bolc Posted November 10, 2018 Posted November 10, 2018 4 hours ago, yosarianilives said: I would like to report a bug in the configuration for the gpupi 1b single core comp limitations @Leeghoofd Example A: https://hwbot.org/submission/3978772 Fastest damn single core I've ever seen Link not working, or was but not anymore This sub should not be linked in the competition, it is 8700K.... https://hwbot.org/submission/3978945 Quote
Cautilus Posted November 10, 2018 Posted November 10, 2018 6 hours ago, yosarianilives said: I would like to report a bug in the configuration for the gpupi 1b single core comp limitations @Leeghoofd Example A: https://hwbot.org/submission/3978772 Fastest damn single core I've ever seen @bolc Since the sub's been removed I'll mention it was a 9900K @ 5GHz score. Quote
ObscureParadox Posted November 11, 2018 Posted November 11, 2018 Sorry if this was answered but I couldn't see a definitive answer. For the motherboard frequency stage we are ranking by what socket the motherboard is right and not the CPU used? Reason I ask is for the AMD issue with 2+ through to 3+. I believe it should be motherboards socket but am fine with either. Quote
zeropluszero Posted November 11, 2018 Posted November 11, 2018 Dont worry about benching other cards for Timespy, just a single 2080ti all you need. Quote
bolc Posted November 13, 2018 Posted November 13, 2018 On 11/9/2018 at 10:27 AM, bolc said: hi all. sorry if this has already been covered... but are sockets 1151 based on chipset 1xx 2xx and 3xx all considered to be the same and unique, for cpu stages 1 ,2 etc ? i d think 1xx and 2xx as 1151 v1 and 3xx aa 1151 v2, but when you submit 7700k and 8700k, only the best remains. hence I suppose you adopted the POV of a unique 1151 socket ? thanks Bump Thanks Quote
Crew Don_Dan Posted November 13, 2018 Crew Posted November 13, 2018 7 hours ago, bolc said: Bump Thanks I thought @Leeghoofd had asked richba5tard to add 1151 v2, but in the database there's only LGA1151 right now, which is including all Core i7 6xxx, 7xxx, 8xxxx and 9xxxx. Quote
Crew Leeghoofd Posted November 14, 2018 Author Crew Posted November 14, 2018 Yep I did, will task again .... Quote
yosarianilives Posted November 14, 2018 Posted November 14, 2018 This has been mentioned I think, but why is it even allowed to sub a dual gpu score for timespy stage? https://hwbot.org/submission/3982468 of course this score would be removed for lack of background anyways... Quote
yee245 Posted November 15, 2018 Posted November 15, 2018 For stage 10, can the number of submissions required be added back to the title? Quote
Crew Bilko Posted November 18, 2018 Crew Posted November 18, 2018 (edited) This one ended up in the Night Raid stage somehowhttps://hwbot.org/submission/3985742 And same user for 3DMark 2001https://hwbot.org/submission/3985710 And one more time for 3DMark05https://hwbot.org/submission/3985722 And yet again for GPUPIhttps://hwbot.org/submission/3985670 Edited November 18, 2018 by Bilko Added more 4 1 Quote
Frito11 Posted November 18, 2018 Posted November 18, 2018 all the stages seem to be broken in the submission rules i mean just to be non-partisan look at time spy stage for USA http://hwbot.org/search/submissions/permalink?ids=3981805,3977017,3983075,3985937,3976725 i mean i'm sure theres more messed up but surely setting up the stages correctly will reduce your guy's hard work in removing bad subs later... 1 Quote
cbjaust Posted November 22, 2018 Posted November 22, 2018 (edited) I uploaded a Country Cup 2018 - HWBOT x265 Benchmark - 4k score using Socket AM4 / Ryzen 3 2200G but it does not show in the team contribution ranking. Bilko had an AM4 / Ryzen 7 2700X score but he has since uploaded an X399 / 2920X score, should his higher score negate his earlier (lower) score from the other socket? Team contribution Ranking: http://hwbot.org/search/submissions/permalink?ids=3989335,3979946,3977419,3978694 My 2200G score: http://hwbot.org/submission/3989627_cbjaust_hwbot_x265_benchmark___4k_ryzen_3_2200g_4.717_fps/ Bilko's 2700X score: http://hwbot.org/submission/3987847_bilko_hwbot_x265_benchmark___4k_ryzen_7_2700x_10.774_fps Bilko's 2920X score: http://hwbot.org/submission/3989335_bilko_hwbot_x265_benchmark___4k_ryzen_threadripper_2920x_16.328_fps Edited November 22, 2018 by cbjaust add links Quote
Members GeorgeStorm Posted November 22, 2018 Members Posted November 22, 2018 I would think so but I'm not 100% sure how the comp rankings work hah. I can remove his 2700x score if desired. Quote
cbjaust Posted November 22, 2018 Posted November 22, 2018 1 minute ago, GeorgeStorm said: I would think so but I'm not 100% sure how the comp rankings work hah. I can remove his 2700x score if desired. Better ask Bilko I guess... Thanks Gearge. Quote
Crew Bilko Posted November 22, 2018 Crew Posted November 22, 2018 6 minutes ago, cbjaust said: I uploaded a Country Cup 2018 - HWBOT x265 Benchmark - 4k score using Socket AM4 / Ryzen 3 2200G but it does not show in the team contribution ranking. Bilko had an AM4 / Ryzen 7 2700X score but he has since uploaded an X399 / 2920X score, should his higher score negate his earlier (lower) score from the other socket? Team contribution Ranking: http://hwbot.org/search/submissions/permalink?ids=3989335,3979946,3977419,3978694 My 2200G score: http://hwbot.org/submission/3989627_cbjaust_hwbot_x265_benchmark___4k_ryzen_3_2200g_4.717_fps/ Bilko's 2700X score: http://hwbot.org/submission/3987847_bilko_hwbot_x265_benchmark___4k_ryzen_7_2700x_10.774_fps Bilko's 2920X score: http://hwbot.org/submission/3989335_bilko_hwbot_x265_benchmark___4k_ryzen_threadripper_2920x_16.328_fps I just deleted my 2700X sub, that restored your 2200G one even though that really should happen automatically. ? 1 Quote
Dead Things Posted November 23, 2018 Posted November 23, 2018 Looks like I'm missing something. Admittedly, I haven't been keeping up with HWBOT rules very well lately. Anybody know what I'm doing wrong here? http://hwbot.org/submission/3990096_ Thx! Quote
Chaton22 Posted November 23, 2018 Posted November 23, 2018 (edited) Hi, I can't pass my Asus vii impact for the bench reference. He puts me there. viii impact, otherwise he refuses. I still posted it; thank you Ackerman Edited November 23, 2018 by christopheorhan Quote
cbjaust Posted November 23, 2018 Posted November 23, 2018 11 hours ago, Dead Things said: Looks like I'm missing something. Admittedly, I haven't been keeping up with HWBOT rules very well lately. Anybody know what I'm doing wrong here? http://hwbot.org/submission/3990096_ Thx! I think that has something to do with the scoring on a per core basis... did you use the submit score button from the competition page or the regular submit score button? I have found the same problem when using the regular button for certain competion scores... (can't remember which exactly) Should work: Doesn't work for some comp benches: Quote
Dead Things Posted November 23, 2018 Posted November 23, 2018 Beauty - that worked! Thanks a bunch cbjaust! 1 Quote
Crew pro Posted November 26, 2018 Crew Posted November 26, 2018 hey alby in the early stages you said gpupi 3.3 for the AMD CPU stage, is that still a thing? Or are we capped at 3.2 for both? the GPUPI for GPU stage says 3.2 limit, the CPU stage doesnt mention Cheers Quote
Crew Leeghoofd Posted November 26, 2018 Author Crew Posted November 26, 2018 GPUPI for CPU is capped at 3.2... Matt is gonna redo the faster 3.3 and will prolly label it as 4.0, so no need to bench this one anymore 1 1 Quote
havli Posted November 26, 2018 Posted November 26, 2018 Hmm, why is GPU-Z sensors tab required for CC? Cooling methods are unlimited as far as I know, so not because of temps... this is not LCC, so no clock limit either. Most people (me included) open the GPU-Z after the run is finished... so there is nothing to see besides idle status of the GPU. I don't mind putting extra window on the screenshot, just don't see the point as it shows no relevant info. 1 1 Quote
cbjaust Posted November 26, 2018 Posted November 26, 2018 2 minutes ago, havli said: Hmm, why is GPU-Z sensors tab required for CC? Cooling methods are unlimited as far as I know, so not because of temps... this is not LCC, so no clock limit either. Most people (me included) open the GPU-Z after the run is finished... so there is nothing to see besides idle status of the GPU. I don't mind putting extra window on the screenshot, just don't see the point as it shows no relevant info. Run the render test and it will show the boost clocks. Quote
havli Posted November 26, 2018 Posted November 26, 2018 Yes, but most likely different clocks than you actualy have when running 3DMark. Also the rules say just "A verification screenshot is required, including motherboard and GPU sensor tabs ". I take it as - sensors must be present on the screenshot but doesn't matter when you run it and what it shows. Quote
Crew Bilko Posted November 27, 2018 Crew Posted November 27, 2018 8 hours ago, cbjaust said: Run the render test and it will show the boost clocks. Doesn't work so well for some cards Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.