skulstation Posted July 7, 2016 Share Posted July 7, 2016 ok thx. need to re bench Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.Scott Posted July 9, 2016 Share Posted July 9, 2016 Still cannot sub in SC4 stage 6. This site can’t be reached The webpage at Apache Tomcat/7.0.59 - Error report might be temporarily down or it may have moved permanently to a new web address. ERR_CONNECTION_ABORTED Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators websmile Posted July 9, 2016 Administrators Share Posted July 9, 2016 Will task this, obviously something is wrong as no subs were made at all so far, thx for heads up Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrBreeze Posted July 10, 2016 Share Posted July 10, 2016 Apologies if this has already been asked, but why no Pitcairn/Curaçao for SC1.5, Fire Strike Extreme? Doesn't seem fair to leave out the poor HD 7870/R9 270X, he just wants to play too... BTW comp organizers, well done, awesome stages this year! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators websmile Posted July 10, 2016 Administrators Share Posted July 10, 2016 We discussed this but did not want to extend the group of allowed cards for this too much. Keeping up with AMD codenames and rebrands is already hard enough, on some stages it was not easy to determine the limits Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
max1024 Posted July 11, 2016 Share Posted July 11, 2016 Qestion about SC:3 Legacy (DDR2) •Stage 3: Wprime 1024 - Mobile Core/NetBurst Is Penryn Core is allowed? I have a Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 "Penryn" Socket P system. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators websmile Posted July 11, 2016 Administrators Share Posted July 11, 2016 a Mobile Celeron (Northwood), Mobile Pentium 4 (Northwood), Mobile Celeron (Merom), Mobile Pentium 4 (Prescott), Mobile Pentium (Merom), Mobile Pentium (Yonah) processor The stage is limited to these cpus, because of the mass of possible candidates it was cut down to these to make things clear for benchers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.Scott Posted July 12, 2016 Share Posted July 12, 2016 Still see this every time I try to submit to SC4 stage 6 This site can’t be reached The webpage at Apache Tomcat/7.0.59 - Error report might be temporarily down or it may have moved permanently to a new web address. ERR_CONNECTION_ABORTED Yet I see other subs in that stage. WHY? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators websmile Posted July 12, 2016 Administrators Share Posted July 12, 2016 I have honestly no idea, Scotty. I made a test submission and it worked immediately without any problem, I use Firefox. Maybe try another browser or double check size of screenshots and also if you have a typo or something else that kills the fun websmile`s 3DMark 99 Max score: 5555 marks with a GeForce FX 5200 Ultra P.S. Will delete sub this evening Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ksateaaa23 Posted July 12, 2016 Share Posted July 12, 2016 ksateaaa23`s 3DMark 99 Max score: 10140 marks with a GeForce FX 5500 PCI 128bit i could submit for the same stage. no problems for me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StingerYar Posted July 12, 2016 Share Posted July 12, 2016 SC4: Vintage - Stage 2 (Aquamark) Only use processors from the 350,346,160,347 family What are these families? These looks more like Celeron D series, but from LGA775. So what specific s478-processors allowed, or all of them allowed? Thanks for attention. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators websmile Posted July 12, 2016 Administrators Share Posted July 12, 2016 Netburst 478 like in stage 1 - I guess I posted this before, but it will be hard to find after 22 pages, so we need a fix urgent @Massman Related Netburst CPUs for socket 478 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marquzz Posted July 12, 2016 Share Posted July 12, 2016 (edited) a Mobile Celeron (Northwood), Mobile Pentium 4 (Northwood), Mobile Celeron (Merom), Mobile Pentium 4 (Prescott), Mobile Pentium (Merom), Mobile Pentium (Yonah) processorThe stage is limited to these cpus, because of the mass of possible candidates it was cut down to these to make things clear for benchers Hm, does any of these even support DDR2? Edit: I guess Merom and Yonah does, but the rest? Edited July 12, 2016 by Marquzz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators websmile Posted July 12, 2016 Administrators Share Posted July 12, 2016 SC4 is ddr1 stage.... please do not raise idea to use ddr2 on this^^ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marquzz Posted July 12, 2016 Share Posted July 12, 2016 SC4 is ddr1 stage.... please do not raise idea to use ddr2 on this^^ I don't know who you answered, but my post above is regarding SC3 stage 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Leeghoofd Posted July 12, 2016 Crew Share Posted July 12, 2016 (edited) Anyone else having locking issues with cpuz and Socket A cpus... I can run the benchmark, but during validation cpu-z always locks at 15%... even at stock clocks lol Edited July 12, 2016 by Leeghoofd Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators websmile Posted July 12, 2016 Administrators Share Posted July 12, 2016 (edited) Sorry, was a bit distracted - there are Prescott results with ddr2, I think I saw Northwood as well. Might be a good idea to do some research @Albrecht try to disable some functions at cpuz ini, set values to 0 instead of 1, might be dmi or another check that makes it freeze Edited July 12, 2016 by websmile Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.Scott Posted July 12, 2016 Share Posted July 12, 2016 I have honestly no idea, Scotty. I made a test submission and it worked immediately without any problem, I use Firefox. Maybe try another browser or double check size of screenshots and also if you have a typo or something else that kills the funwebsmile`s 3DMark 99 Max score: 5555 marks with a GeForce FX 5200 Ultra P.S. Will delete sub this evening Wound up being a browser issue. Works fine in Firefox. I was using Chrome before. Funny though, I have subbed in other stages without having to change from Chrome. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I.nfraR.ed Posted July 14, 2016 Share Posted July 14, 2016 (edited) Sadly no, this is what hurts me personally a bit, but no exceptions. For all stages no server hardware, only exception is Skulltrail because it was a desktop gaming concept that Intel branded this way despite socket 771 used To me this is wrong in the part for socket 939 Opterons. These are desktop CPUs. For server you would need s.940. If I remember correctly certain dual-cpu s.939 boards with nF4 chipset exist, which support Athlon64/Sempron CPUs, so going by this logic you should ban them too. As long as a s.939 Opteron is used, I don't see a problem. Why allow Skulltrail, but no s.939 Opterons that are basically the same as their Athlon64 counterparts. Can you elaborate on the subject why these specific Opterons are not allowed. Maybe there's something I don't know or missed in the discussion. PS: And sorry if I ask the same question, but did not find an answer by searching the thread. I know we (participants) are annoying at times . Edited July 14, 2016 by I.nfraR.ed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators websmile Posted July 14, 2016 Administrators Share Posted July 14, 2016 All Opterons are server cpus, no matter which socket, as well as xeons are server. If we allow 939 opertons, people will say this is not fair unless you allow xeon 3110 and 3210 and so on... The decision is a general one, we decided to disallow server parts to rule out expensive, rare parts to appear at certain stages, every exception would only cause trouble and confuse people what to use or not Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aleslammer Posted July 15, 2016 Share Posted July 15, 2016 I have two Asus boards that I was thinking of using, a P35 & P55 that have workstation in the name so can they be used for Team Cup? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators websmile Posted July 15, 2016 Administrators Share Posted July 15, 2016 Yes, we are not riding on principles, these are standard 1156 and 775 boards and give no advantage nor are they rare or super-expensive even when they were released Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aleslammer Posted July 15, 2016 Share Posted July 15, 2016 I would of said thank you for a no just looking for clarification! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr.paco Posted July 15, 2016 Share Posted July 15, 2016 I've been trying to get this XTU submission into the comp but for what ever reason when I click Participate nothing happens. Tried with Chrome & IE. MrPaco`s XTU score: 489 marks with a Core i5 2400S Could you please add it to SC-2/Stage-1 Thank you Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.Scott Posted July 15, 2016 Share Posted July 15, 2016 Try Firefox Frank. I had issues too and that seemed to work. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.