How can I see there is a duplicate in the DB when I am editing the score? I've edited tens of scores without this problem...

Ok, usefull info

Thank's both, jmke and Mostru.

 

Sorry for missing link:o

 

Sw

Same guy or team, 8600 GT DDR3 in 8600GT DDR2, now in 3DMark'05

 

(problem in forum PCAXE ???)

 

Link:

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=861191

 

Thx

 

Sw

Fixed

@Sweet: Maybe problem with bot, I can't see the score posted on forum in thread picked by bot.

http://www.pcaxe.com/forum/showthread.php?t=259

 

But I see that this score 14745 is linked with his older score with 14746 points which is strange.

An on http://www.hwbot.org/listResults.do?userId=17997&applicationId=5 I cannot see that he have 14745 core, but 14746 that is fixed before.

 

@HWbot stuff:

If I delete his scores from our forum does the scanned score from bot stays on HWbot, or the score dissapear?

Maybe this can solve problem with his scores and wrong bot picking score, if score picked by bot can be deleted from forum and stay in HWbot database.

Or can you tell me what he should write in description field to recognize card like 8600GT 256 DDR3?

Edited June 7, 200916 yr by Ivan1981

@Sweet: Maybe problem with bot, I can't see the score posted on forum in thread picked by bot.

http://www.pcaxe.com/forum/showthread.php?t=25

 

I'ts Ok.

 

Imagine that the problem was

 

Sw

@Sweet: Maybe problem with bot, I can't see the score posted on forum in thread picked by bot.

http://www.pcaxe.com/forum/showthread.php?t=259

 

But I see that this score 14745 is linked with his older score with 14746 points which is strange.

An on http://www.hwbot.org/listResults.do?userId=17997&applicationId=5 I cannot see that he have 14745 core, but 14746 that is fixed before.

 

@HWbot stuff:

If I delete his scores from our forum does the scanned score from bot stays on HWbot, or the score dissapear?

Maybe this can solve problem with his scores and wrong bot picking score, if score picked by bot can be deleted from forum and stay in HWbot database.

Or can you tell me what he should write in description field to recognize card like 8600GT 256 DDR3?

 

Fixed

 

Again In 3DMark'05 , same case as before. bot problem.

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=861884

 

Please move to correct category

 

Regards

Edited June 9, 200916 yr by Sweet

Ok, I´ve got some results which were already moderated, but still don`t fit 100%.

 

The first score is from one of my team mates:

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=753325

 

He told me the CPU-Z-detection is wrong. Because of the "heavy overlocking" CPU-Z can`t detect the L2 cache properly and the Pentium 266 MHz turns into a Celeron. I`m not an advanced oldschool expert, but I know that oldschool hardware leads to problems with CPU-Z sometimes. Because of the fact that

- he did tell the same for OC-lists at our forum (so it`s about integrity, not hwbot-specific)

and

- he would even loose 0.1 or 0.2 points in CPU-Z-category

I ask you to move the result into this category: http://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/Pentium%202%20266Mhz%20(Deschutes)

 

Now I`ve got some old scores which were moved several times before the right category was created by Turrican (Thx )a few weeks ago.

So I ask you to move these results:

01: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=735565

03: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=735567

05: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=735568

AM3: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=735570

into Radeon X1550 256mb RV515 64 Bit category: http://www.hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/Radeon%20X1550%20256mb%20RV%20515%2064%20bit

 

(My 06 score is already there)

 

Thank you so much in advance.

Please move these results here http://www.hwbot.org/hardware/processor/Pentium%203%20800Mhz .

That's two Pentium III 800EB (133MHz FSB) in Pentium III 800E (100MHz FSB) category

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=862835

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=840029

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=862917

 

error in computation

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=860458

 

SLI in non SLI category, cant report because its checked by moderator...

Hi, I updated and fixed my results, I had some typos.

 

Please unlock my Profile: Jor3llBR/Elano and update scores.

 

Thanks///

I still don't have my points in and when I click profile I also only get this:

 

"Not Found

 

The requested URL /community/user/Jor3llBR/Elano was not found on this server.

Apache/2.2.4 (Ubuntu) DAV/2 SVN/1.4.4 mod_jk/1.2.23 PHP/5.2.3-1ubuntu6.4 Server at hwbot.org Port 80"

Hi,

This score is wrong>

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=800317

 

The result in the screenshot shows a Wprime 1024 score of 1590,028 seconds which = about 26 minutes and 30 seconds.

The info he has added for the result shows 25 minutes and 9 seconds which is clearly wrong.

The score needs adjusting to the correct value

Thanx

Please, move this result (cyrix MII in 6x86MX-category)

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=710181

here:

http://www.hwbot.org/hardware/processor/Cyrix%20M%20II-266GP

 

And you can also move there these results:

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=710180

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=710176

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=710177

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=866327

The result is ranked as a 3D06 X850Pro Score, even the futuremark online Browswe shows it´s an X850XT- look at the SM2 score and compare it to the no1 result, wouild be 30% more with 30% less frequency;) and an X2 socket 939

Best regards

Looks like a bugged run...

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=867294

 

Even has the driver error message in the corner.

Looks like a bugged run...

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=867294

 

Even has the driver error message in the corner.

 

My mistake.

What "bugged run" means.

 

I deleted the entry.

I'm ok now?

Edited June 22, 200915 yr by micul

My mistake.

What "bugged run" means.

 

I deleted the entry.

I'm ok now?

 

You had a driver problem and in Win7 scores got really high on a low clocking cpu and gpu.

Have a look at the other scores that you beat and you'll notice that it would not be possible on those clocks.

 

All is ok mate

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=632592

 

Based on the CPU used and the MHz, comparing the run to the results behind it, this *might* be an SLI result?

 

Either that or everyone else has completely misinterpreted where the GPU bottleneck kicks in and all their extra CPU power is going to waste

Yea he kind of just walks of the graph LOL!

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=849451

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=863329

 

RS690 is an AM2 mobo... can't really be this core. Ask him for a CPUZ validation of his 5000+ Toledo

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=860474

 

GT2 is way over the top. It's either a bugged run or a result of some illegal tweak. There's more of such results in HD4850 category, and some in other GPU's.

 

EDIT: I see it has been deleted, good job now I have my cup back

Edited June 28, 200915 yr by xoqolatl

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=871247

 

3 card in the single card category

link to fourm post confirms it