Jump to content

Submission & member moderation

Discussion on how results should be monitored, discuss doubtfull results, ...

  1. Started by Ace123,

    The link result is not possible with a 16C CPU at the reported GHZ. I believe this is a bugged run. The result would put it in 3rd place for an 18C cpu with two more cores, 4 more threads. This isn't possible. https://hwbot.org/submission/4209331_mllrkllr88_geekbench4___multi_core_core_i9_9960x_82217_points

  2. the calculation of global points is incorrect in many submissions

  3. Guest Ximi
    Started by Guest Ximi,

    I leave old Team , because I change Team , request calculate points. Thanks to moderation !!?

    • 9 replies
    • 1.2k views
  4. Guest
    Started by Guest,

    The recent banter I swapped with ADVenturePO member was very funny. Dude has never been on my radar before though. He perhaps considers himself a worthy adversary of Enthusiasts page1. https://hwbot.org/career/enthusiast?offset=-1 https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/adversary _____________ Lets examine that shall we. https://hwbot.org/user/nata_58/#Points The #1 enthusiast enjoys his ranking with some nice highest 20 & 30 point scores. Sounds fair right? A nice score I consider a job well done is 20 points earned. _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________…

  5. Hello OCers and moderators. @Leeghoofd @Massman @richba5tard Something is terribly wrong with GPUPI scores. Those submissions https://hwbot.org/submission/3991289_x_computers.eu_gpupi___1b_4_geforce_rtx_2080_ti_0sec_639ms/ https://hwbot.org/submission/4143713_pijonson_gpupi_v3.3___1b_4_geforce_rtx_2080_ti_0sec_549ms/ are marked as for 4 GPUs - and their not. And another problem is with points - I'm not getting any for my GPUPI 1B submissions. Why? There's an error when recalculating. Competing with 8-10 cards against 4 is somehow not great score. It's cheating. https://hwbot.org/submission/3540678_ This submission also violates cards a…

  6. So beyond the obvious the ryzen results are flowing in and disable points check box is not working for some people. Beyond this fact, submissions that have points disabled are still affecting the rankings. Every result that is below the submission itself is getting points for one rank less. Pretty sure its not supposed to work this way or am I wrong? If it is the way its supposed to work you may as well just give the subs points because they are impacting the current rankings. (yes im an intel shill blah blah just want to clear up the rules thx)

  7. Started by NATA 58,

    Rico~Suabe`: reported by user due to possible cheat (He is just running 1 game test - Game Test is set at 1 of 7) https://hwbot.org/moderator/reported

      • Haha
    • 3 replies
    • 818 views
  8. Started by TASOS,

    @liqmet PLEASE Stop reporting results with no obvious reason Especially the old and very old results. The majority of old results from 2006,2007,2008,2009 ... have been checked by moderators. Just an example. You cant report such a result for missing photo or non-working links. Read the rules and use common sense. Use the report button wisely Thank you

  9. Started by Omega-man,

    Hello everyone. Very interesting submission indeed http://hwbot.org/submission/2224197_michu_superpi___1m_am486dx2_66_55min_46sec_952ms Is it normal that DX4 cpu persist in DX2-submission? As i know am486dx2-66 can't run on 3x multiplier, it's hardwired on 2x without any chance to change.

    • 5 replies
    • 1.2k views
  10. Started by kill4l,

    hello everyone, kindly check this result, https://hwbot.org/submission/4161618_jase321_xtu_core_i7_8750h_2177_marks/ it's listed under i7 8750h CPU, but if we check the xtu hardware tab we see it's for i7 9750h ... please correct this submission .

      • Thanks
    • 2 replies
    • 743 views
  11. Started by techjesse,

    No Global Points added... really! Who do I have to contact to fix this? I have made many sub and earned Global and hardware points without them added to my profile. What do I have to do? ChangeTeams, Donate to fund, contribute hardware? I have been submitting benches here for 8 years and we use to have a button to recalculate all our scores, it's gone! We need it back! I spend a lot of time, effort and money to do what I love to do, I am an Extreme enthusiastic super geek! And I should receive every POINT I earn! Who do I contact to make this happen?

    • 10 replies
    • 769 views
  12. Started by R0gue,

    Hi, I'm R0gue When i go to post a comment on a submitted score, (my most recent on Kingpins near 60K Firestrike) it shows me as a different user. The users link even goes to their profile. My comments appear as coylpittman, any ideas on how to show it as me posting the comments i am leaving?

    • 0 replies
    • 762 views
  13. I'm not sure if this is the correct place to post this. It's seems like a bug to me. Anyway. I've submitted several scores for a kit of Crucial Ballistix Sport DDR3 that I just got a couple days ago. None of the scores are being listed in the Crucial Ballistix Sport rankings. I've never had this problem with any other hardware. What gives? The scores in question: https://hwbot.org/submission/4106699 https://hwbot.org/submission/4106706 https://hwbot.org/submission/4107162 https://hwbot.org/submission/4107159 As you can see, those are very high scores for that particular hardware. I'd like them to be acknowledged as such. That's all. Side…

  14. Started by Gumanoid,

    Hi, Yesterday I submitted the superpi 1m score https://hwbot.org/submission/4105333_ but it not ranked yet. what's wrong? All another submissions ranked after a couple of seconds.

  15. Hi, I recently did a search for the oldest SP32M hardware golds. One that came up was OnePageBook's X6800 run. Great, I thought, let's try to beat a 12 year old record. When I researched it a little more, I came across this newspost. This brought up a couple of questions in my mind: i If OPB was a notorious cheater, is his 32M run also cheated and therefore possibly unbeatable? In general, should members banned for life because of cheating have all their results purged? I am not sure about 2). On the one hand it's very time-consuming to analyse potentially hundreds of submissions to check whether they are cheated, on the other hand you run the ri…

      • Haha
      • Like
      • Thanks
    • 5 replies
    • 1.1k views
  16. one of my older submisions for a gpu pie run was reported for "memory tab missing" when verry clearly in the center i have my main system memory speed tab shown. https://hwbot.org/submission/2913419_griffin505_gpupi___32b_geforce_gtx_980_33min_38sec_294ms run if oyu cant see that post , then i will provide the picture i have for my memory speeds ect.

  17. "redux" has reported my sub for the second time. first time he has reported and i have explained him. no moderator attended to it. now he reported again. this is bizarre. generally, i use windows in balanced mode with Amd Cool n Quiet on(power saving feature). so you will see only the lowest multi and not actual multi in the screenshot.(although you can see the range of multi in cpu-z) without understanding this. if the rookies start to report repeatedly, it looks odd. some action should be taken against him. how about removing the option for rookies to report subs.......probably in due course of time they will understand what is what. then may be allow in futur…

      • Like
      • Thanks
    • 17 replies
    • 1.1k views
  18. Started by flanker,

    Hi guys, yesterday I got 44.1 points for DDR4 memory freq score. https://hwbot.org/submission/4084834_flanker_memory_frequency_ddr4_sdram_2344.9_mhz But in my personal profile I have still old points. And on my wall are not added ? (last one points update is from 3.2.2019 ???!!!) https://hwbot.org/user/flanker/#mywall

    • 2 replies
    • 690 views
  19. pcmark vantage global top 20 score can't be submitted. it says valid link is not available. doesn't work with or without http etc. this is a pcmark vantage with 4 cores. I have a 6 core sub also. can't submit them,. the problem is there for few months now. https://www.3dmark.com/pcmv/616753

  20. Started by xsior,

    Hi can one of the mods please put me back to the rookie leagues. I chose water chilled cooling now i'm in the overclockers league, all i did was run a tube from my window to my aio, Canadian style. https://hwbot.org/submission/4063877_

  21. https://hwbot.org/benchmark/cinebench_-_r15/rankings?hardwareTypeId=processor_5695&cores=8#start=0#interval=20 I accidentally submitted with Stock selected instead of Custom for cooling. Can anyone advise on how I can fix this error. Thanks

  22. Went looking through my hardware library in my profile today, and noticed something... It seems my reference clock submissions for the P5E have been removed, but I never received any emails about such, or what could be wrong with them. Pictures clearly showcased that it was a P5E, text blurb specifically mentioned that it was a Rampage Formula bios being used (they're cross-compatible, and the Rampage Formula bios actually has a decent amount of options that the P5E's does not, AND it's noticeably more stable). And before someone says "screenshot looks like it says Maximus Formula on the PCB"... That's because the P5E was primarily Maximus Formula boards that didn…

  23. Started by VirpZ,

    Hope I am not posting this in the wrong area. I got two submissions for the HWBOT x265 Benchmark removed, one for the 4k and another for the 1080p. I have received no message about those submissions, they just disappeared from the ranks. I would like to know the reason these got removed. Thanks

  24. Guest Ximi
    Started by Guest Ximi,

    That's is the question .... I see some thing on hardware Sharing , some Teams practique that. Moderate Several times .... If I see it on submission's can I reported that ? Thank's !!

  25. This is a fairly low priority but I've noticed that some results for android benches like pcmark are done on x86 pcs running an android emulator like remix OS. Is this allowed or not?