May 20, 201411 yr Crew What do you want to submit? A normal result, or to a competition? PJ , already solved, Fire Strike (not extreme) Oops is when...you upload without the ORB link in top 20 Hare Krishna Edited May 20, 201411 yr by Sweet
December 2, 201410 yr Hey, first, excuse my bad englisch, dont use it for conversation for long... Second, dont know if i'm in the right sub forum... Sry Have a little question. Have problems with cpu-z, when i try to open a second tab i allways get errors and most of the fields are blank. Tryed everything, but it's like playing lottery. With less chances... Wanna ask if its ok when i use memset for the ram informations??? With kind regards
June 12, 20159 yr Hello... i have two submition that can not edit it.... http://hwbot.org/submission/2891423_...8.11_dx9_marks http://hwbot.org/submission/2891430_...0_191174_marks the vga detected worng by program... it must change to intel HD 4400... Help Plz ...F1
June 17, 20159 yr pls fix this: http://hwbot.org/submission/2896822_flanker_cpu_frequency_fx_8320e_5628.66_mhz?recalculate=true (last FX for long time , after Godavari and G3258 playing) recalculated tweak with enter+f5 doesnt work Thx guys
October 6, 20177 yr Hi over the weekend, I submitted 4 different scores. Each of them got a gold cup for the CPU but I have been awarded no points for the submissions. the submissions fro single and multicore geekbench 4, Cinebench 2003 and PCmark10. None of them are on the beta list as far as I am aware. All the submissions sat for a number of hours without anything happening. I hit the recalculate button and it calculated the global and hardware rankings but I have not received the hardware scores for the gold cups. Could you please take a look and resolve? Thanks in advance GTBTK`s Geekbench4 - Multi Core score: 14310 points with a Core i7 4770HQ GTBTK`s Geekbench4 - Single Core score: 4307 points with a Core i7 4770HQ GTBTK`s Cinebench - 2003 score: 3090 points with a Core i7 4770HQ GTBTK`s PCMark10 score: 3400 marks with a Core i7 4770HQ
October 6, 20177 yr Hi over the weekend, I submitted 4 different scores. Each of them got a gold cup for the CPU but I have been awarded no points for the submissions.the submissions fro single and multicore geekbench 4, Cinebench 2003 and PCmark10. None of them are on the beta list as far as I am aware. All the submissions sat for a number of hours without anything happening. I hit the recalculate button and it calculated the global and hardware rankings but I have not received the hardware scores for the gold cups. Could you please take a look and resolve? Thanks in advance GTBTK`s Geekbench4 - Multi Core score: 14310 points with a Core i7 4770HQ GTBTK`s Geekbench4 - Single Core score: 4307 points with a Core i7 4770HQ GTBTK`s Cinebench - 2003 score: 3090 points with a Core i7 4770HQ GTBTK`s PCMark10 score: 3400 marks with a Core i7 4770HQ None of those benchmarks are eligible for points they'll still get you a rank and earn cups and medals if in top 5 though.
October 6, 20177 yr None of those benchmarks are eligible for points they'll still get you a rank and earn cups and medals if in top 5 though. I was aware that the beta benchmarks were not scored. Cinebench 2003 and the two geek bench versions are not beta and listed with posting rules. How can you tell the difference between point scoring Benchmarks and non point scoring ones before posting a benchmark?
October 7, 20177 yr Administrators All these benchmarks are not awarded with points at the moment as said above, this might change in the future Overclocking, overclocking, and much more! Like overclocking.
March 29, 20187 yr I would like to ask , how the moderating team of hwbot , handle cpu-z validations , where clearly the score is somehow bugged. Correct core speed Wrong core speed
March 29, 20187 yr Crew Well we can't check all cpu-z submissions for valid cpu speed, same with all other regular submissions done per day... With competitions all scores are checked, but not daily submissions. That would be a full time job,. Report if you find irregularities
March 29, 20187 yr 3 hours ago, Leeghoofd said: Well we can't check all cpu-z submissions for valid cpu speed, same with all other regular submissions done per day... With competitions all scores are checked, but not daily submissions. That would be a full time job,. Report if you find irregularities I've done that , a while ago http://hwbot.org/submission/3608861_hyperhorn_cpu_frequency_pentium_g4560_3606.82_mhz
March 29, 20187 yr Administrators May I ask why you see the score as bugged? With newer generations we have a lot of fluctuation at cpu speed reading, it can vary up to 5-10 mhz at identical bclk settings. This is annoying but also a fact which can be not even fixed by disabling spread spectrum
March 29, 20187 yr 53 minutes ago, websmile said: May I ask why you see the score as bugged? With newer generations we have a lot of fluctuation at cpu speed reading, it can vary up to 5-10 mhz at identical bclk settings. This is annoying but also a fact which can be not even fixed by disabling spread spectrum I assume because it's what stands between him and a gold.
March 29, 20187 yr I highly doubt that. Tasos is not that vain. Edited March 29, 20187 yr by Mr.Scott
March 30, 20187 yr 10 hours ago, websmile said: May I ask why you see the score as bugged? With newer generations we have a lot of fluctuation at cpu speed reading, it can vary up to 5-10 mhz at identical bclk settings. This is annoying but also a fact which can be not even fixed by disabling spread spectrum Michael It's not like other common cases of cpu speed fluctuation. For this exact score you have to recall , which is the absolute max bclk for this gen motherboards. Many can reach the 102.9 spot A few can reach a bit more , like 102.95 and even less can reach 102.98 But none (in my opinion) can overcome the 103 barrier and maintain stability to do a validation. That is the case here. delly and hyperhorn have the exact same bclk , but their core speed validations are different ... that's why i assume that hyperhorn's score is not correct. Now If hwbot tells me that , in cpu-z validations , we accept the core speed validation (as shown) ... and we do not take into consideration the bclk (or fsb) and multiplier reports ... I will accept it , and move on. Please consider , that i am not talking in general I am talking about certain cases , with known limitations.
April 21, 20196 yr dear all. my first post as novice overclocker I`m trying to avoid a new topic. my system is here https://valid.x86.fr/729f5p issue is motherboard Model CFL Freed_CFS Socket Socket 1440 FCBGA when submitting a score with xtu profile, I`m getting error with model named listed above (CFL freed cfs) according to acer official forum, my motherboard name is NB.Q3M11.002 or NB.Q3M11.004 (can't figure out 1050 layers) how can I have hwbot recognised my mobo using xtu profile ? thank you so much in advance !!! https://community.acer.com/en/discussion/comment/668707#Comment_668707
August 17, 20204 yr I have a Question, before adding About 30 scores. I have a HP Laptop with an i3 8145U and 16GB dual channel RAM. The Problem is cpuz only Posts that there are 16GB RAM but does not show the Timings. Would that be an invalid score? and if yes, is there an oppertunity to solve this Problem. Already tried single channel and different cpuz versions. I mean can I run an other Programm to list the Timings? Or is it even necessary to be valid?
August 17, 20204 yr Crew we need some sort of memtimings to be visible. what do you provide as an alternative for the mems? Aida64 or ...
August 17, 20204 yr I have testet some Programms. I found that HWinfo works best for taking screenshots. Aida takes to much space. I have a sample. Tell me if this is ok. I have another Laptop with the same issue. both are togehther about 70 Scores and about 350 Points worth, so it would matter to me. Edited August 17, 20204 yr by Sir_Nobs_of_rone_II.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.