Crew Leeghoofd Posted January 18, 2020 Crew Share Posted January 18, 2020 K all, probably early days as we are aiming to host this one around mid June or such, but maybe not bad to take an early start on what the community wants to see regarding stages or benchmarks. We already had some great ideas at Keeph8ans Discord channel, but to keep track of stuff, better start a thread here 3dmark06: DDR: socket 939 limitation DDR2: 2 processor cores and 2 GPU cores (GPU core G80-92) DDR3: 3 processor cores and 3 GPU cores DDR4: 4 processor cores and 4 GPU cores (nVIDIA only) 3dmark99: DDR: AMD CPU and AGP4x/8x DDR2: 2 processor cores, GF 106-116(') cores, Mobos based on nForce chipset DDR3: LGA775 4 cores, 1 video core Unigine Basic: DDR: Socket A platform and nVidia videocard DDR2: 1 CPU core and 2 GPUs in SLI/crossfire DDR3: 2 CPU cores, Geforce 400 family DDR4: AMD APUs only 3DMark03: DDR: socket 478, AGP4x/8x DDR2: 1 CPU core, ATI HD 4000 family DDR3: 6 core CPUs, Geforce 500 family DDR4: CGN 5tgh gen (Vega) 3DMash-up: DDR: Aquamark3: Geforce2 family DDR2: Vantage (GPU score) : ATI HD 2000 DDR3: FireStrike (GPU score) : Intel IGP DDR4: Unigine SuperPosition 8K X265 1080P: DDR: Socket 478 DDR2: Conroe& Woodcrest 4M cpus DDR3: 4cores LGA 1366 DDR4: AM4 only MemFreq: DDR: no socket 939 -- 1024Mb -- Cas 3 DDR2: no socket 771-775 -- 2048Mb -- Cas 5 DDR3: AM3/AM3+ -- 8192Mb -- Cas 10 DDR4: 16348Mb -- Cas 15 SuperPi 32M: DDR: Socket 754 -- 8 multi max DDR2: Quad cores -- 8 multi max DDR3: Zambezi core -- 10 multi max (benchmate) DDR4: no LGA 1200 -- 12 multi max (benchmate) Cinebench 2003: (notebooks & notebook parts only, no desktop CPUs!! GPUPI 3.2 for CPU: DDR: 100M DDR2: 100M -- Allendale 2M DDR3: 1B -- AMD DDR4: 1B Wprime 1024: DDR: Duron processors DDR2: AM2 processors DDR3: Clarkdale processors DDR4: AM4 (benchmate) Ofcourse we can't plz everybody and might rule out too exotic or super expensive (server) hardware https://hwbot.org/competition/team_cup_2020 Let's brainstorm!! 2 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mythical tech Posted January 18, 2020 Share Posted January 18, 2020 (edited) X265 4k on an old platform like 939/775 Or per core 4k/1080p Edited January 18, 2020 by Mythical tech Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keeph8n Posted January 18, 2020 Share Posted January 18, 2020 ES Hardwarezzzzzzzz GPUPi 32B four way Hawaii based. Lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Don_Dan Posted January 18, 2020 Crew Share Posted January 18, 2020 My ideas for last year's Team Cup that didn't make it in the competition: DDR: Maximum memory frequency with 2x1GB (but we had max memory frequency already last year, so not sure about this one) DDR2: some multithreaded benchmark on Pentium D (Smithfield and Presler) 3DMark 03 with GeForce 7x00 (and Wolfdale or Conroe core?) DDR3: 32M on Clarkdale Max BCLK on LGA1366 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ground Posted January 18, 2020 Share Posted January 18, 2020 Bring back the memory frequency stage, but with a twist - optimal Socket not allowed. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noxinite Posted January 18, 2020 Share Posted January 18, 2020 Haswell 5GHz 32M LCC... with a twist: it's using Benchmate to stop cheating. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Leeghoofd Posted January 18, 2020 Author Crew Share Posted January 18, 2020 so I assume it's okay to keep the DDR 1-2-3-4 formula 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unityofsaints Posted January 18, 2020 Share Posted January 18, 2020 2 hours ago, ground1556 said: Bring back the memory frequency stage, but with a twist - optimal Socket not allowed. What's the optimal socket for DDR4? ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TAGG Posted January 18, 2020 Share Posted January 18, 2020 (edited) 2 hours ago, Leeghoofd said: so I assume it's okay to keep the DDR 1-2-3-4 formula Oh hell yeah Allso please do something with original Phenom(prefferably multicore, maybe something like 1,2,3,4 cores (am2(+) cpus only, ddr2 stage ofc), would techically only need original phenom in 3 core slot), i know they are boring, but pretty sure they get forgotten in every single competition, either it's a64 x2 or ph 2 Edited January 18, 2020 by TAGG 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yosarianilives Posted January 18, 2020 Share Posted January 18, 2020 2 hours ago, Leeghoofd said: so I assume it's okay to keep the DDR 1-2-3-4 formula I like this idea, could we also add a section for misc benches? So we could things like a classic "ddr1-2-3-4 mem frequency" or a dog pile stage with no mem restrictions either on something relatively easy to run on slightly older hw or for a dx9 3d bench. Basically any stage that wouldn't fit into a single mem type well would go into misc category. Also would be good as I think more than one dog pile stage overall is probably too much. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ground Posted January 18, 2020 Share Posted January 18, 2020 31 minutes ago, unityofsaints said: What's the optimal socket for DDR4? ? whatever holds the record at the start of the comp I guess. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yosarianilives Posted January 18, 2020 Share Posted January 18, 2020 17 minutes ago, TAGG said: Oh hell yeah Allso please do something with original Phenom(prefferably multicore, maybe something like 1,2,3,4 cores (am2(+) cpus only, ddr2 stage ofc), would techically only need original phenom in 3 core slot), i know they are boring, but pretty sure they get forgotten in every single competition, either it's a64 x2 or ph 2 Or for a bunch of fun just say am2+ and see people hunt down the few deneb chips while still getting a mainly 1st gen phenom stage. Could be a nice continuation of the "am3 no thuban" cinebench stage from two years ago. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yosarianilives Posted January 18, 2020 Share Posted January 18, 2020 (edited) 4 minutes ago, ground1556 said: whatever holds the record at the start of the comp I guess. I mean how hard would it be to just say no 1151, no 3rd gen ryzen? So total stack would be like no 939, 775, 1150, 1152, or 3rd gen ryzen. Still pretty simple and allows for decent scores but no wr/gfp Edited January 18, 2020 by yosarianilives Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TAGG Posted January 18, 2020 Share Posted January 18, 2020 Just now, yosarianilives said: Or for a bunch of fun just say am2+ and see people hunt down the few deneb chips while still getting a mainly 1st gen phenom stage. Could be a nice continuation of the "am3 no thuban" cinebench stage from two years ago. The point of 1,2,3,4 core am2(+) is that you can bench one of the 2 denebs, but still have to bench 3 diffrent architectures to get ideal score 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yosarianilives Posted January 18, 2020 Share Posted January 18, 2020 I like it, just open ended to allow a ton of different hw while also basically specifying we see what we normally don't. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TAGG Posted January 18, 2020 Share Posted January 18, 2020 10 minutes ago, TAGG said: The point of 1,2,3,4 core am2(+) is that you can bench one of the 2 denebs, but still have to bench 3 diffrent architectures to get ideal score Ok, idea doesn't work unless we don't allow unlocking, cause then it'd be only singlecore + denebs again... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yosarianilives Posted January 18, 2020 Share Posted January 18, 2020 1 hour ago, TAGG said: Ok, idea doesn't work unless we don't allow unlocking, cause then it'd be only singlecore + denebs again... Is there more than 1 dual core deneb on the socket? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TAGG Posted January 19, 2020 Share Posted January 19, 2020 6 minutes ago, yosarianilives said: Is there more than 1 dual core deneb on the socket? Yep 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yosarianilives Posted January 19, 2020 Share Posted January 19, 2020 Tbh it'd probably be fine, there was a am3 cinebench stage with no thuban allowed, and the team I was on was the only one to show up with all 6 core cpus. So we'd still see plenty of 1st gen phenoms Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigblock990 Posted January 19, 2020 Share Posted January 19, 2020 5 hours ago, Leeghoofd said: so I assume it's okay to keep the DDR 1-2-3-4 formula Yes I'd like to see a no limit mem freq stage for each gen. Maybe see some records broken like @Noxinite taking down DDR2 in TC17 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noxinite Posted January 19, 2020 Share Posted January 19, 2020 7 hours ago, bigblock990 said: Yes I'd like to see a no limit mem freq stage for each gen. Maybe see some records broken like @Noxinite taking down DDR2 in TC17 Tbf the DDR# freq stages are always very fun, and I haven't touched my DDR2 really since then. XD 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FUGGER Posted January 19, 2020 Share Posted January 19, 2020 (edited) ES only stage Non intel/AMD super pi stage Fastest storage stage Oldest CPU to run CPUID stage Windows 95 solitaire card drop time stage Edited January 19, 2020 by FUGGER 2 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yosarianilives Posted January 19, 2020 Share Posted January 19, 2020 51 minutes ago, FUGGER said: Non intel/AMD super pi stage Memory restrictions? I can try to get a zhiaxin or whatever the Chinese ryzen cpu is lol 52 minutes ago, FUGGER said: Fastest storage stage Hmm I like this one, although it gets expensive fast and and hwbot doesn't really have a storage bench worth using plus the whole sata 850 Evo "driver" issue... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Obijuan83 Posted January 19, 2020 Share Posted January 19, 2020 939 Αthlon 64 Single core HWBOT x265 Benchmark 4k 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yosarianilives Posted January 19, 2020 Share Posted January 19, 2020 16 minutes ago, Obijuan83 said: 939 Αthlon 64 Single core HWBOT x265 Benchmark 4k Maybe bump it down to 1080p? That should take long enough on k8 1c plus it won't need as much ram Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.