Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

-> Validated score still wrong? Let us know here


Recommended Posts

I have reported few suspicious scores uploaded by the same user .

3Dmark01 single 8400 GS 256mb TOP 10

capturesx.th.jpg

 

delly 31794 marks 690/550/1380 @ e8600/5.5Ghz nature 206fps/draghotic low 468fps/lobby low 545fps

vs

Johny Bravo 30325 901/602/2238 @ e8600/5.4Ghz nature 151fps/draghotic low 383fps/lobby low 381fps

SAV 29144 900/560/2214 @ i7 920/4.6Ghz nature 146fps/draghotic low 367fps/lobby low 374fps

 

My question : how is that possible that he scored 1.5-4k marks more than others using much less gpu/mem/shaders speed ?

 

3dmark03 same category

delly 10716 690/550/1380 wings of fury 342fps

vs

01001 10690 830/570/2100 wings of fury 290fps

12 10580 777/611/1554 wings of fury 299fps

SAV 10539 900/555/2214 wings of fury 278fps

 

I already know NeoForce opinion :) but I disagree and I would like to ask other moderators .

I think these results should be take under consideration

I might be wrong too :)

 

2003 category

http://hwbot.org/searchResults.do?direction=&applicationId=2&numberOfVideocards=1&gpu=GeForce+8400+GS+%28G86%29+256+Mb+%28629%29&numberOfProcessors=0&cpu=&chipset=&manufacturer=&model=&minCpuFreq=&maxCpuFreq=&minGpuCoreFreq=&maxGpuCoreFreq=&minGpuMemFreq=&maxGpuMemFreq=&countryId=0&teamId=0&userName=&minScore=&maxScore=&gpuId=1187&cpuId=0&chipsetId=0&modelId=0&manufacturerId=0&offset=0&displayAdvanced=false&filterBlocked=true&dateFrom=&dateUntil=&system=&minTotalPoints=

2001 category

http://hwbot.org/searchResults.do?direction=&applicationId=1&numberOfVideocards=1&gpu=GeForce+8400+GS+%28G86%29+256+Mb+%28629%29&numberOfProcessors=0&cpu=&chipset=&manufacturer=&model=&minCpuFreq=&maxCpuFreq=&minGpuCoreFreq=&maxGpuCoreFreq=&minGpuMemFreq=&maxGpuMemFreq=&countryId=0&teamId=0&userName=&minScore=&maxScore=&gpuId=1187&cpuId=0&chipsetId=0&modelId=0&manufacturerId=0&offset=0&displayAdvanced=false&filterBlocked=true&dateFrom=&dateUntil=&system=&minTotalPoints=

 

so, who can comment these high/unreal scores ?

 

Jmke ? Massman ? Knopflerbruce ? guys please

Edited by 71proste
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another try :)

01: http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=735565

03: http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=735567

05: http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=735568

AM3: http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=735570

 

These scores were already reported/moderated, but moved into the wrong categoy back then. Please move the scores into this correct category: http://hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/radeon_x1550_256mb_rv_515_64_bit (My 06 score is already there)

Edited by Hyperhorn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I'm ranked second on this but I can't see the first place for the life of me:

 

X3380:

SuperPi 32m Hall Of Fame: (view top 100)

935839

SuperPi 32m - 10min 5sec 210ms - Jor3llBR/Elano (XtremeSystems) - (Intel Xeon X3380 @5130MHz)

0.1 points start discussion

858101

SuperPi 32m - 11min 54sec 0ms - road-runner (PURE) - (Intel Xeon X3380 @4199MHz)

0.1 points

 

Is it a bug?

 

I cleaned cookies etc but all I see is 2 results but my profile says I'm second place:

 

[#2 Xeon X3380 in SuperPi 32m] #2 Xeon X3380 in SuperPi 32m with 10min 5sec 210ms - 0.1 points

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hello!

 

My friend was requested me to post this comment :)

 

 

"Dear Moderator,

I would like to call Your atention that my result in the wPrime 32 Q9550 list is 8.140 while jor3elbr/elano's time is only 8.144.

When I wrote 8.140 I became the second although my time is better.

Please do the corrections in that way:

1., lipi67 8.140

2., jor3elbr/elano 8.144

Thank You very much in advance.

Yours faithfully

Lipi67"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi last night i submitted a score for vantage with a 5870 its my fastest score with a single gpu so far and it states i got 15 points + 1.5 now my points on profile has not changed at all it has been 24 hours but i still see no change to my points on my profile, but it states the points have been awarded when i look at the submitted result. i had 421 now still the same ????

http://hwbot.org/community/submission/951559_uncle_fester_3dmark_vantage___performance_radeon_hd_5870_21655_marks

________

Ignazio giunti

Edited by uncle fester
Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://hwbot.org/community/submission/952874_1badmojoe_reference_clock_rampage_ii_gene_220.44_mhz

 

Reference Clock Rampage II Gene rank: 1BadMoJoe’s best Reference Clock submission, but rank not calculated yet

 

I posted this some time ago and the rank has not been calculated in top5 Hall of Fame motherboard class, Thank you 1BadMoJoe

 

 

I just posted a submital a bit better than the one above, the one above I deleated and replaced with this one and still the same problem, Thank you again

 

http://hwbot.org/community/submission/956017_1badmojoe_reference_clock_rampage_ii_gene_223.5_mhz

Edited by 1BadMoJoe
detailed problem report
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another try :)

01: http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=735565

03: http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=735567

05: http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=735568

AM3: http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=735570

 

These scores were already reported/moderated, but moved into the wrong categoy back then. Please move the scores into this correct category: http://hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/radeon_x1550_256mb_rv_515_64_bit (My 06 score is already there)

I know you can do it. :D

 

Edit: Thank you so much!

Edited by Hyperhorn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...