4 hours ago, yosarianilives said:

I would like to report a bug in the configuration for the gpupi 1b single core comp limitations @Leeghoofd

Example A: https://hwbot.org/submission/3978772 

Fastest damn single core I've ever seen

Link not working, or was but not anymore

This sub should not be linked in the competition, it is 8700K....

https://hwbot.org/submission/3978945

6 hours ago, yosarianilives said:

I would like to report a bug in the configuration for the gpupi 1b single core comp limitations @Leeghoofd

Example A: https://hwbot.org/submission/3978772 

Fastest damn single core I've ever seen

@bolc Since the sub's been removed I'll mention it was a 9900K @ 5GHz score.

Sorry if this was answered but I couldn't see a definitive answer. For the motherboard frequency stage we are ranking by what socket the motherboard is right and not the CPU used? Reason I ask is for the AMD issue with 2+ through to 3+. I believe it should be motherboards socket but am fine with either.

Dont worry about benching other cards for Timespy, just a single 2080ti all you need.

On 11/9/2018 at 10:27 AM, bolc said:

hi all.
sorry if this has already been covered... but are sockets 1151 based on chipset 1xx 2xx and 3xx all considered to be the same and unique, for cpu stages 1 ,2 etc ?
i d think 1xx and 2xx as 1151 v1 and 3xx aa 1151 v2, but when you submit 7700k and 8700k, only the best remains. hence I suppose you adopted the POV of a unique 1151 socket ?
thanks

Bump

Thanks

7 hours ago, bolc said:

Bump

Thanks

I thought @Leeghoofd had asked richba5tard to add 1151 v2, but in the database there's only LGA1151 right now, which is including all Core i7 6xxx, 7xxx, 8xxxx and 9xxxx.

Yep I did, will task again ....

This has been mentioned I think, but why is it even allowed to sub a dual gpu score for timespy stage? https://hwbot.org/submission/3982468 of course this score would be removed for lack of background anyways...

For stage 10, can the number of submissions required be added back to the title?

This one ended up in the Night Raid stage somehow
https://hwbot.org/submission/3985742

And same user for 3DMark 2001
https://hwbot.org/submission/3985710

And one more time for 3DMark05
https://hwbot.org/submission/3985722

And yet again for GPUPI
https://hwbot.org/submission/3985670

Edited November 18, 20186 yr by Bilko
Added more

all the stages seem to be broken in the submission rules i mean just to be non-partisan look at time spy stage for USA http://hwbot.org/search/submissions/permalink?ids=3981805,3977017,3983075,3985937,3976725  i mean i'm sure theres more messed up but surely setting up the stages correctly will reduce your guy's hard work in removing bad subs later...   

I uploaded a Country Cup 2018 - HWBOT x265 Benchmark - 4k score using Socket AM4 / Ryzen 3 2200G but it does not show in the team contribution ranking. Bilko had an AM4 / Ryzen 7 2700X score but he has since uploaded an X399 / 2920X score, should his higher score negate his earlier (lower) score from the other socket?

Team contribution Ranking: http://hwbot.org/search/submissions/permalink?ids=3989335,3979946,3977419,3978694

My 2200G score: http://hwbot.org/submission/3989627_cbjaust_hwbot_x265_benchmark___4k_ryzen_3_2200g_4.717_fps/

Bilko's 2700X score: http://hwbot.org/submission/3987847_bilko_hwbot_x265_benchmark___4k_ryzen_7_2700x_10.774_fps

Bilko's 2920X score: http://hwbot.org/submission/3989335_bilko_hwbot_x265_benchmark___4k_ryzen_threadripper_2920x_16.328_fps

Edited November 22, 20186 yr by cbjaust
add links

I would think so but I'm not 100% sure how the comp rankings work hah. I can remove his 2700x score if desired.

1 minute ago, GeorgeStorm said:

I would think so but I'm not 100% sure how the comp rankings work hah. I can remove his 2700x score if desired.

Better ask Bilko I guess... Thanks Gearge.

6 minutes ago, cbjaust said:

I uploaded a Country Cup 2018 - HWBOT x265 Benchmark - 4k score using Socket AM4 / Ryzen 3 2200G but it does not show in the team contribution ranking. Bilko had an AM4 / Ryzen 7 2700X score but he has since uploaded an X399 / 2920X score, should his higher score negate his earlier (lower) score from the other socket?

Team contribution Ranking: http://hwbot.org/search/submissions/permalink?ids=3989335,3979946,3977419,3978694

My 2200G score: http://hwbot.org/submission/3989627_cbjaust_hwbot_x265_benchmark___4k_ryzen_3_2200g_4.717_fps/

Bilko's 2700X score: http://hwbot.org/submission/3987847_bilko_hwbot_x265_benchmark___4k_ryzen_7_2700x_10.774_fps

Bilko's 2920X score: http://hwbot.org/submission/3989335_bilko_hwbot_x265_benchmark___4k_ryzen_threadripper_2920x_16.328_fps

I just deleted my 2700X sub, that restored your 2200G one even though that really should happen automatically. ?

Looks like I'm missing something. Admittedly, I haven't been keeping up with HWBOT rules very well lately. Anybody know what I'm doing wrong here?
 

http://hwbot.org/submission/3990096_

 

Thx!

Hi,
I can't pass my Asus vii impact for the bench reference.
He puts me there. viii impact, otherwise he refuses.
I still posted it;
thank you

Ackerman

Edited November 23, 20186 yr by christopheorhan

11 hours ago, Dead Things said:

Looks like I'm missing something. Admittedly, I haven't been keeping up with HWBOT rules very well lately. Anybody know what I'm doing wrong here?
 

http://hwbot.org/submission/3990096_

 

Thx!

I think that has something to do with the scoring on a per core basis... did you use the submit score button from the competition page or the regular submit score button? I have found the same problem when using the regular button for certain competion scores... (can't remember which exactly)

Should work:

Doesn't work for some comp benches:

Beauty - that worked! Thanks a bunch cbjaust!

hey alby

in the early stages you said gpupi 3.3 for the AMD CPU stage, is that still a thing? Or are we capped at 3.2 for both?

the GPUPI for GPU stage says 3.2 limit, the CPU stage doesnt mention

Cheers

GPUPI  for CPU is capped at 3.2...

 

Matt is gonna redo the faster 3.3 and will prolly label it as 4.0, so no need to bench this one anymore

Hmm,  why is GPU-Z sensors tab required for CC? Cooling methods are unlimited as far as I know, so not because of temps... this is not LCC, so no clock limit either. Most people (me included) open the GPU-Z after the run is finished... so there is nothing to see besides idle status of the GPU.

I don't mind putting extra window on the screenshot, just don't see the point as it shows no relevant info.

2 minutes ago, havli said:

Hmm,  why is GPU-Z sensors tab required for CC? Cooling methods are unlimited as far as I know, so not because of temps... this is not LCC, so no clock limit either. Most people (me included) open the GPU-Z after the run is finished... so there is nothing to see besides idle status of the GPU.

I don't mind putting extra window on the screenshot, just don't see the point as it shows no relevant info.

Run the render test and it will show the boost clocks.

Yes, but most likely different clocks than you actualy have when running 3DMark. Also the rules say just "A verification screenshot is required, including motherboard and GPU sensor tabs ". I take it as - sensors must be present on the screenshot but doesn't matter when you run it and what it shows.

8 hours ago, cbjaust said:

Run the render test and it will show the boost clocks.

Doesn't work so well for some cards