-> Validated score still wrong? Let us know here

[Oki]

Ok so i need to do 01 in xp and i will gain 5 000 points, doesn't matter if mine E8500 is clocked at 4.4 ghz and his Core 2 E6400@ 3623mhz.

 

Ok i did not know that. But sure i can do mine test again, not a problem, just don't have hdd with xp here atm...what would be on xp than ? i will gain like 10k points ?

 

ok I have repeated 01mark with details, and yes - he did beat me like in every subtest !?

 

Edited November 24, 2009 by Oki
new screenie

[K404]

Your score will deffo be better. I forgot to say last night... with that little GPU power, the CPU wont make as big-a difference as you'd expect. The GPU controls most of the score

[Turrican]

I have sent this message to first moderator on line, and sorry Turrican that was you, but maybe here i could find answer for my question.

 

no problem.

 

i just read it.

sorry, when you wrote this pm is was a already in bed sleeping.

[Steven86]

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=924242

 

I'm sorry but i placed my score in the wrong category getting unfair points for that . Could you move it from the no BE to the BE cpu class?

 

Phenom 2 X3 720BE should it be

 

Thx and sorry for the mistake.

[boostisbest]

hi people i submited a new score afew days ago now can someone check it please

[Coolbits]

Hi guys, someone have moved my score http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=875323

in a wrong category, my graphc card is a 7600LE (see the screen and photos ) please move back

in the right place. Thanks

 

 

 

[boostisbest]

bump on my last post

[Coolbits]

hey mod news about my submission?

 

 

Hi guys, someone have moved my score http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=875323

in a wrong category, my graphc card is a 7600LE (see the screen and photos ) please move back

in the right place. Thanks

 

 

 

[ScunnyUK]

Hi,

This score is way to high for the gpu clock speeds of 672/1659/480!!!>

 

http://hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=907559

 

Look at result in second place with simula clocked cpu but gpu clocks of 926/2286/580 and his score is 2000 3d marks lower!!!>

 

http://hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=888274

 

Possibly bugged run or MipMap cheat?

 

Reported his 3Dmark05 score aswell .

 

http://hwbot.org/listResults.do?gpuModelId=1305&applicationId=2&filterUser=true&filterBlocked=true&sli=false&limit=100

 

Thanks

Scunny.

Edited November 29, 2009 by ScunnyUK
Linked to wrong result.

[K404]

http://hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=811786

 

SM3 scores look high for the clocks- especially Deep Freeze. LN2 cooled 9800GTX scores cant touch it. The guy doesnt participate in rankings and the result has been checked but I dunno how the score is possible?

 

-> Its the only top 5 score in the 9800GTX/GTX+/ GTS250 categories where SM3 score is > SM2

Edited December 2, 2009 by K404

[Mr.Scott]

Can someone check this please? No CPU-Z validation, only a SS. Says it was previously moderated and ok'ed. How, with no validation? tia

http://hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=732841

[topdog]

wprime score seems lot too fast

 

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=924589

 

validation link links to wPrime v200 submitted on 25/Nov/2009 03:10:15 but it was scanned by hwbot on 24-11-2009 05:14

Screenshot looks photoshopped.....CPU-Z corners are round at top and square at bottom

[knopflerbruce]

wprime score seems lot too fast

 

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=924589

 

validation link links to wPrime v200 submitted on 25/Nov/2009 03:10:15 but it was scanned by hwbot on 24-11-2009 05:14

Screenshot looks photoshopped.....CPU-Z corners are round at top and square at bottom

 

I'll have a chat with the others about the possibilit of PS. The score looks weird, like one PII 925 and a Athlon II 250 have been "merged". The screenshot shows v1.55 and a different time, so I changed it - 19.5s sounds more reasonable for that CPU at that frequency:)

[topdog]

thanks knopflerbruce

[topdog]

the score is now inline with others because knopflerbruce has corrected it, thanks.

[Mr.Scott]

score submission date: 07-05-2008 (7 May 2008)

CPu-Z rule which says you need CPU-Z validation: 20-05-2008

 

score was valid at time it was posted.

Fair enough, thank you.

Also, as long as I have your attention, how about moving this

http://hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=747315

to the proper catagory. Notice the multiplier in the SS is 4.5, which is what a 133 bus speed PIII 600 Coppermine is, not a 6 multiplier that the 100 bus speed 600 is supposed to have. See attached links below.

http://www.cpu-world.com/CPUs/Pentium-III/Intel-Pentium%20III%20600%20-%20RB80526PY600256%20(BX80526F600256).html

http://www.cpu-world.com/CPUs/Pentium-III/Intel-Pentium%20III%20600%20-%20RB80526PZ600256%20(BX80526C600256%20-%20BX80526C600256E).html

Thanks in advance.

[tiborrr]

I was just checking my old scores and found out this. It was reported several times with valid reasons but it was still checked as valid by moderator

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=667015

 

22 Nov 2007 07:19 created Ferdinand manual online submission

15 Dec 2007 06:10 reported chavo fucks reported by user due to possible cheat (Look the window whit the 3dmark result and you read "The benchmark was not run using default settings". It's relevant to see, I don't know if this is allowed or not, but is really suspect. Thank you.)

22 Jan 2008 12:13 reported wanako reported by user due to possible cheat (The bench was not run using default settings?)

22 Jan 2008 05:23 checked (crew) o polonos checked by a moderator ()

[71proste]

I have reported few suspicious scores uploaded by the same user .

3Dmark01 single 8400 GS 256mb TOP 10

 

delly 31794 marks 690/550/1380 @ e8600/5.5Ghz nature 206fps/draghotic low 468fps/lobby low 545fps

vs

Johny Bravo 30325 901/602/2238 @ e8600/5.4Ghz nature 151fps/draghotic low 383fps/lobby low 381fps

SAV 29144 900/560/2214 @ i7 920/4.6Ghz nature 146fps/draghotic low 367fps/lobby low 374fps

 

My question : how is that possible that he scored 1.5-4k marks more than others using much less gpu/mem/shaders speed ?

 

3dmark03 same category

delly 10716 690/550/1380 wings of fury 342fps

vs

01001 10690 830/570/2100 wings of fury 290fps

12 10580 777/611/1554 wings of fury 299fps

SAV 10539 900/555/2214 wings of fury 278fps

 

I already know NeoForce opinion but I disagree and I would like to ask other moderators .

I think these results should be take under consideration

I might be wrong too

 

2003 category

http://hwbot.org/searchResults.do?direction=&applicationId=2&numberOfVideocards=1&gpu=GeForce+8400+GS+%28G86%29+256+Mb+%28629%29&numberOfProcessors=0&cpu=&chipset=&manufacturer=&model=&minCpuFreq=&maxCpuFreq=&minGpuCoreFreq=&maxGpuCoreFreq=&minGpuMemFreq=&maxGpuMemFreq=&countryId=0&teamId=0&userName=&minScore=&maxScore=&gpuId=1187&cpuId=0&chipsetId=0&modelId=0&manufacturerId=0&offset=0&displayAdvanced=false&filterBlocked=true&dateFrom=&dateUntil=&system=&minTotalPoints=

2001 category

http://hwbot.org/searchResults.do?direction=&applicationId=1&numberOfVideocards=1&gpu=GeForce+8400+GS+%28G86%29+256+Mb+%28629%29&numberOfProcessors=0&cpu=&chipset=&manufacturer=&model=&minCpuFreq=&maxCpuFreq=&minGpuCoreFreq=&maxGpuCoreFreq=&minGpuMemFreq=&maxGpuMemFreq=&countryId=0&teamId=0&userName=&minScore=&maxScore=&gpuId=1187&cpuId=0&chipsetId=0&modelId=0&manufacturerId=0&offset=0&displayAdvanced=false&filterBlocked=true&dateFrom=&dateUntil=&system=&minTotalPoints=

Edited December 9, 2009 by 71proste

[Jor3llBR/Elano]

Hi can someone look into this WR: http://hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=929511

 

I got a 9.093s and the 1st place has 9.094s and I'm still showing ranked 2nd place .

[Jor3llBR/Elano]

Hi can someone look into this WR: http://hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=929511

 

I got a 9.093s and the 1st place has 9.094s and I'm still showing ranked 2nd place .

 

Never mind I just lowered my score

[Johnksss]

ok, so what happend to all the ES scores in the Vantage section?

[joemehnert]

http://hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=925567

 

hi

i got this score blocked. why? i meet all the requirements with the screen shot. THanks

[TASOS]

Someone from hwbot team .... must take a look at the whole 9800GT DDR2 category.

[T0lsty]

all cpu category "p9400"

look at this result : http://hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=921696

and all other walhalla's results in this category .

p9400 is mobile core 2 duo proc 2.4ghz (http://processorfinder.intel.com/details.aspx?sSpec=SLB64)

but in walhalla's verification (http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=831051) cpu-z says : mobile core 2 quad (extreme) .

it is not P9400 !

 

so all his results on this cpu must be posted in another category . i think its qx9300 , there is no other mobile core 2 quad with 12mb L2 .

[Don_Dan]

Can someone please unblock this score http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=919030

 

It dropped out of top 20 and doesn't need a FM link any more.

 

Edit: Thanks!

Edited December 11, 2009 by Don_Dan