-> Validated score still wrong? Let us know here

[71proste]

I have reported few suspicious scores uploaded by the same user .

3Dmark01 single 8400 GS 256mb TOP 10

 

delly 31794 marks 690/550/1380 @ e8600/5.5Ghz nature 206fps/draghotic low 468fps/lobby low 545fps

vs

Johny Bravo 30325 901/602/2238 @ e8600/5.4Ghz nature 151fps/draghotic low 383fps/lobby low 381fps

SAV 29144 900/560/2214 @ i7 920/4.6Ghz nature 146fps/draghotic low 367fps/lobby low 374fps

 

My question : how is that possible that he scored 1.5-4k marks more than others using much less gpu/mem/shaders speed ?

 

3dmark03 same category

delly 10716 690/550/1380 wings of fury 342fps

vs

01001 10690 830/570/2100 wings of fury 290fps

12 10580 777/611/1554 wings of fury 299fps

SAV 10539 900/555/2214 wings of fury 278fps

 

I already know NeoForce opinion but I disagree and I would like to ask other moderators .

I think these results should be take under consideration

I might be wrong too

 

2003 category

http://hwbot.org/searchResults.do?direction=&applicationId=2&numberOfVideocards=1&gpu=GeForce+8400+GS+%28G86%29+256+Mb+%28629%29&numberOfProcessors=0&cpu=&chipset=&manufacturer=&model=&minCpuFreq=&maxCpuFreq=&minGpuCoreFreq=&maxGpuCoreFreq=&minGpuMemFreq=&maxGpuMemFreq=&countryId=0&teamId=0&userName=&minScore=&maxScore=&gpuId=1187&cpuId=0&chipsetId=0&modelId=0&manufacturerId=0&offset=0&displayAdvanced=false&filterBlocked=true&dateFrom=&dateUntil=&system=&minTotalPoints=

2001 category

http://hwbot.org/searchResults.do?direction=&applicationId=1&numberOfVideocards=1&gpu=GeForce+8400+GS+%28G86%29+256+Mb+%28629%29&numberOfProcessors=0&cpu=&chipset=&manufacturer=&model=&minCpuFreq=&maxCpuFreq=&minGpuCoreFreq=&maxGpuCoreFreq=&minGpuMemFreq=&maxGpuMemFreq=&countryId=0&teamId=0&userName=&minScore=&maxScore=&gpuId=1187&cpuId=0&chipsetId=0&modelId=0&manufacturerId=0&offset=0&displayAdvanced=false&filterBlocked=true&dateFrom=&dateUntil=&system=&minTotalPoints=

 

so, who can comment these high/unreal scores ?

 

Jmke ? Massman ? Knopflerbruce ? guys please

Edited December 13, 2009 by 71proste

[71proste]

Thanks for removing 2001

Edited December 15, 2009 by 71proste

[Steven86]

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=932189

 

het gets golden cup in silge category whiulke hes on crossfire.

[Massman]

fixed

[Johnksss]

so ES chips are good in the single vantage card rankings?

[Hyperhorn]

Another try

01: http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=735565

03: http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=735567

05: http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=735568

AM3: http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=735570

 

These scores were already reported/moderated, but moved into the wrong categoy back then. Please move the scores into this correct category: http://hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/radeon_x1550_256mb_rv_515_64_bit (My 06 score is already there)

Edited December 21, 2009 by Hyperhorn

[TASOS]

Someone from hwbot team .... must take a look at the whole 9800GT DDR2 category.

 

bump !!

[TASOS]

Wrong category

 

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=869630

 

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=864578

 

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=872623

[Jor3llBR/Elano]

I'm ranked second on this but I can't see the first place for the life of me:

 

X3380:

SuperPi 32m Hall Of Fame: (view top 100)

935839

SuperPi 32m - 10min 5sec 210ms - Jor3llBR/Elano (XtremeSystems) - (Intel Xeon X3380 @5130MHz)

0.1 points start discussion

858101

SuperPi 32m - 11min 54sec 0ms - road-runner (PURE) - (Intel Xeon X3380 @4199MHz)

0.1 points

 

Is it a bug?

 

I cleaned cookies etc but all I see is 2 results but my profile says I'm second place:

 

[#2 Xeon X3380 in SuperPi 32m] #2 Xeon X3380 in SuperPi 32m with 10min 5sec 210ms - 0.1 points

[TITUL]

http://hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/geforce_9500m_gs

this category has 5 or 6 "non profed" results. i've reported, but it wasn`t moderated yet (practically 1 day)

[71proste]

Be patient mate

I have reported many scores more than week ago and still waiting

I believe that moderators are very busy they will check your results sOOn

[Thor941]

please explain

[71proste]

Sorry for confusing you, i have look closer and I was wrong

the post has been deleted

[Thor941]

ok no problem

[tiborrr]

Here's a brand new submission, it's worth quite a lot of points (~ 25) that is why I am reporting it here:

 

http://www.hwbot.org/community/submission/951055_rayhow_wprime_1024m_core_i3_540_4min_33sec_984ms?tab=info

 

Wrong Wprime version used (v2.0 instead of v1.55).

[darál0w]

hello!

 

My friend was requested me to post this comment

 

 

"Dear Moderator,

I would like to call Your atention that my result in the wPrime 32 Q9550 list is 8.140 while jor3elbr/elano's time is only 8.144.

When I wrote 8.140 I became the second although my time is better.

Please do the corrections in that way:

1., lipi67 8.140

2., jor3elbr/elano 8.144

Thank You very much in advance.

Yours faithfully

Lipi67"

[uncle fester]

Hi last night i submitted a score for vantage with a 5870 its my fastest score with a single gpu so far and it states i got 15 points + 1.5 now my points on profile has not changed at all it has been 24 hours but i still see no change to my points on my profile, but it states the points have been awarded when i look at the submitted result. i had 421 now still the same ????

http://hwbot.org/community/submission/951559_uncle_fester_3dmark_vantage___performance_radeon_hd_5870_21655_marks

________

Ignazio giunti

Edited February 28, 2011 by uncle fester

[Achill3uS]

I need a mod to check my score:

http://hwbot.org/community/submission/952164_achill3us_superpi_core_i5_661_6sec_515ms

my screenshot is corrupted and my result is now blocked. Whatever i do, upload or just link the screenshot the system just dont show it only if you click on the blocked img. pls fix it asap.

Thanks

Bala

[1BadMoJoe]

http://hwbot.org/community/submission/952874_1badmojoe_reference_clock_rampage_ii_gene_220.44_mhz

 

Reference Clock Rampage II Gene rank: 1BadMoJoe’s best Reference Clock submission, but rank not calculated yet

 

I posted this some time ago and the rank has not been calculated in top5 Hall of Fame motherboard class, Thank you 1BadMoJoe

 

 

I just posted a submital a bit better than the one above, the one above I deleated and replaced with this one and still the same problem, Thank you again

 

http://hwbot.org/community/submission/956017_1badmojoe_reference_clock_rampage_ii_gene_223.5_mhz

Edited February 6, 2010 by 1BadMoJoe
detailed problem report

[Hyperhorn]

Another try

01: http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=735565

03: http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=735567

05: http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=735568

AM3: http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=735570

 

These scores were already reported/moderated, but moved into the wrong categoy back then. Please move the scores into this correct category: http://hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/radeon_x1550_256mb_rv_515_64_bit (My 06 score is already there)

I know you can do it.

 

Edit: Thank you so much!

Edited February 7, 2010 by Hyperhorn

[Massman]

moved

[SORD]

http://hwbot.org/community/submission/859856_zonker_wprime_32m_phenom_ii_x3_720_be_9sec_360ms

 

This is X4 cpu.Could you please move it to X4 category?

[knopflerbruce]

http://hwbot.org/community/submission/859856_zonker_wprime_32m_phenom_ii_x3_720_be_9sec_360ms

 

This is X4 cpu.Could you please move it to X4 category?

 

Done.

[Mutant_Tractor]

Hi Guys,

Im not sure if this is the right place but my benchmark here:

http://hwbot.org/community/submission/960870_mutant_tractor__oc_jesus_wprime_32m_core_i7_980x_3sec_250ms

Has had the point i earned from it removed?

Is there any reason why?

Cheers!

MT

[Thor941]

the processor is under NDA