August 6, 201014 yr that's right, is not possible cpu on 4.7ghz or +5ghz, gpu the same ? and score is total over it???
August 6, 201014 yr That's what I thought, too!!! Here is mine: http://hwbot.org/community/submission/984960_dancop_3dmark_vantage___performance_radeon_hd_5970_33160_marks
August 8, 201014 yr In this submission I am not getting the AquaMark worldrecord points. Can you fix it? http://hwbot.org/community/submission/1036957_phil_aquamark_radeon_hd_5870_456594_marks
August 9, 201014 yr Dear Administrators. I uploaded some results but are not scoring points, unlike every day the system is removing me points, could you help me?
August 10, 201014 yr Hello, dear presenters why my result is not counted? To transmit attempts already for days. The points might properly have been counted. Where does the problem lie? 3DMark 03: http://s1.directupload.net/images/user/100810/crbud32g.jpg
August 10, 201014 yr Hello, dear presenters why my result is not counted? To transmit attempts already for days. The points might properly have been counted. Where does the problem lie? 3DMark 03: http://s1.directupload.net/images/user/100810/crbud32g.jpg your scores are bugged, they have been removed
August 10, 201014 yr http://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/core_2_e4300_1.8ghz there was a guy who submitted two cheated scores: 1M - http://hwbot.org/community/submission/1037670_ 32M - http://hwbot.org/community/submission/1037940_ I asked Massman and both were removed (hence you can't see the guy if you browse 2D ranks) but my and others' scores haven't recovered points back my 1M shows and is rewarded as 3rd (even though it's 2nd), my 32M shows and is rewarded as 2nd (even though it's 1st) EDIT: 1M is fixed, 32M left to fix Edited August 10, 201014 yr by TaPaKaH
August 12, 201014 yr Hello, dear presenter's team, before short time I have tangled a profile with You. Unfortunately, I have transmitted immediately sometimes a wrong CPU-Z Validation. Hence, I ask you my 8Ghz honouring to extinguish. I ask you, however, to me an honouring for my donation to put down, because I have done this. Not a lot, but, at least, something. Thank you in prerau. mfg
August 12, 201014 yr Dear Thor941 I was upload some scores to my account but I can not add more points, even when I used new hardware is impossible to win score points, three weeks ago the same thing is happening to me. Could you help me? =( http://hwbot.org/community/user/xtreme_solid?tab=profile
August 12, 201014 yr The Problem is the "8GHz Award". I haven't really deserves because I do not have clocked as high. My second Problem is that I have no award for my donation received it.
August 12, 201014 yr The Problem is the "8GHz Award". I haven't really deserves because I do not have clocked as high. My second Problem is that I have no award for my donation received it. the award for the donation, you will receive it into 1 year, beacause the archievement is : quote : "make a donation in the PAST year". For the 8Ghz achievement there are also 10 other guys that have it and do not have any 8ghz submissions Edited August 13, 201014 yr by Christian Ney 5 -> 10
August 14, 201014 yr http://hwbot.org/community/submission/977157_david_316_pcmark_vantage_core_i5_750_11195_marks?tab=info I have reported 2 times. This result isn't pcmark vantage, it's a 3dmark vantage. See the orb compare url.
August 14, 201014 yr http://hwbot.org/community/submission/977157_david_316_pcmark_vantage_core_i5_750_11195_marks?tab=infoI have reported 2 times. This result isn't pcmark vantage, it's a 3dmark vantage. See the orb compare url. It seems has been blocked, cause it has got no ranking. Strange there is no report in the modifiacation log tab.
August 14, 201014 yr http://hwbot.org/community/submission/977157_david_316_pcmark_vantage_core_i5_750_11195_marks?tab=infoI have reported 2 times. This result isn't pcmark vantage, it's a 3dmark vantage. See the orb compare url. The problem is that your submission is ranked 10th of 10, and it should be ranked 5th of 5. Even after recalculation, it has changed nothing, has to be fixed by a moderator
September 11, 201014 yr ok.. since i didn't seem to get any response in the other thread, im going to put it here. http://hwbot.org/community/submission/1045732_johnksss_aquamark_radeon_hd_5450_ddr2_89558_marks&popup=true for the last time. this is a 5450 GDDR2 512MB card. it is not a GDDR3 1 GB card. i dont care what gpuz says. it's not reporting the card correctly. and there is a picture of the box at the bottom. along with diamond verifcation picture. and i keep moving it back to where it belongs. this is why it shows over in the GDDR3 section. all this drama over a 40 dollar card! really? are you serious? http://www.diamondmm.com/product_pri...duct=5450PE512 it says ddr2 memory! if i had a gddr3 card...i would be around 125 to 135k in aquamark...not a measly 89k
September 26, 201014 yr http://www.hwbot.org/community/submission/945051_hs_cpu_z_sempron_2600_athlon_xp_2877_mhz Not a Sempron, wrong multi. Reported the submissions in CPU-Z, and Wprime32m and 1024m, but there are no screenshots in SPI1m, SPI32m, or Pifast. All were submitted on the same day, so I assume they're all on the same wrong CPU. All should be blocked or moved. tia:)
October 1, 201014 yr got a slight problem with my i7-620M submittals. some of them are showing as 4x cpu and some are showing as 2x cpu. this is a dual core 4 thread mobile cpu. so my question is this...how do we fix it?
November 11, 201014 yr http://hwbot.org/community/submission/1002391_pipkata_3dmark06_geforce_7900_gs_7705_marks?tab=more Scores has been checked, but SM3 score is higher than SM2 and score is high for the MHz. No FPS info, so cannot tell if maybe GT1 or GT2 were low, making SM2 lower than SM3
November 13, 201014 yr Crew http://hwbot.org/community/submission/1002391_pipkata_3dmark06_geforce_7900_gs_7705_marks?tab=more Scores has been checked, but SM3 score is higher than SM2 and score is high for the MHz. No FPS info, so cannot tell if maybe GT1 or GT2 were low, making SM2 lower than SM3 I agree, I have requested a new screen with better viewing, resolution and subtest. Sw
November 16, 201014 yr I've reported this results before, but all of them was approved. All osro232's scores submitted in 6800XT (NV41) category still wrong. Normal 6800XT has 8 pixel, 4 vertex shaders ans 8 ROPs. Clocks are 400MHz for GPU and 500MHz for Mem. PCI-E 6800 cards cannot be unlocked at all, especially on NV41. But osro232's 6800XT has 12 pixel, 5 vertex shaders and 12 ROPs, clocks are 425MHz for GPU and 500MHz for Mem - all as for 6800GS card. In result we have the 20-25% advantage with the same clocks. That's why this scores cannot be submitted in 6800XT category. In addition, osro232's 6800XT has the same bios version as his 6800GS, that was benched at the same day, that look very suspicious.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.