a new Cinebench version23 By default it is a 10 minute stress test looping the rendered scene similar to R20 In the advanced tab we can turn off the time duration so it renders just one benchmark like the previous Cinebench versions. Or we go half way and choose a custom duration of eg 5minutes

Hello , i'm experiencing a weird bug in all 3dmark benchmarks ( TS , FS , etc... ) , systeminfo is disabling itself when running any benchmark while running 2xsli rtx3090. The screen flickers for a few seconds during systeminfo scan and it will start the benchmark , it will run normal and the scores are normal but when i submit for online validation it says is valid result but also says systeminfo was disable ??? I already open a ticket at futuremark/UL , they have not responded back to me yet. I see no one yet has submitted this configuration 2xsli rtx 3090 , no subs yet here on hwbot , so i guess i'm the beta tester lol . Configuration is as follows: ASRock x…

Good day I am hoping that I am posting this in the correct area of the forum so I upfront apologize if this is the case. I am quite new on HWbot forum but have been putting scores up on Hwbot.org for a while now. I go under the username wimpievanzyl. I was wondering if any of the pro`s on here can help with some tweaks or suggestions to get Cinebench R15 to score better? I either have not fully tweaked/stripped my OS or I suspect I am running not the correct version of Cinebench R15 that most benchers on this platform are using. I am running a x299 Dark with a 10980xe chip and also 32gb of Teamforce Dark 3200CL14 RAM so on the hardware side I think I am well of…

Will be the new Benchmark added: 3D Mark Wild Life 3D Mark Wild Life Unlimited ??

Hello pcmr I'm new to overclocking but I have been doing it to my i7-4960x and since this is an older processor I was wondering what are some good benchmarking software to use on this old Ivy Bridge-E cpu?essay writer

So usually these linux topic don't end well, but is the Linux subsystem for windows allowed in cases like Geekbench? I can use CPU-Z and everything but the benchmark itself technically runs on linux, and the performance is slightly better.

Geekbench 5 has landed today. It officially requires Windows 10 (64 bit) for the first time. I've looked into it from a technical standpoint and it doesn't fix anything related to timers or security. It uses QPC and GetSystemTime(), both highly unreliable and easily attackable, and both will skew with bclock/reference clock on Pre-Skylake and all AMD CPUs on Windows 10. The negligence seriously amazes me. BenchMate to the rescue! I've already integrated Geekbench 5 into BenchMate and released a new version: BenchMate 0.9.1 Geekbench 5 is also bundled with the "Big Package", no need to install it. I've also taken the liberty to add Geekbench 5 as a b…