MaddMutt Posted August 17, 2019 Posted August 17, 2019 I've nailed down the problem to having to run a Older NVidia driver with a Older NVidia card in Windows 7. I have sent you a bug report so that you can replicate the error. I hope you have a GTX-580 or older card for testing Quote
asmodee Posted August 18, 2019 Posted August 18, 2019 Hello, I get this message when using the software. Do you have any idea. Thank you. Quote
_mat_ Posted August 18, 2019 Posted August 18, 2019 From what I can gather from the screen, the service executable might be missing. Please have a look at your BenchMate installation path and see if service32.exe is available in the bin subdirectory. You can also close the application and submit a bug report by starting bugreport.exe. Quote
MaddMutt Posted August 23, 2019 Posted August 23, 2019 I'm not sure if this is the correct thread or not. This is really about GPUPI 3.2 and GPUPI 3.3.2. I use the bench to give me a quick GPU core and memory OC. I upgraded HWINFO to latest version which 3.2 does not support. Version 3.2 is also the current one to give points OKAY HERE is my PROBLEM -> I have a GTX-980 KPE and a GTX-980Ti KPE that are in mint condition. When I bench either version of GPUPI, it does not make my memory run @ set speed. Both Video cards have the memory @ 1753 default speed. The GTX-980 runs the bench with the memory @ 1500 and the GTX-980Ti @ 1653. I can set my memory to xxxx but GPUPI still runs it at the slower speed. I hope this is a problem with the program and not my cards. Thank You For Your Time ? Quote
Members GeorgeStorm Posted August 23, 2019 Members Posted August 23, 2019 I believe there's basically no load on the mem so they don't clock to full speed? Quote
bigblock990 Posted August 23, 2019 Posted August 23, 2019 35 minutes ago, MaddMutt said: I'm not sure if this is the correct thread or not. This is really about GPUPI 3.2 and GPUPI 3.3.2. I use the bench to give me a quick GPU core and memory OC. I upgraded HWINFO to latest version which 3.2 does not support. Version 3.2 is also the current one to give points OKAY HERE is my PROBLEM -> I have a GTX-980 KPE and a GTX-980Ti KPE that are in mint condition. When I bench either version of GPUPI, it does not make my memory run @ set speed. Both Video cards have the memory @ 1753 default speed. The GTX-980 runs the bench with the memory @ 1500 and the GTX-980Ti @ 1653. I can set my memory to xxxx but GPUPI still runs it at the slower speed. I hope this is a problem with the program and not my cards. Thank You For Your Time ? This is not gpupi problem, its nvidia driver "feature". Cuda is compute so the driver sets p2 instead of p0, which results in full core clocks but lower mem clocks. 1 Quote
_mat_ Posted August 23, 2019 Posted August 23, 2019 3 hours ago, bigblock990 said: This is not gpupi problem, its nvidia driver "feature". Cuda is compute so the driver sets p2 instead of p0, which results in full core clocks but lower mem clocks. Exactly. There is also a GPUPI support thread, which would have been a better place to ask this. You're sadly not using BenchMate judging by your screen. 1 Quote
Fasttrack Posted August 23, 2019 Posted August 23, 2019 Windows 10, latest, HPET enabled. Any possible explanation please ? Thank you. Quote
Mr.Scott Posted August 23, 2019 Posted August 23, 2019 Need to disable driver signature enforcement. 1 1 Quote
Fasttrack Posted August 24, 2019 Posted August 24, 2019 1 hour ago, Mr.Scott said: Need to disable driver signature enforcement. Thanks Scotty All good. Appreciate the help. 1 Quote
_mat_ Posted September 2, 2019 Posted September 2, 2019 (edited) BenchMate 0.9 is here! After six weeks of (absolutely necessary) legwork I'm finally releasing the next major version of my Benchmark Verfication Software. All reported bugs have been fixed, a good part of the benchmark integration rewritten. I also put more effort into supporting Windows 7 and have extensively tested it on multiple platforms. If you like where this is going, spread the word and bench your stuff with BenchMate whenever possible. This is the most secure, reliable and trustworthy option to present your overclocking achievements. ? Download | Change Log | Donate Edited September 2, 2019 by _mat_ 6 1 Quote
_mat_ Posted September 3, 2019 Posted September 3, 2019 (edited) BenchMate 0.9.1 is already here! It adds support for Geekbench 5 and the Big Package bundles it. For more details have check the GB5 thread: Download | Change Log | Donate Edited September 3, 2019 by _mat_ 1 1 Quote
Crew Leeghoofd Posted September 3, 2019 Author Crew Posted September 3, 2019 Will make a front page post and add the donation links tonite Matt 1 Quote
_mat_ Posted September 3, 2019 Posted September 3, 2019 New update: BenchMate 0.9.2 Last one for today, I promise. Download | Change Log | Donate With the help of @Bilko I've found a bug on Ryzen and Geekbench 5. Read more about it here: 2 Quote
ajc9988 Posted September 3, 2019 Posted September 3, 2019 So I'm still getting a timer skew on Win 10 Ent with my 1950X. Has anyone else seen this issue with their first gen ryzen chips, Zen+, or second gen? I tried both BCDedit /set useplatformclock true and false, no effect. After I went to 0.9.2, I stopped getting the popup about the timer skew, but it still failed and gave no score. I tried the standalone installer of it to the same result. Worked fine on Win 7, but that heavily gimps scores compared to Win 10 (like 35-40% lower multi-core score). https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/20741 This is compared to someone who got this score with a 1950X on a Zenith Extreme with Win 10 Pro: https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/2785 Any help figuring out why I'm getting this issue would be nice, along with if anyone else with any generation Ryzen on Windows 10. Best regards, AJC Quote
keeph8n Posted September 3, 2019 Posted September 3, 2019 Run multiple 2000 series TR4 chips with no issues using BenchMate. Haven’t tried newest version as of yet, but will this week 1 Quote
ajc9988 Posted September 3, 2019 Posted September 3, 2019 5 minutes ago, keeph8n said: Run multiple 2000 series TR4 chips with no issues using BenchMate. Haven’t tried newest version as of yet, but will this week Please check out the behavior BEFORE activating GB5 in the new benchmate. So far, it was primarily GB5 that said something about the timer skew. After the notifications stopped popping up about the timer skew on GB5 (after I had installed the stand alone), it did show a timer skew one time in benchmate. Rest of the scores come up fine, except the program never pops open the browser to upload the results (which may be because the program is still reading some form of timer error). I haven't fully run down what is going on yet, but have posted here and at GB about it. But I'd like to rule out it being just my rig by having others play with it related to Ryzen. Thank you! Quote
keeph8n Posted September 3, 2019 Posted September 3, 2019 Will do. Apologies that it will take a few days before I can get this done. Quote
_mat_ Posted September 3, 2019 Posted September 3, 2019 1 hour ago, ajc9988 said: Please check out the behavior BEFORE activating GB5 in the new benchmate. So far, it was primarily GB5 that said something about the timer skew. After the notifications stopped popping up about the timer skew on GB5 (after I had installed the stand alone), it did show a timer skew one time in benchmate. Rest of the scores come up fine, except the program never pops open the browser to upload the results (which may be because the program is still reading some form of timer error). I haven't fully run down what is going on yet, but have posted here and at GB about it. But I'd like to rule out it being just my rig by having others play with it related to Ryzen. Thank you! BenchMate 0.9.2 should fix any timer errors. If they still occur, please file a bug report with the screenshot showing the run dialog of GB and the error dialog. If something else is not working as expected with BenchMate, but working WITHOUT it, please file a bug report within BenchMate right after the run fails and I will have a look at it. 1 Quote
ajc9988 Posted September 3, 2019 Posted September 3, 2019 13 minutes ago, _mat_ said: BenchMate 0.9.2 should fix any timer errors. If they still occur, please file a bug report with the screenshot showing the run dialog of GB and the error dialog. If something else is not working as expected with BenchMate, but working WITHOUT it, please file a bug report within BenchMate right after the run fails and I will have a look at it. Turns out the mods I have for my work desktop Win 10 Ent, or some software that I use on it, was the issue. Once I put it on my bench thumbdrive, no problems whatever on it or any of the other benchmarks. Considering I primarily use the bench drive to bench on, it is all good now. I just was honestly expecting GB5 to work on my work modded desktop, but guess it is a different set of mods, slightly. Once again, thank you for all the work you have done! 1 Quote
_mat_ Posted September 13, 2019 Posted September 13, 2019 (edited) I'm currently working on the integration of pifast into BenchMate. This poses a new challenge because pifast is a command line tool called with a batch file. It's hard to secure but also not very user-friendly or presentable. So I've built a wrapper this week that allows integration of all command line benchmarks. Sneak a peek of the first screenshot: Edited September 13, 2019 by _mat_ 2 3 Quote
keeph8n Posted September 13, 2019 Posted September 13, 2019 (edited) absolutely FANTASTIC. Thank you @_mat_ Edited September 13, 2019 by keeph8n spelling Quote
Guest 0.0 Posted September 14, 2019 Posted September 14, 2019 Sent a bug report for 0.93 but... Have them zipped if you need them. Tried some Benchmate SPi with i5-2410M and the results are really good, especially as it was run with a lot of cut processes on a dual core that depends on only one core being active to achieve highest turbo. Also thanks for the backend tip. I was able to test GB5 using previously mentioned clock problem without having to send bogus results online. GB3,4 and 5 appear vulnerable without Benchmate but perhaps the online validation would come to the rescue? First one is normal run with quite a lot of background processes, second one skewed. Also tried FireStrike with latest sysinfo 5.21 Normally would expect less than 10k. Again maybe the actual online validation would fail but already too many bogus results uploaded. Particularly annoying are those results that are obviously boosted by a second GPU that although listed in the details is still reported as a single GPU result. Benchmate nicely picks up these skewed results which otherwise might make it into the listings. Good work Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.